4. The quiet demise of variable rules

T HE VARIABLE RULE WAS INTRODUCED BY William Labov in a classic analysis of the copula/auxiliary in Vernacular Black English (Labov 1969). However, the most thoroughly examined variable phenomenon in linguistics may well be the deletion of a final [t] or [d] in English. This deletion has almost always been examined in nonstandard kinds of English such as VBE and the English of Puerto Rican speakers in cities of the northeastern United States, but there is no doubt that it is a general variable process in anyone's English. One of the most detailed studies was done by Wolfram (1974). He presents detailed quantitative data on the deletion of [d] after English vowels. Although the speakers providing the data were young men of Puerto Rican ethnicity from New York City, other research indicates that the variable constraints Wolfram confirmed have nothing to do with these speakers' Spanish-speaking background but are generally valid for English. He tested the following three pairs of variable constraints. The symbol "#" is a "formative boundary" marker and means the following [d] is GRAMMATICAL, that is, it represents the -ed suffix.1

[1]  W. Labov Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula , 1969, Language.

[2]  David Sankoff,et al.  Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods , 1978 .

[3]  Paul Kay,et al.  On the logic of variable rules , 1979, Language in Society.

[4]  Sylvain Bromberger Why phonology is different , 1989 .

[5]  R. Fasold,et al.  The language-planning effect of newspaper editorial policy: Gender differences in The Washington Post , 1990, Language in Society.

[6]  Roger W. Shuy,et al.  Language use and the uses of language , 1983 .

[7]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[8]  Charles James Nice Bailey Variation and linguistic theory , 1973 .

[9]  Deborah Schiffrin,et al.  Language change and variation , 1989 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[11]  Beatriz R. Lavandera Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? , 1978, Language in Society.

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[13]  Walt Wolfram,et al.  The Linguistic Variable: Fact and Fantasy , 1991 .

[14]  F. Newmeyer Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey , 1989 .

[15]  W. Labov The social stratification of English in New York City , 1969 .

[16]  Ronald R. Butters,et al.  Competence, Performance, and Variable Rules. , 1972 .

[17]  W. Wolfram,et al.  Structural variability in phonological development: Final nasals in Vernacular Black English , 1989 .

[18]  Henrietta J. Cedergren,et al.  Variable Rules: Performance as a Statistical Reflection of Competence , 1974 .

[19]  David Sankoff,et al.  Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation , 1988 .

[20]  S. Jacobson Some approaches to syntactic variation , 1989 .

[21]  Alan Ford A closer look at some so-called variable processes , 1989 .

[22]  Some problems in defining syntactic variables: The case of WH questions in Montreal French , 1989 .

[23]  Charles‐James N. Bailey Variation theory and so-called‘sociolinguistic grammars’ , 1987 .

[24]  William Labov,et al.  On the uses of variable rules , 1979, Language in Society.

[25]  Suzanne Romaine,et al.  Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities , 1982 .

[26]  Charles‐James N. Bailey Theory, description and differences among linguists (or, what keeps linguistics from becoming a science) , 1981 .

[27]  J. Singler Plural Marking in Liberian Settler English, 1820-1980 , 1989 .

[28]  W. O. Dingwall A survey of linguistic science , 1978 .

[29]  Jenny Cheshire Syntactic variation, the linguistic variable, and sociolinguistic theory , 1987 .

[30]  W. Labov,et al.  Constraints on the agentless passive , 1983, Journal of Linguistics.