Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool

Objectives Locally advanced breast cancer (labc) poses a difficult clinical challenge with an overall poor long-term prognosis. The strength of the association between tumour characteristics, treatment response, and outcome is not well defined. In the present study, we attempted to gain further insight into labc by reviewing tumour characteristics of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and by studying the association of those characteristics with outcome. We calculated the residual cancer burden (rcb) score obtained at surgery and attempted to study its correlation with event-free survival (efs) and overall survival (os). Methods We studied patients diagnosed primarily with labc (n = 45). Pathologic and clinical responses were determined. Pathology slides were reviewed. Results Of the 45 study patients, 9% had stage iib disease; 29%, stage iiia; 51%, stage iiib; and 11%, stage iiic. Inflammatory breast cancer (ibc) was found in 16%. Pathologic complete response (pcr) was achieved in 22% of all patients. None of the patients with ibc achieved pcr. Patients with estrogen receptor–negative (er−)/progesterone receptor–negative (pr−) tumours were more likely to achieve pcr than were those with er+/pr+ tumours. Among patients with tumours that overexpressed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2/neu), 17% achieved pcr as compared with 25% of patients with non-overexpressing tumours; only 1 patient had received trastuzumab. The rcb scores were calculated in 32 patients and ranged between 0 and 4.6. Conclusions The present study examined practical issues related to the classification and management of labc and ibc. The rcb, defined from routine pathology materials, was easily quantifiable. It appears to be a better predictor than pcr of outcome following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in labc. Higher rcb scores were associated with lower efs and a lower rate of os. A continual quest for reliable predictive and correlative prognostic markers, and for better surrogate endpoints for outcome, is essential to advance our understanding of labc and to improve treatment outcomes.

[1]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  C. Caldas,et al.  Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  R. Rubens,et al.  Oestrogen receptors, clinical features and prognosis in stage III breast cancer. , 1982, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[4]  L. Arrighi,et al.  [Treatment of breast cancer]. , 1971, Prensa medica argentina.

[5]  J. Bergh,et al.  A phase II study of epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[6]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Norman Wolmark,et al.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  R. Thomas,et al.  Weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support vs triweekly epirubicin and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: final analysis of a sicog phase III study , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  C. Redmond,et al.  Relative worth of estrogen or progesterone receptor and pathologic characteristics of differentiation as indicators of prognosis in node negative breast cancer patients: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-06. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Management of stage III primary breast cancer with primary chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy , 1988, Cancer.

[12]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Long-term follow-up for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer patients treated with multimodality therapy. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  C. Perou,et al.  The Triple Negative Paradox: Primary Tumor Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  A. Musolino,et al.  Evaluation of HER-2/Neu Amplification and Other Biological Markers as Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer: The Role of Anthracycline Dose Intensity , 2006, American journal of clinical oncology.

[16]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Pathologic Predictors of Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma , 1995 .

[19]  J. Gerdes,et al.  The cell proliferation-associated antigen of antibody Ki-67: a very large, ubiquitous nuclear protein with numerous repeated elements, representing a new kind of cell cycle-maintaining proteins , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  B. Asselain,et al.  Breast tumour response to primary chemotherapy predicts local and distant control as well as survival. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[21]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Incidence and prognostic significance of complete axillary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.