Combination of signals from array coils using image‐based estimation of coil sensitivity profiles

It is well established that the optimal unbiased way to combine image data from array coils is a pixel‐by‐pixel sum of coil signals, with each signal weighted by the individual coil sensitivity at the location of the pixel. A pragmatic alternative combines the images from the coils as the square root of the sum of squares (SOS), which can reduce the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and introduce bias. This work describes how to replace coil sensitivity by an image‐derived quantity that enables close to optimal signal combination up to a global intensity scaling. Typical scaling is by an individual coil sensitivity or a linear or SOS combination of the sensitivities of some or all of the coils in the array. The method decreases signal bias, improves SNR when coils have unequal noise levels, and can reduce image artifacts. It can produce phase‐corrected data, which eliminates bias completely. In addition, the method allows images from arrays that include highly localized coils, such as a prostate coil and external pelvic array, to be combined with near‐optimal SNR and an intensity modulation that makes them easier to view. Magn Reson Med 47:539–548, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Fast MRI data acquisition using multiple detectors , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  P. Roemer,et al.  Noise correlations in data simultaneously acquired from multiple surface coil arrays , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  P. Roemer,et al.  The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  J B Ra,et al.  Fast imaging using subencoding data sets from multiple detectors , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  I. Young,et al.  A solid reusable endorectal receiver coil for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: Design, use, and comparison with an inflatable endorectal coil , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  W. Manning,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[9]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  D. O. Walsh,et al.  Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  D. Kacher,et al.  Sensitivity profiles from an array of coils for encoding and reconstruction in parallel (SPACE RIP) , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  D. Larkman,et al.  Use of multicoil arrays for separation of signal from multiple slices simultaneously excited , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  J V Hajnal,et al.  An investigation into the use of sensitivity‐encoded techniques to increase temporal resolution in dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast imaging , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Mark Bydder,et al.  Generalized SMASH imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.