Multi-Connectivity for Indoor Terahertz Communication with Self and Dynamic Blockage

We derive new expressions for the connection probability and the average ergodic capacity to evaluate the performance achieved by multi-connectivity (MC) in an indoor ultra-wideband terahertz (THz) communication system. In this system, the user is affected by both self-blockage and dynamic human blockers. We first build up a three-dimensional propagation channel in this system to characterize the impact of molecular absorption loss and the shrinking usable bandwidth nature of the ultra-wideband THz channel. We then carry out new performance analysis for two MC strategies: 1) Closest line-of-sight (LOS) access point (AP) MC (C-MC), and 2) Reactive MC (R-MC). With numerical results, we validate our analysis and show the considerable improvement achieved by both MC strategies in the connection probability. We further show that the C-MC and R-MC strategies provide significant and marginal capacity gain relative to the single connectivity strategy, respectively, and increasing the number of the user’s associated APs imposes completely different affects on the capacity gain achieved by the C-MC and R-MC strategies. Additionally, we clarify that our analysis allows us to determine the optimal density of APs in order to maximize the capacity gain.

[1]  Zhi Chen,et al.  A survey on terahertz communications , 2019, China Communications.

[2]  Sergey Andreev,et al.  On the Degree of Multi-Connectivity in 5G Millimeter-Wave Cellular Urban Deployments , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Yevgeni Koucheryavy,et al.  Last Meter Indoor Terahertz Wireless Access: Performance Insights and Implementation Roadmap , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Sergey Andreev,et al.  Dynamic Multi-Connectivity Performance in Ultra-Dense Urban mmWave Deployments , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Shivendra S. Panwar,et al.  The Impact of Mobile Blockers on Millimeter Wave Cellular Systems , 2018, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Chong Han,et al.  Interference and Coverage Analysis for Terahertz Band Communication in Nanonetworks , 2017, GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[7]  John G. Kemeny,et al.  Finite Markov Chains. , 1960 .

[8]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Channel Modeling and Capacity Analysis for Electromagnetic Wireless Nanonetworks in the Terahertz Band , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Combating the Distance Problem in the Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Frequency Bands , 2018, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Sergey Andreev,et al.  Capacity of Multiconnectivity mmWave Systems With Dynamic Blockage and Directional Antennas , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[11]  Josep Miquel Jornet,et al.  Hierarchical Bandwidth Modulation for Ultra-Broadband Terahertz Communications , 2019, ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[12]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Properties of random direction models , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[13]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Multi-Ray Channel Modeling and Wideband Characterization for Wireless Communications in the Terahertz Band , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Sergey Andreev,et al.  On the Temporal Effects of Mobile Blockers in Urban Millimeter-Wave Cellular Scenarios , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.