The ultrametric correlation matrix for modelling hierarchical latent concepts

Many relevant multidimensional phenomena are defined by nested latent concepts, which can be represented by a tree-structure supposing a hierarchical relationship among manifest variables. The root of the tree is a general concept which includes more specific ones. The aim of the paper is to reconstruct an observed data correlation matrix of manifest variables through an ultrametric correlation matrix which is able to pinpoint the hierarchical nature of the phenomenon under study. With this scope, we introduce a novel model which detects consistent latent concepts and their relationships starting from the observed correlation matrix.

[1]  Gilles E. Gignac.  The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better , 2016 .

[2]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[3]  C. Spearman.  The Abilities of Man their Nature and Measurement , 2020, Nature.

[4]  Matthijs J. Warrens,et al.  Some Relationships Between Cronbach’s Alpha and the Spearman-Brown Formula , 2015, J. Classif..

[5]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[6]  David Thissen,et al.  On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model , 1999 .

[7]  J. Tukey,et al.  Multiple-Factor Analysis , 1947 .

[8]  J. Gustafsson,et al.  The Hierarchical Organization of Cognitive Abilities: Restoring General Intelligence Through the Use of Linear Structural Relations (LISREL). , 1987, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Exploratory Bi-Factor Analysis , 2011, Psychometrika.

[10]  John Schmid,et al.  The development of hierarchical factor solutions , 1957 .

[11]  Peter M Bentler,et al.  Exploratory Bi-factor Analysis: The Oblique Case , 2012, Psychometrika.

[12]  Harold P. Bechtoldt,et al.  An empirical study of the factor analysis stability hypothesis , 1961 .

[13]  C. Spearman.  CORRELATION CALCULATED FROM FAULTY DATA , 1910 .

[14]  H. Blalock.  Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research , 1966 .

[15]  Stanley A. Mulaik,et al.  First Order or Higher Order General Factor , 1997 .

[16]  R. Cattell.  The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral and Life Sciences , 2012 .

[17]  R. Wherry.  Hierarchical factor solutions without rotation , 1959 .

[18]  Willem H. Haemers,et al.  Spectra of Graphs , 2011 .

[19]  Yutaka Kano,et al.  EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS WITH A COMMON FACTOR WITH TWO INDICATORS , 1997 .

[20]  K. Holzinger,et al.  The Bi-factor method , 1937 .

[21]  D. Rindskopf,et al.  Some Theory and Applications of Confirmatory Second-Order Factor Analysis. , 1988, Multivariate behavioral research.

[22]  J. Carroll.  Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .

[23]  H. M. Walker,et al.  The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability. , 1947 .

[24]  H. G. Osburn.  Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. , 2000 .

[25]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[26]  W. Brown.  SOME EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS IN THE CORRELATION OF MENTAL ABILITIES1 , 1910 .