Drawing power of virtual crowds

In 1969, social psychologist Milgram and his colleagues conducted an experiment on a busy city street where passers-by witnessed a set of actors spontaneously looking up towards a building. The experiment showed that the crowd's propensity to mimic the actor's gaze increased with the number of actors that looked up. This form of behavioural contagion is found in many social organisms and is central to how information travels through large groups. With the advancement of virtual reality and its continued application towards understanding human response to crowd behaviour, it remains to be verified if behavioural contagion occurs in walkable virtual environments, and how it compares with results from real-world experiments. In this study, we adapt Milgram's experiment for virtual environments and use it to reproduce behavioural contagion. Specifically, we construct a replica of an indoor location and combine two established pedestrian motion models to create an interactive crowd of 60 virtual characters that walk through the indoor location. The stimulus group comprised a subset of the characters who look up at a random time as the participants explore the virtual environment. Our results show that the probability of looking up by a participant is dependent on the size of the stimulus group saturating to near certainty when three or more characters look up. The role of stimulus size was also evident when participant actions were compared with survey responses which showed that more participants selected to not look up even though they saw characters redirect their gaze upwards when the size of the stimulus group was small. Participants also spent more time looking up and exhibited frequent head turns with a larger stimulus group. Results from this study provide evidence that behavioural contagion can be triggered in the virtual environment, and can be used to build and test complex hypotheses for understanding human behaviour in a variety of crowd scenarios.

[1]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Simulating Movement Interactions Between Avatars & Agents in Virtual Worlds Using Human Motion Constraints , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).

[2]  Rahul Narain,et al.  Uncertainty Models for TTC-Based Collision-Avoidance , 2017, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[3]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Evaluating collision avoidance effects on discomfort in virtual environments , 2017, 2017 IEEE Virtual Humans and Crowds for Immersive Environments (VHCIE).

[4]  Li Li,et al.  The Accuracy and Precision of Position and Orientation Tracking in the HTC Vive Virtual Reality System for Scientific Research , 2017, i-Perception.

[5]  Sachit Butail,et al.  The effect of instructional priming on postural responses to virtual crowds , 2017, 2017 IEEE Virtual Humans and Crowds for Immersive Environments (VHCIE).

[6]  Marco Gamba,et al.  BORIS: a free, versatile open‐source event‐logging software for video/audio coding and live observations , 2016 .

[7]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Crowd behaviour during high-stress evacuations in an immersive virtual environment , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Psychological Parameters for Crowd Simulation: From Audiences to Mobs , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  Max Kinateder,et al.  Social Influence on Evacuation Behavior in Real and Virtual Environments , 2016, Front. Robot. AI.

[10]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Virtual Crowds: Steps Toward Behavioral Realism , 2015, Virtual Crowds: Steps Toward Behavioral Realism.

[11]  William L. Romey,et al.  Flash Expansion Threshold in Whirligig Swarms , 2015, PloS one.

[12]  Aditya Jain,et al.  A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students , 2015, International journal of applied & basic medical research.

[13]  Colin R. Twomey,et al.  Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Ioannis Karamouzas,et al.  Universal power law governing pedestrian interactions. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[15]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Initiation and spread of escape waves within animal groups , 2014, Royal Society Open Science.

[16]  D A Paley,et al.  The effects of flow on schooling Devario aequipinnatus: school structure, startle response and information transmission. , 2014, Journal of fish biology.

[17]  Winnie Daamen,et al.  The Many Roles of the Relaxation time Parameter in Force based Models of Pedestrian Dynamics , 2014 .

[18]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Modelling collective decision making in groups and crowds: Integrating social contagion and interacting emotions, beliefs and intentions , 2013, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[19]  H. Hlavacs,et al.  Is Virtual Reality made for Men only? Exploring Gender Differences in the Sense of Presence , 2012 .

[20]  Milind Tambe,et al.  A Study of Emotional Contagion with Virtual Characters , 2012, IVA.

[21]  Simon Garnier,et al.  Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  G. Beauchamp Flock size and density influence speed of escape waves in semipalmated sandpipers , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[24]  Giorgio Parisi,et al.  Propagating waves in starling, Sturnus vulgaris, flocks under predation , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Stephen V. Shepherd,et al.  Following Gaze: Gaze-Following Behavior as a Window into Social Cognition , 2010, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[26]  G. Csibra,et al.  Natural pedagogy , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Social influence during the initial phase of a fire evacuation—Analysis of evacuation experiments in a cinema theatre , 2009 .

[28]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Virtual Crowds: Methods, Simulation, and Control , 2008, Virtual Crowds: Methods, Simulation, and Control.

[29]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  András Kocsor,et al.  ROC analysis: applications to the classification of biological sequences and 3D structures , 2008, Briefings Bioinform..

[31]  P. Mundy,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Attention, Joint Attention, and Social Cognition , 2022 .

[32]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments , 2006, PloS one.

[33]  Edwin H. Blake,et al.  Conceptual priming as a determinant of presence in virtual environments , 2003, AFRIGRAPH '03.

[34]  Sigal G. Barsade The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and its Influence on Group Behavior , 2002 .

[35]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[36]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[37]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[38]  Clark McPhail,et al.  Blumer's Theory of Collective Behavior: The Development of a Non-Symbolic Interaction Explanation , 1989 .

[39]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[40]  Ann Cavoukian,et al.  Environmental Determinants of Behavioral Contagion: Density and Number , 1980 .

[41]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  S. Milgram,et al.  Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. , 1969 .