This paper analyzes the offshoring of innovative activity, and the circumstances and implications of the global spread of corporate R&D. Economists are largely in agreement on the importance of continued innovation as the primary way to create high-paying new jobs in the US, therefore offshoring's unrelenting upward climb on the value-chain is fueling concerns regarding future competitiveness of the US economy. While US R&D expenditures, patent generation and productivity growth have been consistently robust, both data at the national level and firm interviews raise concern for the cost-effectiveness of R&D spending, leading to firms looking for greater returns, sometimes through offshoring. The increasingly global sales of firms are forcing them to "design to market," and the complex, interdisciplinary nature of modern research and its skill requirements are compelling some of them to outsource and offshore their innovative activity and access global R&D talent. The paper traces the evolution of offshoring activity, analyzes the reasons that have led to the offshoring of R&D, as well as the global conditions that have facilitated this phenomenon. It also presents the results of a survey that suggest that mostly large firms resort to offshoring of R&D, primarily under the aegis of captive, affiliated operations. At the same time, it is the small firms (less than 500 employees) that are more innovative, and are more likely to carry out their R&D entirely in the US. It is possible that the future of R&D offshoring will include continued innovation and the creation of high value-added jobs in Silicon Valley, leading to a win-win situation where the US develops/markets the "new" good, and the now "routinized" goods and services are offshored. On the other hand, there exists the distinct possibility of major innovations originating abroad. The paper concludes with some discussion of policy issues.
[1]
A. Bardhan.
On Intra-Firm Trade and Multinationals: Foreign Outsourcing and Offshoring in Manufacturing
,
2004
.
[2]
Dwight M. Jaffee.
Globalization, Offshoring, and Economic Convergence: A Synthesis
,
2005
.
[3]
D. Teece,et al.
Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous?
,
2002
.
[4]
Bronwyn H Hall.
Exploring the Patent Explosion
,
2004,
The Journal of Technology Transfer.
[5]
M. Baily,et al.
The Productivity Slowdown, Measurement Issues, and the Explosion of Computer Power
,
1989
.
[6]
Does Globalization of the Scientific/Engineering Workforce Threaten U.S. Economic Leadership?
,
2006
.
[7]
Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.
Patent Paradox Revisited: Determinants of Patenting in the Us Semiconductor Industry, 1980-94
,
1999
.
[8]
A. Bardhan,et al.
Competitiveness and an Emerging Sector: The Russian Software Industry and its Global Linkages
,
2006
.
[9]
D. Comín.
R&D: A Small Contribution to Productivity Growth
,
2002
.
[10]
P. David.
The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox
,
1990
.
[11]
K. Walsh.
Foreign High-Tech R&D in China: Risks
,
2003
.