A single peptide-major histocompatibility complex ligand triggers digital cytokine secretion in CD4(+) T cells.

We have developed a single-molecule imaging technique that uses quantum-dot-labeled peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) ligands to study CD4(+) T cell functional sensitivity. We found that naive T cells, T cell blasts, and memory T cells could all be triggered by a single pMHC to secrete tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) cytokines with a rate of ∼1,000, ∼10,000, and ∼10,000 molecules/min, respectively, and that additional pMHCs did not augment secretion, indicating a digital response pattern. We also found that a single pMHC localized to the immunological synapse induced the slow formation of a long-lasting T cell receptor (TCR) cluster, consistent with a serial engagement mechanism. These data show that scaling up CD4(+) T cell cytokine responses involves increasingly efficient T cell recruitment rather than greater cytokine production per cell.

[1]  Emil R. Unanue,et al.  Quantitation of antigen-presenting cell MHC class II/peptide complexes necessary for T-cell stimulation , 1990, Nature.

[2]  Ronald N Germain,et al.  Modeling T Cell Antigen Discrimination Based on Feedback Control of Digital ERK Responses , 2005, PLoS biology.

[3]  M. Croft,et al.  Naive versus memory CD4 T cell response to antigen. Memory cells are less dependent on accessory cell costimulation and can respond to many antigen-presenting cell types including resting B cells. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[4]  M. Groudine,et al.  Enhancers increase the probability but not the level of gene expression. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Mark M Davis,et al.  T cells use two directionally distinct pathways for cytokine secretion , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[6]  M. Davis,et al.  Antigen-specific development of primary and memory T cells in vivo. , 1995, Science.

[7]  Jayajit Das,et al.  Digital Signaling and Hysteresis Characterize Ras Activation in Lymphoid Cells , 2009, Cell.

[8]  S Miltenyi,et al.  Analysis and sorting of live cells according to secreted molecules, relocated to a cell-surface affinity matrix. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Dahan,et al.  Probing cellular events, one quantum dot at a time , 2010, Nature Methods.

[10]  S. Dzik,et al.  The immunological synapse: A molecular machine controlling T cell activation , 2000 .

[11]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. , 1999, Science.

[12]  M. Davis,et al.  Differential clustering of CD4 and CD3zeta during T cell recognition. , 2000, Science.

[13]  R. Tsien,et al.  The Dynamic Control of Kiss-And-Run and Vesicular Reuse Probed with Single Nanoparticles , 2009, Science.

[14]  Z Reich,et al.  Ligand recognition by alpha beta T cell receptors. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[15]  P. A. van der Merwe,et al.  T-cell receptor triggering is critically dependent on the dimensions of its peptide-MHC ligand , 2005, Nature.

[16]  H. Eisen,et al.  Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response. , 1996, Immunity.

[17]  H. Grey,et al.  The minimal number of antigen‐major histocompatibility complex class II complexes required for activation of naive and primed T cells , 1997, European journal of immunology.

[18]  Ronald H. Schwartz,et al.  IL-2 Secretion by CD4+ T Cells In Vivo Is Rapid, Transient, and Influenced by TCR-Specific Competition , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[19]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of T cell receptor signaling with a photoactivatable agonist. , 2007, Immunity.

[20]  G. Nolan,et al.  Single cell assay of a transcription factor reveals a threshold in transcription activated by signals emanating from the T-cell antigen receptor. , 1990, Genes & development.

[21]  Rajat Varma,et al.  T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. , 2006, Immunity.

[22]  Morgan Huse,et al.  Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity , 2005, Nature.

[23]  Nam Ki Lee,et al.  Single-molecule approach to molecular biology in living bacterial cells. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[24]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  The kinetics of two dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T cell responsiveness , 2010, Nature.

[25]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76 , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[26]  Douglas A. Lauffenburger,et al.  Polyfunctional responses by human T cells result from sequential release of cytokines , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  C. Wülfing,et al.  T cell receptor (TCR) clustering in the immunological synapse integrates TCR and costimulatory signaling in selected T cells. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Mark M Davis,et al.  T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[29]  M. Naramura,et al.  Mice with a fluorescent marker for interleukin 2 gene activation. , 1998, Immunity.

[30]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  miR-181a Is an Intrinsic Modulator of T Cell Sensitivity and Selection , 2007, Cell.

[31]  Colin R. F. Monks,et al.  Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells , 1998, Nature.

[32]  Evan W. Newell,et al.  TCR–peptide–MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity , 2010, Nature.

[33]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Low ligand requirement for deletion and lack of synapses in positive selection enforce the gauntlet of thymic T cell maturation. , 2008, Immunity.

[34]  Simon J Davis,et al.  The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[35]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Continuous T cell receptor signaling required for synapse maintenance and full effector potential , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[36]  D. Nesbitt,et al.  Solution control of radiative and nonradiative lifetimes: a novel contribution to quantum dot blinking suppression. , 2008, Nano letters.

[37]  B. Alarcón,et al.  Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[38]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.

[39]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[40]  S. Bromley,et al.  A supramolecular basis for CD45 tyrosine phosphatase regulation in sustained T cell activation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  CD4+ T-cell synapses involve multiple distinct stages , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  J. Groves,et al.  Receptor signaling clusters in the immune synapse. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[43]  R. Gallo,et al.  Functional and morphologic characterization of human T cells continuously grown in vitro. , 1977, Journal of immunology.

[44]  Mark M Davis,et al.  TCR and Lat are expressed on separate protein islands on T cell membranes and concatenate during activation , 2010, Nature Immunology.

[45]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Actin and agonist MHC–peptide complex–dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[46]  D. Zaller,et al.  Staging and resetting T cell activation in SMACs , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[47]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[48]  R. Vale,et al.  Biophysical Mechanism of T Cell Receptor Triggering in a Reconstituted System , 2012, Nature.

[49]  H. Grey,et al.  The minimal number of class II MHC-antigen complexes needed for T cell activation. , 1990, Science.

[50]  M. Howarth,et al.  Mechanisms for size-dependent protein segregation at immune synapses assessed with molecular rulers. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Photocrosslinkable pMHC monomers stain T cells specifically and cause ligand-bound TCRs to be 'preferentially' transported to the cSMAC , 2012, Nature Immunology.

[52]  R. Gerstein,et al.  Maturation-Dependent Licensing of Naive T Cells for Rapid TNF Production , 2010, PloS one.

[53]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Determination of the Relationship Between T Cell Responsiveness and the Number of MHC-Peptide Complexes Using Specific Monoclonal Antibodies1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[54]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  Adhesion receptors of the immune system , 1990, Nature.

[55]  Shimon Weiss,et al.  Tracking bio‐molecules in live cells using quantum dots , 2008, Journal of biophotonics.

[56]  L. Bradley,et al.  T cell memory. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[57]  R. Moqbel,et al.  Differential Secretion of Cytokines , 2006, Science's STKE.

[58]  José M. López.  Digital kinases , 2010, Communicative & integrative biology.

[59]  Walter H. Moos,et al.  Comparison of the proteolytic susceptibilities of homologous L‐amino acid, D‐amino acid, and N‐substituted glycine peptide and peptoid oligomers , 1995 .

[60]  Ronald H. Schwartz,et al.  Selective, stable demethylation of the interleukin-2 gene enhances transcription by an active process , 2003, Nature Immunology.