On the internal multivariate quality control of analytical laboratories. A case study: the quality of drinking water

Abstract Multivariate statistical process control (MSPC) tools, based on principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares (PLS) regression and other regression models, are used in the present study for automatic detection of possible errors in the methods used for routine multiparametric analysis in order to design an internal Multivariate Analytical Quality Control (iMAQC) program. Such tools could notice possible failures in the analytical methods without resorting to any external reference since they use their own analytical results as a source for the diagnosis of the method's quality. Pseudo-univariate control charts provide an attractive alternative to traditional univariate and multivariate control charts. This approach uses the relative prediction error in percentage, Er (%), which is calculated from a multivariate model such as PLS, as the univariate control variable. Er offers quantitative information on the magnitude of the error and is sensitive to systematic errors at the 10% level (which are of analytical interest). Finally, its capacity to detect/quantify error in a single method can be checked a priori. As a case study for applying such strategies in routine analysis, the problem of the quality of drinking water was examined.

[1]  T. Isaksson,et al.  New approach for distance measurement in locally weighted regression , 1994 .

[2]  Annarosa Mangone,et al.  Characterisation of mineral waters by pattern recognition methods , 1998 .

[3]  Javier Andrade,et al.  Selection of analytical variables to optimize laboratory efforts in future groundwater studies , 1994 .

[4]  Pierluigi Barbieri,et al.  A chemometric survey of three sites in Muggia Bay (Northern Adriatic Sea): meteorological effects on heavy metal patterns in surface coastal waters , 1998 .

[5]  Salvador Sagrado,et al.  Multivariate quality control studies applied to Ca(II) and Mg(II) determination by a portable method , 1998 .

[6]  M. P. Callao,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Process Control Applied to SulfateDetermination by Sequential Injection Analysis , 1997 .

[7]  Eamonn Mullins,et al.  Introduction to control charts in the analytical laboratory. Tutorial review , 1994 .

[8]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivariate projection methods , 1995 .

[9]  John F. MacGregor,et al.  Using On‐Line Process Data to Improve Quality: Challenges for Statisticians * , 1997 .

[10]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[11]  C. L. Stork,et al.  Identification of Multiple Sensor Disturbances during Process Monitoring , 1997 .

[12]  K. James,et al.  Rapid determination of volatile organic compounds in environmentally hazardous wastewaters using solid phase microextraction , 1997 .

[13]  Karl-Werner Schramm,et al.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Ya-Er Lake (Hubei, China): sources and distribution , 1997 .

[14]  Catherine Porte,et al.  Automation and optimization of glycine synthesis , 1996 .

[15]  Bo Karlberg,et al.  Screening method for metals based on array spectrophotometry and multivariate analysis , 1996 .

[16]  B. R. Kowalski,et al.  Process Analytical Chemistry , 1988, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards.

[17]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  Data correlation, number of significant principal components and shape of molecules. The K correlation index , 1997 .

[18]  Salvador Sagrado,et al.  An environmental study by factor analysis of surface seawaters in the Gulf of Valencia (Western Mediterranean) , 1999 .