State Building in Korea: Continuity and Crisis
暂无分享,去创建一个
In the early twenty-first century, the hierarchy of advanced industrial nations remains quite similar to what it was at the end of the nineteenth century: the leading economy today, the United States, was the most productive industrial power then; the leading economy then, the United Kingdom, remains a powerful industrial economy today, its size roughly comparable to France and Italy; Germany is still the economic powerhouse of Central Europe, as it was then.A century ago, Japan’s industrial prowess was just beginning to gain notice, however, and it would not become a major industrial power until the 1930s. A century ago, Korea had just begun to industrialize, something hardly anyone noticed, but today it is a major, fully industrialized country with state-of -the-art technology in many fields. Japan and Korea are striking examples of industrial development precisely because the new entrants to advanced industrial status are so few—or so familiar in their long-run continuity In 1900, a sage might have predicted this outcome for Japan, but no one but a clairvoyant would have picked Korea. South Korea’s growth thus strikes observers as rapid, unusual, even miraculous. So how did it happen?
[1] Donald S. Zagoria,et al. The Origins of the Korean War , 1981 .
[2] W. Goldfrank,et al. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. , 1982 .
[3] A. Amsden. Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization , 1991 .
[4] James B. Palais. Politics and Policy in Traditional Korea , 1976, The Journal of Asian Studies.