Creativity and interdisciplinarity: one creativity or many creativities?

Psychologists and educators frequently debate whether creativity and problem solving are domain-general—applicable to all disciplines and tasks—or domain-specific—tailored to specific disciplines and tasks. In this paper, we briefly review the major arguments for both positions, identify conceptual and empirical weaknesses of both perspectives, and describe two relatively new hybrid models that attempt to address ways in which creativity and innovation are both domain-general and domain-specific.

[1]  R. Weisberg Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius , 1993 .

[2]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[3]  John Baer The Case for Domain Specificity of Creativity , 1998 .

[4]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[5]  John Baer,et al.  Creativity across domains : faces of the muse , 2005 .

[6]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  S. Dollinger,et al.  Note on Consensual Assessment Technique in Creativity Research , 2005, Perceptual and motor skills.

[8]  J. Plucker,et al.  Looking outside and inside: Self-Concept Development of Gifted Adolescents , 2001 .

[9]  K. Thompson Cognitive and Analytical Psychology Howard Gardner .Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, Basic Books, 1983. , 1985 .

[10]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Rethinking Multipotentiality Among the Intellectually Gifted: A Critical Review and Recommendations , 1997 .

[11]  J. Plucker Student Responses to Creativity Checklists: Evidence of Content Generality. , 1996 .

[12]  J. Plucker Beware of Simple Conclusions: The Case for Content Generality of Creativity , 1998 .

[13]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: "It was never there and already it's vanishing." , 1996 .

[14]  P. Salomone,et al.  Difficult Cases in Career Counseling: III—The Multipotentialed Client , 1988 .

[15]  D. Lubinski,et al.  States of excellence. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[16]  J. Richards,et al.  Academic and nonacademic accomplishment: correlated or uncorrelated? , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[17]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Stability of vocational interests among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: a 15-year longitudinal study. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  The nature of insight , 1996 .

[19]  John Baer Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task-Specific Approach , 1993 .

[20]  D. Hocevar,et al.  Dimensionality of Creativity , 1976, Psychological reports.

[21]  M. Runco,et al.  Implicit Theories of Artistic, Scientific, and Everyday Creativity* , 1986 .

[22]  James C. Kaufman,et al.  Hawking's Haiku, Madonna's Math: Why It Is Hard to Be Creative in Every Room of the House. , 2004 .

[23]  B. Shore,et al.  Multipotentiality, Giftedness, and Career Choice: A Review , 1999 .

[24]  R. Sternberg Implicit theories of intelligence. creativity, and wisdom , 1985 .

[25]  John Baer,et al.  A Comparison of Expert and Nonexpert Raters Using the Consensual Assessment Technique , 2008 .

[26]  R. Beghetto,et al.  Why Creativity Is Domain General, Why It Looks Domain Specific, and Why the Distinction Does Not Matter. , 2004 .

[27]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. , 1996 .

[28]  J. G. Gómez,et al.  What Do We Know About Creativity , 2007 .

[29]  John Baer Why You Shouldn't Trust Creativity Tests. , 1994 .

[30]  J. Plucker,et al.  Creativity Through a Lens of Social Responsibility: Implicit Theories of Creativity with Korean Samples , 2001 .

[31]  M. Magovčević The Importance of Context , 2003 .

[32]  Weiping Hu,et al.  A scientific creativity test for secondary school students , 2002 .

[33]  B. Kerr A Handbook for Counseling the Gifted and Talented. , 1991 .

[34]  J. Renzulli What Makes Giftedness?: Reexamining a Definition , 2011 .

[35]  Joseph S. Renzulli,et al.  Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement , 2023, Possibility Studies & Society.

[36]  S. Barab,et al.  Conceptions of Giftedness: The Importance of Contexts in Theories of Giftedness: Learning to Embrace the Messy Joys of Subjectivity , 2005 .

[37]  P. Olszewski-Kubilius The Role of the Family in Talent Development , 2008 .

[38]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way , 2009 .

[39]  Why You Still Shouldn't Trust Creativity Tests. , 1994 .

[40]  M. Chi Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. , 1997 .

[41]  R. Beghetto,et al.  Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research , 2004 .

[42]  D. Simonton Great Psychologists and Their Times: Scientific Insights into Psychology's History , 2002 .

[43]  Frances C. Grafton,et al.  Correlations among Cognitive Abilities Are Lower for Higher Ability Groups. , 1996 .

[44]  N. Kogan Diverging From Divergent Thinking , 1994 .

[45]  E. Hong,et al.  Multipotential Abilities and Vocational Interests in Gifted Adolescents: Fact or Fiction? , 1999 .

[46]  R. Helson One Surprise After Another , 2008, Journal of personality assessment.

[47]  M. Runco Parents' and Teachers' Implicit Theories of Children's Creativity. , 1993 .

[48]  S. Barab,et al.  Smart People or Smart Contexts? Cognition, Ability, and Talent Development in an Age of Situated Approaches to Knowing and Learning , 2002 .

[49]  Jiliang Shen,et al.  The Influence of CASE on Scientific Creativity , 2003 .

[50]  J. L. Holland,et al.  Prediction of academic and extra-curricular achievement in college. , 1964 .

[51]  N. Robinson The role of universities and colleges in educating gifted undergraduates , 1997 .

[52]  B. Kerr Smart girls, gifted women , 1985 .

[53]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Judgments of the Creativity of Artwork From Students and Professional Artists , 1994 .