Growth against entropy in bacterial metabolism: the phenotypic trade-off behind empirical growth rate distributions in E. coli

The solution space of genome-scale models of cellular metabolism provides a map between physically viable flux configurations and cellular metabolic phenotypes described, at the most basic level, by the corresponding growth rates. By sampling the solution space of E. coli's metabolic network, we show that empirical growth rate distributions recently obtained in experiments at single-cell resolution can be explained in terms of a trade-off between the higher fitness of fast-growing phenotypes and the higher entropy of slow-growing ones. Based on this, we propose a minimal model for the evolution of a large bacterial population that captures this trade-off. The scaling relationships observed in experiments encode, in such frameworks, for the same distance from the maximum achievable growth rate, the same degree of growth rate maximization, and/or the same rate of phenotypic change. Being grounded on genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions, these results allow for multiple implications and extensions in spite of the underlying conceptual simplicity.

[1]  S. Jun,et al.  Cell-size maintenance: universal strategy revealed. , 2015, Trends in microbiology.

[2]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Basic and applied uses of genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions of Escherichia coli , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  The biomass objective function. , 2010, Current opinion in microbiology.

[4]  V. Shahrezaei,et al.  Connecting growth with gene expression: of noise and numbers. , 2015, Current opinion in microbiology.

[5]  Rami Pugatch,et al.  Greedy scheduling of cellular self-replication leads to optimal doubling times with a log-Frechet distribution , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  J. Monod The Growth of Bacterial Cultures , 1949 .

[7]  P. Swain,et al.  Gene Regulation at the Single-Cell Level , 2005, Science.

[8]  D. J. Kiviet,et al.  Stochasticity of metabolism and growth at the single-cell level , 2014, Nature.

[9]  E. Marinari,et al.  Quantitative constraint-based computational model of tumor-to-stroma coupling via lactate shuttle , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Ryan A. Kellogg,et al.  Noise Facilitates Transcriptional Control under Dynamic Inputs , 2015, Cell.

[11]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Pathogen Cell-to-Cell Variability Drives Heterogeneity in Host Immune Responses , 2015, Cell.

[12]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Living with noisy genes: how cells function reliably with inherent variability in gene expression. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[13]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  David W. Erickson,et al.  Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals a simple strategy of global resource allocation in bacteria , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  Hana El-Samad,et al.  Cellular noise regulons underlie fluctuations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[16]  Ivan Razinkov,et al.  High-throughput gene expression analysis at the level of single proteins using a microfluidic turbidostat and automated cell tracking , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  John T. Sauls,et al.  Cell-Size Control and Homeostasis in Bacteria , 2015, Current Biology.

[18]  Gasper Tkacik,et al.  Positional information, in bits , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  G. Crooks,et al.  Universality in stochastic exponential growth. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[20]  B. Palsson,et al.  An expanded genome-scale model of Escherichia coli K-12 (iJR904 GSM/GPR) , 2003, Genome Biology.

[21]  B. Palsson Systems Biology: Constraint-based Reconstruction and Analysis , 2015 .

[22]  Zachary A. King,et al.  Constraint-based models predict metabolic and associated cellular functions , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[23]  Jeffrey D Orth,et al.  What is flux balance analysis? , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  W. Bialek Biophysics: Searching for Principles , 2012 .

[25]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences , 2008, Cell.

[26]  Rajan P Kulkarni,et al.  Tunability and Noise Dependence in Differentiation Dynamics , 2007, Science.

[27]  Andrew Wright,et al.  Robust Growth of Escherichia coli , 2010, Current Biology.

[28]  Philippe Nghe,et al.  Individuality and universality in the growth-division laws of single E. coli cells. , 2014, Physical review. E.

[29]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Bacterial growth laws and their applications. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[30]  Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al.  Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance , 2009, Nature.

[31]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism—2011 , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[32]  O. Maaløe,et al.  Dependency on medium and temperature of cell size and chemical composition during balanced grown of Salmonella typhimurium. , 1958, Journal of general microbiology.

[33]  B. Palsson,et al.  Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[34]  W. Bialek,et al.  Probing the Limits to Positional Information , 2007, Cell.

[35]  G. Crooks,et al.  Scaling laws governing stochastic growth and division of single bacterial cells , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[37]  Matteo Mori,et al.  Uniform Sampling of Steady States in Metabolic Networks: Heterogeneous Scales and Rounding , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.