Creativity and mathematical problem posing: an analysis of high school students' mathematical problem posing in China and the USA

In the literature, problem-posing abilities are reported to be an important aspect/indicator of creativity in mathematics. The importance of problem-posing activities in mathematics is emphasized in educational documents in many countries, including the USA and China. This study was aimed at exploring high school students' creativity in mathematics by analyzing their problem-posing abilities in geometric scenarios. The participants in this study were from one location in the USA and two locations in China. All participants were enrolled in advanced mathematical courses in the local high school. Differences in the problems posed by the three groups are discussed in terms of quality (novelty/elaboration) as well as quantity (fluency). The analysis of the data indicated that even mathematically advanced high school students had trouble posing good quality and/or novel mathematical problems. We discuss our findings in terms of the culture and curricula of the respective school systems and suggest implications for future directions in problem-posing research within mathematics education.

[1]  Stephen I. Brown,et al.  The Art of Problem Posing , 1983 .

[2]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing , 2002 .

[3]  Henri Poincaré.  Science and Method , 1914 .

[4]  R. Sternberg.  The Nature of creativity : contemporary psychological perspectives , 1988 .

[5]  Lyn D. English.  Complex systems in the elementary and middle school mathematics curriculum: A focus on modeling , 2007 .

[6]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[7]  Roza Leikin,et al.  Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students , 2009 .

[8]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1985, Science.

[9]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity , 1994 .

[10]  Atara Shriki.  Working like real mathematicians: developing prospective teachers’ awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concepts , 2010 .

[11]  James W. Stigler,et al.  The Learning Gap: Why our Schools are Failing and What We can Learn from Japanese and Chinese Education. , 1993 .

[12]  T. Husén.  INTERNATIONAL STUDY OF ACHIEVEMENT IN MATHEMATICS, A COMPARISON OF TWELVE COUNTRIES, VOLUME I. , 1967 .

[13]  Ngai-Ying Wong,et al.  From “Entering the Way” to “Exiting the Way”: In Search of a Bridge to Span “Basic Skills” and “Process Abilities” , 2006 .

[14]  Anil K. Shukla.  Mathematics of aesthetics , 1987 .

[15]  Liping Ma,et al.  Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States , 2010 .

[16]  S. Arieti,et al.  Creativity: The Magic Synthesis , 1979 .

[17]  N. Andreasen,et al.  Bipolar affective disorder and creativity: implications and clinical management. , 1988, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[18]  D. Robitaille,et al.  Contexts and outcomes of school mathematics , 1989 .

[19]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  Beyond Computation and Correctness: Contributions of Open‐Ended Tasks in Examining U. S. and Chinese Students’Mathematical Performance , 2005 .

[20]  Vadim Andreevich Krutet︠s︡kiĭ.  The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren , 1976 .

[21]  Shiqi Li,et al.  The "Two Basics": Mathematics Teaching and Learning in Mainland China , 2004 .

[22]  H. Stevenson.  Why Asian Students Still Outdistance Americans. , 1993 .

[23]  E. Silver.  Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing , 1997 .

[24]  Edward J. Barbeau,et al.  Challenging mathematics in and beyond the classroom : the 16th ICMI study , 2009 .

[25]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[26]  Stephen T. Peverly.  Moving past cultural homogeneity: Suggestions for comparisons of students' educational outcomes in the United States and China , 2005 .

[27]  J. Culpepper.  National Center for Educational Statistics , 2007 .

[28]  H. Pashler,et al.  Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[29]  J. R. Newman.  The World of Mathematics , 1961 .

[30]  Bharath Sriraman.  Creativity, giftedness, and talent development in mathematics , 2008 .

[31]  Norma C. Presmeg,et al.  Visualisation and mathematical giftedness , 1986 .

[32]  Douglas B. McLeod,et al.  Affect and mathematical problem solving : a new perspective , 1989 .

[33]  Bharath Sriraman,et al.  What are the Elements of Giftedness and Creativity in Mathematics , 2011 .

[34]  B. Ghiselin,et al.  The Creative Process , 2010 .

[35]  Lianghuo Fan,et al.  How Chinese learn mathematics : perspectives from insiders , 2004 .

[36]  J. S. Allender.  A Study of Inquiry Activity in Elementary School Children1 , 1969 .

[37]  Jinfa Cai.  An investigation of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem posing and problem solving , 1998 .

[38]  R. Richards,et al.  Creativity in manic-depressives, cyclothymes, their normal relatives, and control subjects. , 1988, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[39]  F. Leung,et al.  Cracking the Paradox of the Chinese Learners - Looking into the mathematics classrooms in Hong Kong and Shanghai , 2003 .

[40]  Bharath Sriraman,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Relationships between Students’ Creativity and Mathematical Problem-Posing Abilities , 2011 .

[41]  Edwin Hewitt,et al.  Rings of real-valued continuous functions. I , 1948 .

[42]  G. Wallas.  The art of thought , 1926 .

[43]  Joe Garofalo,et al.  Self-Confidence, Interest, Beliefs, and Metacognition: Key Influences on Problem-Solving Behavior , 1989 .

[44]  Richard Lesh,et al.  From Problem Solving to Modeling: The Evolution of Thinking About Research on Complex Mathematical Activity , 2003 .

[45]  Bharath Sriraman.  The characteristics of mathematical creativity , 2004 .

[46]  Martin H. Levinson.  Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1997 .

[47]  K. Thompson.  Cognitive and Analytical Psychology Howard Gardner .Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, Basic Books, 1983. , 1985 .

[48]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Combinatorial Mathematics: Research into Practice , 2004 .

[49]  G. Birkhoff.  Mathematics and Psychology , 1969 .

[50]  Mark A. Runco.  The Creativity Research Handbook , 2012 .

[51]  E. Torrance.  The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. , 1988 .

[52]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  The International Handbook of Creativity. , 2006 .

[53]  Joan Ferrini-Mundy,et al.  Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: A Guide for Mathematicians , 2000 .

[54]  Z. Usiskin.  The Development Into the Mathematically Talented , 2000 .

[55]  Jack Dempsey.  Student Styles Questionnaire , 2014 .

[56]  Nerida F. Ellerton,et al.  Children's made-up mathematics problems — a new perspective on talented mathematicians , 1986 .

[57]  D. Uttal,et al.  Low and High Mathematics Achievement in Japanese, Chinese, and American Elementary-School Children. , 1988 .

[58]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Problem solving for the 21st century , 2010 .

[59]  The National Assessment of Educational Progress , 1996 .

[60]  Mario Bunge,et al.  Scientific Research I , 1967 .

[61]  Ralph Mason,et al.  Challenging Mathematics: Classroom Practices , 2009 .

[62]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  ? + ? = creativity. , 2018, Public health nursing.

[63]  Jinfa Cai.  Mathematical Thinking Involved in U.S. and Chinese Students' Solving of Process-Constrained and Process-Open Problems , 2000 .

[64]  Bharath Sriraman,et al.  The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics , 2011 .

[65]  Bharath Sriraman,et al.  Aesthetics and Creativity : An exploration of the relationships between the constructs , 2008 .

[66]  Fiz Karlsruhe.  Roza Leikin, Abraham Berman, Boris Koichu (eds): Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students , 2010 .

[67]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[68]  J. Biggs,et al.  Approaches to Learning in Secondary and Tertiary Students in ong Kong: Some Comparative Studies , 1991 .

[69]  Jonathan A. Plucker,et al.  Creativity and interdisciplinarity: one creativity or many creativities? , 2009 .

[70]  J. Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1945 .

[71]  Lyn D. English,et al.  The Development of Fifth-Grade Children's Problem-Posing Abilities , 1997 .

[72]  Douglas P. Newton,et al.  Pre-service primary teachers’ conceptions of creativity in mathematics , 2010 .

[73]  Ngai-Ying Wong,et al.  The CHC Learner's Phenomenon: Its Implications on Mathematics Education , 2004 .

[74]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[75]  Bharath Sriraman.  Are Giftedness and Creativity Synonyms in Mathematics? , 2005 .

[76]  M. Barnes,et al.  'Magical' Moments in Mathematics: Insights into the Process of Coming To Know. , 2000 .

[77]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[78]  T. Oakland,et al.  Temperament Styles of Children from the People's Republic of China and the United States , 2006 .

[79]  Elena Stoyanova.  Extending and exploring students' problem solving via problem posing , 1997 .

[80]  Barbara J. Dougherty,et al.  Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 2020 .

[81]  Ut Na Sio,et al.  Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[82]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students' mathematical performance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving , 1995 .

[83]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers , 2012 .