Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding

Abstract The chaperonin ring assembly GroEL provides kinetic assistance to protein folding in the cell by binding non-native protein in the hydrophobic central cavity of an open ring and subsequently, upon binding ATP and the co-chaperonin GroES to the same ring, releasing polypeptide into a now hydrophilic encapsulated cavity where productive folding occurs in isolation. The fate of polypeptide during binding, encapsulation, and folding in the chamber has been the subject of recent experimental studies and is reviewed and considered here. We conclude that GroEL, in general, behaves passively with respect to its substrate proteins during these steps. While binding appears to be able to rescue non-native polypeptides from kinetic traps, such rescue is most likely exerted at the level of maximizing hydrophobic contact, effecting alteration of the topology of weakly structured states. Encapsulation does not appear to involve ‘forced unfolding’, and if anything, polypeptide topology is compacted during this step. Finally, chamber-mediated folding appears to resemble folding in solution, except that major kinetic complications of multimolecular association are prevented.

[1]  H. Saibil,et al.  Chaperonin complex with a newly folded protein encapsulated in the folding chamber , 2009, Nature.

[2]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  GroEL‐GroES‐mediated protein folding , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[3]  Steven M. Johnson,et al.  Requirement for binding multiple ATPs to convert a GroEL ring to the folding-active state , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Charu Chaudhry,et al.  Role of the γ‐phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL–GroES: function, structure and energetics , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[5]  RosemanAM ChenS FurtakK FentonWA SaibilHR HorwichAL RyeHS GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. , 1999 .

[6]  A. Myers,et al.  Characterization of the yeast HSP60 gene coding for a mitochondrial assembly factor , 1989, Nature.

[7]  J. Udgaonkar,et al.  A thermodynamic coupling mechanism can explain the GroEL-mediated acceleration of the folding of barstar. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  A. Clarke,et al.  Chaperonins can catalyse the reversal of early aggregation steps when a protein misfolds. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. II. GroEL recognizes thermally unfolded mature beta-lactamase. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  A. Horwich,et al.  Folding of malate dehydrogenase inside the GroEL–GroES cavity , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[11]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Purified chaperonin 60 (groEL) interacts with the nonnative states of a multitude of Escherichia coli proteins , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[12]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. , 1996, Structure.

[13]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[14]  G. Farr,et al.  Inaugural Article: Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL , 2004 .

[15]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex , 1996, Nature.

[16]  A. Fersht,et al.  Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[17]  J. Buchner,et al.  Interaction of GroE with an all-beta-protein. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. , 1994, Science.

[19]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[20]  K. Braig,et al.  A polypeptide bound by the chaperonin groEL is localized within a central cavity. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  E. Orlova,et al.  Topologies of a Substrate Protein Bound to the Chaperonin GroEL , 2007, Molecular cell.

[22]  H. Rye,et al.  Triggering Protein Folding within the GroEL-GroES Complex* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Chaperonins facilitate the in vitro folding of monomeric mitochondrial rhodanese. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  G. Farr,et al.  GroEL/GroES-Mediated Folding of a Protein Too Large to Be Encapsulated , 2001, Cell.

[25]  John R Yates,et al.  Global aggregation of newly translated proteins in an Escherichia coli strain deficient of the chaperonin GroEL , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Lewis E. Kay,et al.  Quantitative dynamics and binding studies of the 20S proteasome by NMR , 2007, Nature.

[27]  Masasuke Yoshida,et al.  Determination of the Number of Active GroES Subunits in the Fused Heptamer GroES Required for Interactions with GroEL* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Transient kinetic analysis of adenosine 5'-triphosphate binding-induced conformational changes in the allosteric chaperonin GroEL. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[29]  E. Eisenstein,et al.  The Hydrophobic Nature of GroEL-Substrate Binding (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  Elizabeth A. Craig,et al.  A subfamily of stress proteins facilitates translocation of secretory and mitochondrial precursor polypeptides , 1988, Nature.

[31]  B. Gowen,et al.  ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy , 2001, Cell.

[32]  S. Chen,et al.  ATP induces large quaternary rearrangements in a cage-like chaperonin structure , 1993, Current Biology.

[33]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Concerted release of substrate domains from GroEL by ATP is demonstrated with FRET. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  G. Lorimer,et al.  A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  F. Hartl,et al.  Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Chemie und Pharmazie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Structural Features of the GroEL-GroES Nano-Cage Required for Rapid Folding of Encapsulated Protein , 2007 .

[36]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[37]  G. Farr,et al.  Perturbed ATPase activity and not “close confinement” of substrate in the cis cavity affects rates of folding by tail-multiplied GroEL , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  M. Fisher,et al.  Interactions between the GroE Chaperonins and Rhodanese , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  A. Plückthun,et al.  beta-Lactamase binds to GroEL in a conformation highly protected against hydrogen/deuterium exchange. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Arthur L Horwich,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: fate of substrate polypeptide , 2003, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[41]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Folding trajectories of human dihydrofolate reductase inside the GroEL–GroES chaperonin cavity and free in solution , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  M Karplus,et al.  The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: a dynamic analysis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Reconstitution of active dimeric ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from an unfolded state depends on two chaperonin proteins and Mg-ATP , 1989, Nature.

[44]  C. Anfinsen Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.

[45]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Florence Tama,et al.  The 13 angstroms structure of a chaperonin GroEL-protein substrate complex by cryo-electron microscopy. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  H. Pelham Hsp70 accelerates the recovery of nucleolar morphology after heat shock. , 1984, The EMBO journal.

[48]  W. Tap,et al.  Specificity in chaperonin-mediated protein folding , 1995, Nature.

[49]  Yechezkel Kashi,et al.  GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms , 1994, Cell.

[50]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Chaperonin-facilitated refolding of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase and ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60 (groEL) are K+ dependent. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[51]  R. Jaenicke,et al.  GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[52]  P. Sigler,et al.  The Crystal Structure of a GroEL/Peptide Complex Plasticity as a Basis for Substrate Diversity , 1999, Cell.

[53]  H. Rye,et al.  Expansion and compression of a protein folding intermediate by GroEL. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[54]  J. Weissman,et al.  Mechanism of GroEL action: Productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under groes , 1995, Cell.

[55]  K. Furtak,et al.  Multivalent Binding of Nonnative Substrate Proteins by the Chaperonin GroEL , 2000, Cell.

[56]  Helen R. Saibil,et al.  GroEL-GroES Cycling ATP and Nonnative Polypeptide Direct Alternation of Folding-Active Rings , 1999, Cell.

[57]  H. Pelham Speculations on the functions of the major heat shock and glucose-regulated proteins , 1986, Cell.

[58]  A. Clarke,et al.  Elucidation of Steps in the Capture of a Protein Substrate for Efficient Encapsulation by GroE * , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  A. Clarke,et al.  Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  T. Creighton,et al.  Conformational specificity of the chaperonin GroEL for the compact folding intermediates of alpha‐lactalbumin. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[61]  A. Horwich,et al.  No evidence for a forced‐unfolding mechanism during ATP/GroES binding to substrate‐bound GroEL: no observable protection of metastable Rubisco intermediate or GroEL‐bound Rubisco from tritium exchange , 2005, FEBS letters.

[62]  A. Horwich,et al.  Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL , 1994, Nature.

[64]  L. Kremer,et al.  GroEL1: A Dedicated Chaperone Involved in Mycolic Acid Biosynthesis during Biofilm Formation in Mycobacteria , 2005, Cell.

[65]  D. J. Naylor,et al.  Dual Function of Protein Confinement in Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding , 2001, Cell.

[66]  A. Horwich,et al.  Chaperonin chamber accelerates protein folding through passive action of preventing aggregation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Equilibrium and kinetics of the allosteric transition of GroEL studied by solution X-ray scattering and fluorescence spectroscopy. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  A. Fersht,et al.  A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  Proton–proton Overhauser NMR spectroscopy with polypeptide chains in large structures , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Concerted ATP-induced allosteric transitions in GroEL facilitate release of protein substrate domains in an all-or-none manner , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  L. Gierasch,et al.  Basis of substrate binding by the chaperonin GroEL. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[72]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  Direct NMR observation of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  Yali Li,et al.  GroEL Recognizes an Amphipathic Helix and Binds to the Hydrophobic Side* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[74]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  The 13 Å Structure of a Chaperonin GroEL–Protein Substrate Complex by Cryo-electron Microscopy , 2005 .

[75]  P. Høj,et al.  Generation of a stable folding intermediate which can be rescued by the chaperonins GroEL and GroES , 1994, FEBS letters.

[76]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Chaperonin‐mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[77]  Y. Kawata,et al.  GroEL-Substrate-GroES Ternary Complexes Are an Important Transient Intermediate of the Chaperonin Cycle* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[78]  A. Horwich,et al.  Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL , 1997, Nature.

[79]  K. Kuwajima,et al.  The chaperonin GroEL does not recognize apo-α-lactalbumin in the molten globule state , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[80]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.

[81]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[82]  A. Miller,et al.  Secondary structure forming propensity coupled with amphiphilicity is an optimal motif in a peptide or protein for association with chaperonin 60 (GroEL). , 1999, Biochemistry.

[83]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Chaperonin releases the substrate protein in a form with tendency to aggregate and ability to rebind to chaperonin , 1995, FEBS letters.

[84]  H. Rye,et al.  GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[85]  F. Hartl,et al.  Significant hydrogen exchange protection in GroEL‐bound DHFR is maintained during iterative rounds of substrate cycling , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[86]  Y. Kawata,et al.  Functional communications between the apical and equatorial domains of GroEL through the intermediate domain. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[87]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Sequential ATP-induced allosteric transitions of the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP-1 revealed by EM analysis , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[88]  J. Weissman,et al.  Characterization of the Active Intermediate of a GroEL–GroES-Mediated Protein Folding Reaction , 1996, Cell.

[89]  S W Englander,et al.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. , 1999, Science.

[90]  S. McAteer,et al.  The tail of a chaperonin: the C‐terminal region of Esctierichia coli GroEL protein , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[91]  Identification of the binding surface on beta-lactamase for GroEL by limited proteolysis and MALDI-mass spectrometry. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[92]  M. Textor,et al.  Probing protein-chaperone interactions with single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[93]  Neil A. Ranson,et al.  Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL–GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy , 1994, Nature.

[94]  K. Furtak,et al.  Loops in the Central Channel of ClpA Chaperone Mediate Protein Binding, Unfolding, and Translocation , 2005, Cell.

[95]  Greg L. Hersch,et al.  Sculpting the Proteome with AAA+ Proteases and Disassembly Machines , 2004, Cell.

[96]  F. Neidhardt,et al.  Levels of major proteins of Escherichia coli during growth at different temperatures , 1979, Journal of bacteriology.

[97]  F. Hartl,et al.  Monitoring Protein Conformation along the Pathway of Chaperonin-Assisted Folding , 2008, Cell.

[98]  A. Horwich,et al.  A carboxy-terminal deletion impairs the assembly of GroEL and confers a pleiotropic phenotype in Escherichia coli K-12 , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[99]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein folding in mitochondria requires complex formation with hsp60 and ATP hydrolysis , 1989, Nature.

[100]  F. Shewmaker,et al.  The Disordered Mobile Loop of GroES Folds into a Defined β-Hairpin upon Binding GroEL* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[101]  C. Dobson,et al.  Conformation of GroEL-bound α-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry , 1994, Nature.

[102]  F. Hartl,et al.  Mitochondrial heat-shock protein hsp60 is essential for assembly of proteins imported into yeast mitochondria , 1989, Nature.

[103]  Y. Kawata,et al.  Stopped-flow Fluorescence Analysis of the Conformational Changes in the GroEL Apical Domain , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[104]  C. Dobson,et al.  Conformation of GroEL-bound alpha-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry. , 1994, Nature.