Event Monitoring and Evaluation by Community Pharmacists in Japan: A Pilot Study on Fenofibrate and Pemafibrate

Background: The Japan Pharmaceutical Association has conducted drug event monitoring to detect drug events related to pemafibrate. As there are a few studies on the safety of pemafibrate in clinical settings, a pilot study evaluating the association between drug use and detected events was performed in Japan. Aims: In this study, the association between detected events and the use of pemafibrate, utilizing pharmacy records maintained by community pharmacists, was investigated. We identified the new-user cohort using a test and active comparison drug and collected the baseline information. An active comparison group comprising new users was used to assess the events. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using questionnaires regarding baseline and event data was conducted by community pharmacists belonging to the Japan Pharmaceutical Association. The incidence of event and estimated hazard ratio were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model that was adjusted for confounding factors, such as age and sex. Results: A total of 1294 patients using pemafibrate and 508 patients using fenofibrate were identified as new drug users. The most reported events involving suspected adverse reactions and add-on drugs were increased blood pressure and lipid-lowering effects with pemafibrate use, and nasopharyngitis, pruritus, dizziness, and lipid-lowering effects with fenofibrate use. No significant differences were found in commonly occurring events, except that an add-on anti-hypertensive drug has been used by pemafibrate users compared to fenofibrate users. Conclusion: This study conducted by pharmacists can facilitate the safety assessment of newly marketed drugs, as few drug use investigations with a comparator are carried out by the Japanese authority for pharmaceutical companies. However, further research is required.

[1]  M. Kimura,et al.  Safety of elobixibat and lubiprostone in Japanese patients with chronic constipation: a retrospective cohort study , 2021, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[2]  ESC / EAS Guidelines for the Treatment of Dyslipidemias: Lipid Modification to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk , 2020, Digital Doctor.

[3]  Ryoji Gunji,et al.  1.The Survey of Trends on Japanese Post-marketing Study after Enforcement of Revised Good Post-marketing Study Practice (GPSP) , 2020 .

[4]  S. Shakir,et al.  Event Monitoring in the UK , 2019, Pharmacoepidemiology.

[5]  M. Sabatine,et al.  2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. , 2019, European heart journal.

[6]  S. Yamashita,et al.  Clinical Applications of a Novel Selective PPARα Modulator, Pemafibrate, in Dyslipidemia and Metabolic Diseases , 2019, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.

[7]  Satoshi Ida,et al.  Efficacy and safety of pemafibrate administration in patients with dyslipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[8]  R. Ohta,et al.  Gatekeeping function of primary care physicians under Japan’s free-access system: a prospective open cohort study involving 14 isolated islands , 2018, Family practice.

[9]  S. Kihara,et al.  Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2017 , 2018, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.

[10]  S. Yamashita,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Fenofibrate in Patients with High Triglyceride and Low HDL Cholesterol Levels: A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial , 2018, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.

[11]  H. Gremmels,et al.  Fibrates in hypertension: where do we stand? , 2018, Journal of hypertension.

[12]  S. Yamashita,et al.  Effects of Pemafibrate, a Novel Selective PPARα Modulator, on Lipid and Glucose Metabolism in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial , 2018, Diabetes Care.

[13]  J. Fruchart Pemafibrate (K-877), a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator for management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia , 2017, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[14]  N. Brown,et al.  Fenofibrate lowers blood pressure in salt-sensitive but not salt-resistant hypertension , 2013, Journal of hypertension.

[15]  K. Rothman,et al.  Beyond randomized controlled trials: A critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studies , 2006, Hepatology.

[16]  M. Harrison‐Woolrych,et al.  The role of the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme in identification of previously unrecognised signals of adverse drug reactions. , 2006, Current drug safety.

[17]  T. Komiyama,et al.  Collection of medical drug information in pharmacies: Drug Event Monitoring (DEM) in Japan. , 2005, Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan.

[18]  P. Austin,et al.  Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  W. Ray,et al.  Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  R. Mann,et al.  Prescription-event monitoring--recent progress and future horizons. , 2002, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[21]  Katsutoshi Tanaka,et al.  Drug use investigation (DUI) and prescription‐event monitoring in Japan (J‐PEM) , 2001, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[22]  I. Edwards,et al.  Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management , 2000, The Lancet.

[23]  Miki Yokotsuka,et al.  The use of a medical dictionary for regulatory activities terminology (MedDRA) in prescription-event monitoring in Japan (J-PEM) , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[24]  Kiyoshi Kubota,et al.  A design for prescription‐event monitoring in Japan (J‐PEM) , 1999, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[25]  J Urquhart,et al.  Channeling bias in the interpretation of drug effects. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  K. Kubota Prescription-Event Monitoring in Japan (J-PEM) , 2002, Drug safety.

[27]  W. Inman,et al.  Prescription-event monitoring: methodology and recent progress. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.