Testing the effectiveness of simplified search strategies for updating systematic reviews.

[1]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  Complementary approaches to searching MEDLINE may be sufficient for updating systematic reviews. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  L. Peirson,et al.  Interventions for prevention and treatment of tobacco smoking in school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Preventive medicine.

[3]  T. Trikalinos,et al.  Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  Mark Petticrew,et al.  Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[5]  D. Moher,et al.  The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[6]  Lorie A. Kloda,et al.  There are no randomized controlled trials that support the United States Preventive Services Task Force guideline on screening for depression in primary care: a systematic review , 2014, BMC Medicine.

[7]  S. Waffenschmidt,et al.  Simple search techniques in PubMed are potentially suitable for evaluating the completeness of systematic reviews. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  R. Falk,et al.  Overdiagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer due to Mammography Screening , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Su Golder,et al.  Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological Overview , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[10]  Isabelle Boutron,et al.  Reporting of safety results in published reports of randomized controlled trials. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  P. Dahm,et al.  Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials published in the urological literature. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[12]  K. Shojania,et al.  Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  I. Boutron,et al.  Reporting of Harm in Randomized, Controlled Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Rheumatic Disease , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service (PLUS) performed well for identifying new studies for updated Cochrane reviews. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  J. Sterne,et al.  How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. , 2003, Health technology assessment.