Application of nanofiltration pretreatment to remove divalent ions for economical seawater reverse osmosis desalination

AbstractTo minimize scale formation potential in the applications of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes as a pretreatment unit, relatively loose nanofiltration (NF) membrane systems coupled with ultrafiltration (UF) were used to remove divalent ions from seawater. However, the UF did not reject any ions because of pore size. The rejection of divalent ions by NF was in order of sulfate (>95%), magnesium (>60%), and calcium (>30%) in every rejection experiment based on water recovery rate (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80%). In the UF/NF/RO hybrid pilot system, most of the divalent (>99%) and the monovalent (>97%) ions were effectively rejected with slightly increased divalent ion rejection compared to the UF/RO system. Seawater temperature influenced rejection of ions with regards to either the diffusion- or convection-dominant transport of ions through the membrane pores. Electric power consumption was also compared between the UF/NF/RO process and the UF/RO process. For different salinity conditions (28,000 and 45,000...

[1]  Frederick George Donnan,et al.  Theory of membrane equilibria and membrane potentials in the presence of non-dialysing electrolytes. A contribution to physical-chemical physiology , 1995 .

[2]  William B. Krantz,et al.  Real-time measurement of inorganic fouling of RO desalination membranes using ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry , 1999 .

[3]  J. Schippers,et al.  Monitoring scaling in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane systems , 2000 .

[4]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Integrated membrane operations for seawater desalination , 2002 .

[5]  S. A. Avlonitis,et al.  Operational water cost and productivity improvements for small-size RO desalination plants , 2002 .

[6]  S. Chellam,et al.  Temperature effects on sieving characteristics of thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes: pore size distributions and transport parameters , 2003 .

[7]  N. M. Al-Najem,et al.  Energy consumption in equivalent work by different desalting methods: case study for Kuwait , 2003 .

[8]  M. Busch,et al.  Reducing energy consumption in seawater desalination , 2004 .

[9]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Application of various membranes to remove NOM typically occurring in Korea with respect to DBP, AOC and transport parameters , 2005 .

[10]  Peter Eriksson,et al.  NF membrane characteristics and evaluation for sea water processing applications , 2005 .

[11]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Integrating Membrane Contactors Technology and Pressure-Driven Membrane Operations for Seawater Desalination: Energy, Exergy and Costs Analysis , 2006 .

[12]  A. Karabelas,et al.  A study of selected herbicides retention by nanofiltration membranes—The role of organic fouling , 2006 .

[13]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid—Effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions , 2007 .

[14]  Thomas Melin,et al.  State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[15]  K. Östergren,et al.  The influence of pH, salt and temperature on nanofiltration performance , 2008 .

[17]  Allan R. Chivas,et al.  Coupling effects of feed solution pH and ionic strength on the rejection of boron by NF/RO membranes , 2011 .

[18]  T. Arnot,et al.  A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalinationDevelopment to date and future poten , 2011 .

[19]  A. Yaroshchuk,et al.  Nanofiltration as pretreatment for scale prevention in seawater reverse osmosis desalination , 2011 .

[20]  S. Kentish,et al.  A comparison of commercial reverse osmosis membrane characteristics and performance under alginate fouling conditions , 2012 .

[21]  Abdullah A. Al-Hajouri,et al.  Long term experience in the operation of nanofiltration pretreatment unit for seawater desalination at SWCC SWRO plant , 2013 .

[22]  G. Ribera,et al.  Selection of nanofiltration membranes as pretreatment for scaling prevention in SWRO using real seawater , 2013 .