Communicating sensitive business issues: Part 2

This is the second of a two‐part article reporting the results of a study which investigated communication and relationships in the workplaces of four large organizations in Northern Ireland, two in the public sector and two in the private. A central purpose of the research was to evaluate suitable methods for auditing relationships among staff. Based on a review of the apposite literature on organizational and relational communication, the most promising techniques finally selected were the focus group approach, retrospective interview technique, social network analysis, and critical incident technique. In Part 1 the first two of these techniques were evaluated. Now, in Part 2 social network analysis and critical incident technique are similarly examined, in terms of their potential to generate quality data on the types of association that typify those who share a work environment. In a final conclusion to the two‐part article, recommendations for using qualitative and quantitative methods for auditing internal relationships are also offered.

[1]  Laura M. Koehly,et al.  Social Network Analysis: A New Methodology for Counseling Research. , 1998 .

[2]  N. Abell,et al.  Social network map: some further refinements on administration. , 1994, Social work research.

[3]  Dennis Tourish,et al.  Handbook of communication audits for organisations , 2000 .

[4]  O. Hargie,et al.  The priest as counsellor: An investigation of critical incidents in the pastoral work of catholic priests , 1997 .

[5]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communicating and organizing , 1976 .

[6]  Communicating sensitive business issues: Part 1 , 2003 .

[7]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[8]  D. Bejou,et al.  A Critical Incident Approach to Examining the Effects of Service Failures on Customer Relationships , 1996 .

[9]  D. Tolson,et al.  An investigation of the components of best nursing practice in the care of acutely ill hospitalized older patients with coincidental dementia: a multi-method design. , 1999, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[11]  Reed E. Nelson,et al.  Social Network Analysis as Intervention Tool , 1988 .

[12]  Daniel Lerner,et al.  Quantity and Quality , 1999, Science.

[13]  Peter Bogason.  Changes in the Scandinavian Model. From Bureaucratic Command to Interorganizational Negotiation , 1998 .

[14]  K. Provan,et al.  Measuring Network Structure , 1998 .

[15]  I. Norman,et al.  Quality of nursing care perceived by patients and their nurses: an application of the critical incident technique. Part 1 , 1999 .

[16]  Richard W. Stackman,et al.  Context and Sex Effects on Personal Work Networks , 1999 .

[17]  A. Bryman.  Quantity and quality in social research , 1988 .

[18]  D. Tolson,et al.  Practice innovation: a methodological maze. , 1999, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  R. Warnecke,et al.  Method Effects in Survey and Focus Group Findings: Understanding Smoking Cessation in Low-SES African American Women , 1997, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[20]  T. Toonen.  Networks, Management and Institutions: Public Administration as ‘Normal Science’ , 1998 .

[21]  Peter Lunt,et al.  Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research , 1996 .

[22]  Patricia M. Sias,et al.  Peer communication relationships and psychological climate , 1997 .

[23]  R. Nelson,et al.  Cause Maps and Social Network Analysis in Organizational Diagnosis , 1991 .

[24]  I. Norman,et al.  Developing Flanagan's critical incident technique to elicit indicators of high and low quality nursing care from patients and their nurses. , 1992, Journal of advanced nursing.

[25]  Peter Bogason,et al.  Introduction: Networks in Public Administration , 1998 .

[26]  S. Kvale.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[27]  M. C. Spears,et al.  Development of an instrument to evaluate critical incident performance. , 1979, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.