Disentangling the Effect of Top Management Support and Training on Systems Implementation Success: A Meta-Analysis

Systems implementation is an important topic, and numerous studies have been conducted to identify determinants of success. Among organizational factors that can have an impact on success, top management support and training are two of the most extensively studied variables. While the positive influence of both of these organizational factors is generally recognized, not all empirical evidence is supportive. Some researchers attribute the inconsistent findings to moderators such as task interdependence. Other researchers contend that the wide-ranging correlations observed in different studies are caused by nothing but statistical artifacts. Still another reason for the inconsistent results could be how the two variables are modeled. I meta-analyzed thirty prior studies that examine the effect of both top management support and training. The results support both independent variables having a moderate positive effect on implementation success. Additionally, they suggest that the most plausible model is one where training partially mediates the effect of top management support. Finally, the preponderance of evidence indicates that task interdependence does not moderate the effect of either top management support or training. Instead, the role of task interdependence is similar to that of top management support and training: as an independent variable with a direct effect on implementation success.

[1]  Mark I. Hwang,et al.  The effect of user engagement on system success: A meta-analytical integration of research findings , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Metastructuration actions of management: critical for stakeholder intervention in IS/IT implementations , 2012 .

[3]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Estimating the effect of common method variance: the method-method pair technique with an illustration from TAM research , 2009 .

[4]  Amany R. Elbanna Top management support in multiple-project environments: an in-practice view , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Charles J. Capps,et al.  Information systems development project performance in the 21st century , 2010, SOEN.

[6]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[7]  Nancy L. Russo The impact of context on innovation in information systems , 1993 .

[8]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[9]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2007, MIS Q..

[11]  Geoffry S. Howard,et al.  Discretionary Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model* , 1991 .

[12]  F. Nelson Ford,et al.  Information Security Effectiveness: Conceptualization and Validation of a Theory , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Secur. Priv..

[13]  James F. Courtney,et al.  A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success , 1985, MIS Q..

[14]  Barton Lee Dahmer,et al.  Factors associated with implementation and usage of technology-based training: developing and testing a technology implementation model , 1994 .

[15]  Emad M. Kamhawi Critical Factors for Implementation Success of ERP Systems: An Empirical Investigation from Bahrain , 2007, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Ernest Jordan,et al.  Top management support: mantra or necessity? , 2008 .

[17]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test , 1993 .

[18]  Kathy Brittain White,et al.  Information Systems Development Success: Perspectives from Project Team Participants , 1986, MIS Q..

[19]  Alexander M. Maish A User's Behavior Toward His MIS , 1979, MIS Q..

[20]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Top Management Support, External Expertise and Information Systems Implementation in Small Businesses , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Successful IS innovation: the contingent contributions of innovation characteristics and implementation process , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model , 1990 .

[23]  Jaehoon Whang An empirical study of factors influencing interorganizational information systems implementation: A case of the real estate industry , 1992 .

[24]  William A. Kleintop The acceptance of new information technologies by end users , 1993 .

[25]  A. A. Adekoya Evaluation of factors promoting successful microcomputing implementation in the Nigerian workplace , 1993 .

[26]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Role of Environment-Based Voluntariness in Information Technology Acceptance , 2009, MIS Q..

[27]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[28]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  Key antecedents of Executive Information System success: a path analytic approach , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  G. Latham,et al.  Developing and Training Human Resources in Organizations , 1991 .

[30]  Chris Higgins,et al.  Top management support of enterprise systems implementations , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[31]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2003, MIS Q..

[32]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Top management support and IS implementation: further support for the moderating role of task interdependence , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Starling David Hunter,et al.  Same technology, different outcome? Reinterpreting Barley's Technology as an Occasion for Structuring , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[36]  Mark I. Hwang,et al.  Assessing moderating effect in meta-analysis: a re-analysis of top management support studies and suggestions for researchers , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[38]  Princely Ifinedo,et al.  Impacts of business vision, top management support, and external expertise on ERP success , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[39]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  The Determinants of DSS Success: An Integrated Model* , 1992 .

[40]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  The Role of Social Support in the Process of Work Stress: A Meta-Analysis , 1999 .

[41]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[42]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Critical success factors revisited: success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[44]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[45]  Glenn Snelbecker,et al.  Factors related to the use of an electronic performance support system (epss) , 2000 .

[46]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[47]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An examination of end-user types , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  An empirical investigation of ODSS impact on individuals and organizations , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[49]  Arun Rai,et al.  Stimulating the use of computer-aided software engineering in information system departments: an empirical test of elements of innovation theory , 1990 .

[50]  John Ricks Olson Information exchange in a supply chain : an empirical investigation , 1999 .

[51]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Comparison of end-user computing characteristics in the U.S., Israel and Taiwan , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[52]  Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al.  Accounting for Heterogeneity via Random-Effects Models and Moderator Analyses in Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[53]  Daniel Paul Manson Determinants and consequences of user groupware customization , 1998 .

[54]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..