Focal Firms as Technological Gatakeepers within Industrial Districts Knowledge Creation and Dissemination in the Italian Packaging Machinery Industry

Despite the diffusion of communication tools and boundary spanning technologies, knowledge flows in innovation processes retain a distinct localized nature in many industries and geographical clusters emerge as critical areas to foster technological diffusion. In this paper we focus on the role of focal firms in industrial clusters as “gatekeepers” introducing external technological novelties in the cluster and enacting new useful knowledge production locally, thus enhancing international competitive capabilities of all firms in the cluster. We analyze a longitudinal dataset of 720 patents 1 Corresponding Author www.druid.dk granted by USPTO between 1990 and 2003 to firms in the automatic packaging machinery industrial district of Emilia-Romagna in Northern Italy, and a matched-sample to control for the uneven geographical distribution of R&D and patenting activities. Our results show that firms within the cluster use local knowledge to a greater extent and more rapidly than knowledge from the outside than it would be expected given the geographic distribution of innovative activity in the industry. Moreover, focal firms use external knowledge to a greater extent than other firms operating in the cluster, and other (non focal) firms within the cluster use knowledge from focal firms to a greater extent than would be expected given the geographic distribution of innovative activity in the industry. Implications for research on the geographical distribution of innovation activities are discussed.

[1]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW プラットフォーム・リーダーシップ:イノベーションのマネジメント , 2002 .

[2]  A. A. Kayal,et al.  An empirical evaluation of the technology cycle time indicator as a measure of the pace of technological progress in superconductor technology , 1999 .

[3]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[5]  Giacomo Becattini,et al.  Industrial Sectors and Industrial Districts: Tools for Industrial Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  What is behind the recent surge in patenting , 1999 .

[7]  R. Katz,et al.  An Investigation into the Managerial Roles and Career Paths of Gatekeepers and Project Supervisors in a Major R&D Facility : R&D Management , 2011 .

[8]  Cristina Boari,et al.  Networks within Industrial Districts: Organising Knowledge Creation and Transfer by Means of Moderate Hierarchies , 1999 .

[9]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[10]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[11]  A. Shaw,et al.  On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics , 2000 .

[12]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Reinventing Public R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies , 2001 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation , 1997 .

[14]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[15]  H. Schmitz,et al.  Small Shoemakers and Fordist Giants: Tale of a Supercluster , 1993 .

[16]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The firms that feed industrial districts: A return to the Italian source , 1999 .

[17]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[18]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  No 0301 Knowledge Flows through Informal Contacts in Industrial Clusters : Myths or Realities ? , 2003 .

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[20]  Suma Athreye,et al.  Agglomeration and Growth: A Study of the Cambridge Hi-Tech Cluster , 2001 .

[21]  Leo Sveikauskas,et al.  The Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. , 1986 .

[22]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[23]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[24]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters , 2004 .

[25]  Maurizio Sobrero,et al.  The glue and the pieces: Entrepreneurship and innovation in small-firm networks , 1994 .

[26]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[27]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[28]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[29]  A. Jaffe.  The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process , 2000 .

[30]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[31]  G. Becattini,et al.  Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy , 1990 .

[32]  Jeffrey H. Dyer.  Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[33]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? , 2004 .

[34]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[35]  Pietro Romano,et al.  Back to the Future: Benetton Transforms Its Global Network , 2001 .

[36]  John E. Richards.  Clusters, Competition, and “Global Players” in ICT Markets: The Case of Scandinavia , 2004 .

[37]  Ron Martin,et al.  Critical survey. The new 'geographical turn' in economics: some critical reflections , 1999 .

[38]  R. Burt.  The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[39]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters: Taiwan's Hsinchu Region , 2004 .

[40]  Sebastiano Brusco.  The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration , 1982 .

[41]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[42]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  Creating a Strategic Center to Manage a Web of Partners , 1995 .

[43]  Kevin Davis,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters: Learning the Silicon Valley Way , 2004 .

[44]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[45]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[46]  Juan Alcacer,et al.  How Do I Know What You Know? Patent Examiners and the Generation of Patent Citations , 2004 .

[47]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[48]  A. Saxenian.  The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley , 1991 .

[49]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Erik Stam,et al.  Clusters of High Technology SMEs: The Dutch Case , 1999 .

[51]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of Nasa and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation , 1997 .

[52]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Innovation and Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from European Data , 2003 .

[53]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[54]  M. Feldman.  The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[55]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: the case of Brescia mechanical cluster , 2001 .

[56]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[57]  Rui Baptista,et al.  Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters , 2000 .

[58]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[59]  André Torre,et al.  Economie industrielle et économie spatiale , 1995 .

[60]  Maryann P. Feldman.  The geography of innovation , 1994 .

[61]  Vincenza Odorici,et al.  Clusters and Rivalry: Does Localization Really Matter? , 2003 .

[62]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .