Quantum gravity on the lattice

I review the lattice approach to quantum gravity, and how it relates to the non-trivial ultraviolet fixed point scenario of the continuum theory. After a brief introduction covering the general problem of ultraviolet divergences in gravity and other non-renormalizable theories, I discuss the general methods and goals of the lattice approach. An underlying theme is the attempt at establishing connections between the continuum renormalization group results, which are mainly based on diagrammatic perturbation theory, and the recent lattice results, which apply to the strong gravity regime and are inherently non-perturbative. A second theme in this review is the ever-present natural correspondence between infrared methods of strongly coupled non-abelian gauge theories on the one hand, and the low energy approach to quantum gravity based on the renormalization group and universality of critical behavior on the other. Towards the end of the review I discuss possible observational consequences of path integral quantum gravity, as derived from the non-trivial ultraviolet fixed point scenario. I argue that the theoretical framework naturally leads to considering a weakly scale-dependent Newton’s constant, with a scaling violation parameter related to the observed scaled cosmological constant (and not, as naively expected, to the Planck length).

[1]  Herbert W. Hamber,et al.  Quantum Gravitation: The Feynman Path Integral Approach , 2008 .

[2]  W. Yao,et al.  Review of Particle Physics (2006) , 2006 .

[3]  J. Hartle.  Simplicial minisuperspace I. General discussion , 1985 .

[4]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[5]  Newtonian potential in quantum Regge gravity , 1994, hep-th/9406163.

[6]  Yoshihisa Kitazawa,et al.  Two-loop prediction for scaling exponents in (2 + ϵ)-dimensional quantum gravity , 1996 .

[7]  G. Parisi.  On Non-Renormalizable Interactions , 1977 .

[8]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[9]  H. Leutwyler.  Gravitational field: Equivalence of Feynman quantization and canonical quantization , 1964 .

[10]  Yoshihisa Kitazawa,et al.  Ultraviolet stable fixed point and scaling relations in (2 + ϵ)-dimensional quantum gravity☆ , 1993 .

[11]  Robert Schrader,et al.  On the curvature of piecewise flat spaces , 1984 .

[12]  Modanese.  Geodesic round trips by parallel transport in quantum gravity. , 1993, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[13]  Richard Phillips Feynman,et al.  Lectures on gravitation , 1971 .

[14]  Hayes,et al.  Review of Particle Physics. , 1996, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[15]  C. Itzykson.  Fields on a Random Lattice , 1984 .

[16]  K. Symanzik.  Euclidean Quantum field theory , 1969 .

[17]  I. M. Singer,et al.  Progress in Gauge Field Theory , 1984 .

[18]  S. Hawking,et al.  General Relativity; an Einstein Centenary Survey , 1979 .

[19]  H. Hamber.  Phases of simplicial quantum gravity in four dimensions Estimates for the critical exponents , 1993 .

[20]  V. N. Popov,et al.  Covariant quantization of the gravitational field , 1974 .

[21]  J. Zinn-Justin.  Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena , 2002 .

[22]  C. Misner.  Feynman Quantization of General Relativity , 1957 .

[23]  James B. Hartle,et al.  Wave Function of the Universe , 1983 .

[24]  T. Regge.  General relativity without coordinates , 1961 .

[25]  Barry Simon,et al.  The P(φ)[2] Euclidean (quantum) field theory , 1974 .

[26]  B. Dewitt.  QUANTUM THEORY OF GRAVITY. II. THE MANIFESTLY COVARIANT THEORY. , 1967 .

[27]  Tullio Regge,et al.  Discrete structures in gravity , 2000 .

[28]  Kenneth G. Wilson,et al.  Feynman graph expansion for critical exponents , 1972 .