The evolution of cluster network structure and firm growth: a study of industrial software clusters

Since the cluster began to receive attention as a critical environmental factor in geographical economics, it has provided a major research methodology across multiple disciplines from industrial organization, strategic management, regional innovation system, and Triple Helix to virtual clusters. Network structure analysis (NSA) offers a common framework to observe clusters that have been studied separately from the viewpoint of industrial organization and strategic management. Industrial structure analysis, is based on the externality of a network and the resource-based view, focused on the inherent network capacity, have been combined with the study of structural changes through cluster NSA, to create a new direction for the growth of industry and individual firms. This study aims to analyze the correlation between the networking of structural change and a firm’s performance by selecting a software industrial cluster as a representative case for the knowledge industry. We examine the network structural positions of each node during the cluster evolution process. This empirical study has significance for establishing a firm’s growth strategy as well as supporting the policy about clusters, through outlining the dynamic evolution process of the networking activities in a knowledge industry cluster.

[1]  Robert Huggins,et al.  The success and failure of policy-implanted inter-firm network initiatives: motivations, processes and structure , 2000 .

[2]  Christoph Zott,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND THE EMERGENCE OF INTRAINDUSTRY DIFFERENTIAL FIRM PERFORMANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A SIMULATION STUDY , 2003 .

[3]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[4]  R. Burt.  Models of Network Structure , 1980 .

[5]  Sam Ock Park,et al.  Structural and spatial characteristics of personal actor networks: The case of industries for the elderly in Korea , 2012 .

[6]  Devanathan Sudharshan,et al.  DiffuNET: The impact of network structure on diffusion of innovation , 2005 .

[7]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[8]  A. Giddens.  New rules of sociological method : a positive critique of interpretative sociologies , 1980 .

[9]  M. Porter.  Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Companies, Governments and Institutions , 1998 .

[10]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[11]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[12]  Anne L. J. Ter Wal,et al.  Cluster emergence and network evolution A longitudinal analysis of the inventor network in Sophia-Antipolis , 2013 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[14]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[15]  José-Carlos Jarillo Mossi.  Entrepreneurship and growth : the strategic use of external resources , 1986 .

[16]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  Joel Podolny.  Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Roberta Capello,et al.  Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux: Learning Versus Collective Learning Processes , 1999 .

[19]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[20]  Elizabeth Chell,et al.  Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour , 2000 .

[21]  Geoffrey G. Bell,et al.  Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance , 2005 .

[22]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[23]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[24]  John E. Prescott,et al.  Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance , 2008 .

[25]  R. Burt.  Secondhand Brokerage: Evidence On The Importance Of Local Structure For Managers, Bankers, And Analysts , 2007 .

[26]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[27]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[28]  R. Cross,et al.  The people who make organizations go--or stop. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[29]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[30]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view , 2002 .

[31]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  A comparison of the Daegu and Edinburgh musical industries: a triple helix approach , 2011, Scientometrics.

[32]  Michaela Trippl,et al.  The Vienna software cluster: Local buzz without global pipelines? , 2007 .

[33]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[34]  Timo Pihkala,et al.  Virtual organization and the SMEs: a review and model development , 1999 .

[35]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage , 2001 .

[36]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  G. Secundo,et al.  From geographical innovation clusters towards virtual innovation clusters: The innovation virtual system , 2002 .

[38]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[39]  David Bodoff,et al.  Triple helix in the agricultural sector of Northeast Asian countries: a comparative study between Korea and China , 2011, Scientometrics.

[40]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[41]  E. Giuliani.  The Selective Nature of Knowledge Networks in Clusters: Evidence from the Wine Industry , 2007 .

[42]  J. ter Wal,et al.  Cluster emergence and network evolution A longitudinal analysis of the inventor network in Sophia-Antipolis , 2008 .

[43]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications , 2001 .

[45]  Vincenzo Farina.  Network Embeddedness, Specialization Choices and Performance in Investment Banking Industry , 2008 .

[46]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[47]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  Constellations of Firms and New Ventures , 1988 .

[48]  M. Webber.  Culture, territoriality, and the elastic mile , 1964 .

[49]  Charles H. Davis,et al.  Indicators to support innovation cluster policy , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[50]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[51]  A. Giddens,et al.  New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. , 1977 .

[52]  M. Dowling,et al.  Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms , 2003 .

[53]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Editorial: Triple Helix and innovation in Asia using scientometrics, webometrics, and informetrics , 2011, Scientometrics.