Assessing Expertise Awareness in Resolution Networks

Problem resolution is a key issue in the IT service industry. A large service provider handles, on daily basis, thousands of tickets that report various types of problems from its customers. The efficiency of this process highly depends on the effective interactions among various expert groups, in search of the resolver to the reported problem. In fact, ticket transfer decisions reflect the expertise awareness between groups, thus encoding a sophisticated resolution social network. In this paper, we propose a computational framework to quantitatively assess expertise awareness, i.e., how well a group knows the expertise of others. An accurate assessment of expertise awareness could identify the weakest components in a resolution system. The framework, built on our previously developed resolution engine, is able to calculate the performance difference caused by excluding a node from the network. The difference exposes the awareness of this node to other nodes in the network. To our best knowledge, this is the first study on this problem from a computational perspective. We tested the proposed framework on a large set of real-world problem tickets and validated our discovery by carefully analyzing the tickets that are incorrectly transferred. Experimental results show that our framework can successfully capture groups that do not know others' expertise very well.

[1]  P. Tan,et al.  Node roles and community structure in networks , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[2]  Konrad Tollmar,et al.  Supporting social awareness @ work design and experience , 1996, CSCW '96.

[3]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[4]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[5]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[6]  Yi Chen,et al.  Efficient ticket routing by resolution sequence mining , 2008, KDD.

[7]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing , 2002, KDD.

[8]  Yichuan Cai,et al.  MASS: a multi-facet domain-specific influential blogger mining system , 2010, 2010 IEEE 26th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2010).

[9]  Yngve Sundblad,et al.  An Analysis of Design and Collaboration in a Distributed Environment , 1991, ECSCW.

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[12]  Misook Heo.  Relationship-based Social Awareness Disclosure , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).

[13]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  On distinguishing between Internet power law topology generators , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[14]  H. White,et al.  “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  Allan Borodin,et al.  Link analysis ranking: algorithms, theory, and experiments , 2005, TOIT.

[16]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[17]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Topic and Role Discovery in Social Networks , 2005, IJCAI.