The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area

Abstract The phenomenon of eParticipation is receiving increasing attention, demonstrated by recent technology implementations, experiments, government reports, and research programs. Understanding such an emerging field is a complex endeavor because there is no generally agreed upon definition of the field, no clear overview of the research disciplines or methods it draws upon, and because the boundaries of the field are undecided. Using conventional literature review techniques, we identify 131 scientific articles considered important for the field's theoretical development. This sample provides the starting point for a grounded analysis leading to the development of an overview model: the field of eParticipation seen from a researcher's perspective. The model provides structure for understanding the emerging shape of the field as well as an initial indication of its content. It also provides the basis for developing research agendas for the future.

[1]  S. Albrecht Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet , 2006 .

[2]  Jose A. Pino Information Access for a Deep Democracy , 1998 .

[3]  Carlo Hagemann,et al.  Participation in and Contents of Two Dutch Political Party Discussion Lists on the Internet , 2002 .

[4]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[6]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  Toward a Theory of the Public for Public Administration , 1991 .

[7]  Julian Padget,et al.  E-Government and E-Democracy in Latin America , 2005, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[8]  Johannes A.G.M. Models of Democracy and Concepts of Communication. , 2000 .

[9]  B. Latour We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[10]  Mike Nicholls,et al.  On the internet , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[11]  H. George Frederickson The Repositioning of American Public Administration , 1999 .

[12]  Oliver Märker,et al.  "Public Budget Dialogue" - An Innovative Approach to E-Participation , 2005, TCGOV.

[13]  B. Sweetman Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy , 1997 .

[14]  D. Silverman Qualitative research : theory, method and practice , 2004 .

[15]  Steffen Albrecht,et al.  How to Grow? Online Consultation about Growth in the City of Hamburg: Methods, Techniques, Success Factors , 2003, EGOV.

[16]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[17]  A. Weinberg Technology and democracy , 1990 .

[18]  P. Norris Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[19]  Peter J. Rimmer,et al.  The Japanese Internet: Visionaries and Virtual Democracy , 1999 .

[20]  Kheir M. Al-Kodmany Public Participation: Technology and Democracy , 2000 .

[21]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[22]  Josep Lluís Ferrer-Gomila,et al.  A Voting System with Trusted Verifiable Services , 2004, ICCSA.

[23]  Donald J. Pierce,et al.  Democracy in America , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[24]  S. Schneider Creating a Democratic Public Sphere Through Political Discussion , 1996 .

[25]  Samuel J. Best,et al.  Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation , 2005 .

[26]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  Evaluation of an e-Democracy Platform for European Cities , 2003, EGOV.

[27]  A. Whyte,et al.  Electronic Democracy and Young People , 2003 .

[28]  Sarah Elwood GIS AND COLLABORATIVE URBAN GOVERNANCE: UNDERSTANDING THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY ACTION AND POWER , 2001 .

[29]  Chang Woo-young Online civic participation, and political empowerment: online media and public opinion formation in Korea , 2005 .

[30]  Antje Gimmler Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet , 2001 .

[31]  M. Deakin,et al.  Citizens' expectations of information cities: implications for urban planning and design , 2005 .

[32]  Jakob Linaa Jensen,et al.  Virtual democratic dialogue? Bringing together citizens and politicians , 2003, Inf. Polity.

[33]  Åke Grönlund Introduction to the special issue on e-democracy in practice: methods, infrastructures and discourse , 2002 .

[34]  Stuart W. Shulman,et al.  Electronic rulemaking: a public participation research agenda for the social sciences , 2003 .

[35]  Robert D Carlitz,et al.  Online rulemaking: a step toward E-governance , 2002, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Tero Päivärinta,et al.  Autopoietic Cybergenres for e-Democracy? Genre Analysis of a Web-Based Discussion Board , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[37]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[38]  Richard Kingston,et al.  Democratic input into the nuclear waste disposal problem: The influence of geographical data on decision making examined through a Web-based GIS , 2004, J. Geogr. Syst..

[39]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  Virtual policy communities and responsive governance: Redesigning on-line debates , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[40]  A. Kakabadse,et al.  Reinventing the Democratic Governance Project through Information Technology? A Growing Agenda for Debate , 2003 .

[41]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  The electronic procurement of ideas , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[42]  C. Hardy,et al.  Online Consultation , 2005 .

[43]  J. Ellul Technology and Democracy , 1992 .

[44]  Athanassios Kosmopoulos,et al.  Aspects of Regulatory and Legal Implications on e-Voting , 2004, ER.

[45]  Tom Gross,et al.  Technological support for e-democracy: history and perspectives , 2000, Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[46]  Steven Clift An Internet of democracy. , 2000 .

[47]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  A strategic perspective of electronic democracy , 2001, CACM.

[48]  Alexander Prosser,et al.  E-Democracy: Eine neue Qualität im demokratischen Entscheidungsprozess , 2002, Wirtsch..

[49]  J. Knote Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[50]  Andrew M. Koch,et al.  Cyber Citizen or Cyborg Citizen: Baudrillard, Political Agency, and the Commons in Virtual Politics , 2005 .

[51]  B. Berelson Content analysis in communications research , 1952 .

[52]  Daniel A. Bell,et al.  The Winding Passage : Essays and Sociological Journeys, 1960-1980 , 1981 .

[53]  Karl Löfgren,et al.  The state we are in: E-democracy in Denmark , 2003, Inf. Polity.

[54]  A. Chadwick Bringing E-Democracy Back In , 2003 .

[55]  赫尓徳,et al.  民主的模式 = Models of democracy , 1986 .

[56]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  Citizen Participation in Public Affairs , 2002 .

[57]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data , 1993 .

[58]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice , 2001 .

[59]  Jennifer A. Peeples,et al.  From public sphere to public screen: democracy, activism, and the "violence" of Seattle , 2002 .

[60]  David Taniar,et al.  Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2005, International Conference, Singapore, May 9-12, 2005, Proceedings, Part I , 2005, ICCSA.

[61]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[62]  M. Ogden Politics in a parallel universe , 1994 .

[63]  J. Jensen Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government‐Sponsored – A Comparison , 2003 .

[64]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users , 2004 .

[65]  D. Newman,et al.  E-consultation: evaluating appropriate technologies and processes for citizens’ participation in public policy , 2006 .

[66]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Politicians and Interactive Decision Making: Institutional Spoilsports or Playmakers , 2000 .

[67]  Hans K. Klein,et al.  Tocqueville in Cyberspace: Using the Internet for Citizen Associations , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[68]  Lars Torpe,et al.  The State We Are In , 2020, Administrative Competence.

[69]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Democracy Squared: Designing On-Line Political Communities to Accommodate Conflicting Interests , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Jo Ann Oravec Preventing E-Voting Hazards : The Role of Information Professionals , 2005 .

[71]  Mohan J. Dutta-Bergman Access to the internet in the context of community participation and community satisfaction , 2005, New Media Soc..

[72]  Or N. Rose Madonna's Challenge: Understanding Kabbalah Today , 2004 .

[73]  Stephen Ward,et al.  Digital Rank-And-File: Party Activists' Perceptions and Use of the Internet , 2004 .

[74]  Edgar Huang Flying freely but in the cage - an empirical study of using Internet for the democratic development in China , 1999 .

[75]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  The spirit of public administration , 1996 .

[76]  Alexander Prosser,et al.  Deploying Electronic Democracy for Public Corporations , 2003, EGOV.

[77]  P. Gustafsson The Order of E-Democracy: Internet and Democracy in Swedish Local Governments , 2002 .

[78]  Kaarle Nordenstreng,et al.  Ferment in the Field: Notes on the Evolution of Communication Studies and its Disciplinary Nature , 2004 .

[79]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Framing virtual interactivity between government and citizens: a study of feedback systems in the Chicago Police Department , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[80]  K. Kenski To I-Vote or Not to I-Vote? , 2005 .

[81]  Alan D. Smith,et al.  Revolutionising the voting process through online strategies , 2005, Online Inf. Rev..

[82]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  Trust Analysis of the U.K. e-Voting Pilots , 2005 .

[83]  Lincoln Dahlberg The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[84]  Liza Tsaliki Online Forums and the Enlargement of Public Space: Research Findings from a European Project , 2002 .

[85]  Brian Trench,et al.  The Internet and Democratic Participation: Uses of ICTs by Voluntary and Community Organisations in Ireland , 1997 .

[86]  Eleanor Burt,et al.  Voluntary organisations as e-democratic actors: political identity, legitimacy and accountability and the need for new research , 2005 .

[87]  Hyun Soon Park,et al.  Case Study: Public Consensus Building on the Internet , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[88]  P. Howard Deep Democracy, Thin Citizenship: The Impact of Digital Media in Political Campaign Strategy , 2005 .

[89]  Angus Whyte,et al.  Transparency and teledemocracy: issues from an ‘e-consultation’ , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[90]  Eli M. Noam,et al.  Why the Internet is bad for democracy , 2005, CACM.

[91]  Jo Steyaert,et al.  Local Governments Online and the Role of the Resident , 2000 .

[92]  R. Gibson,et al.  Elections Online: Assessing Internet Voting in Light of the Arizona Democratic Primary , 2001 .

[93]  R. Polat The Internet and Political Participation , 2005 .

[94]  Hilmar Westholm,et al.  e-Democracy Goes Ahead. The Internet As a Tool for Improving Deliberative Policies? , 2002, EGOV.

[95]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[96]  Carl J. Cuneo,et al.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2003 .

[97]  G. Aikens A personal history of minnesota electronic democracy, 1994 , 1998 .

[98]  Ignace Snellen,et al.  ICTs, bureaucracies, and the future of democracy , 2001, CACM.

[99]  David Hardisty,et al.  On the Internet , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[100]  A. Whyte,et al.  Representational Politics in Virtual Urban Places , 2003 .

[101]  A. Hudson-Smith,et al.  Building the virtual city: Public participation through e-democracy , 2005 .

[102]  E. Siapera Minority Activism on the Web: Between Deliberative Democracy and Multiculturalism , 2005 .

[103]  J. Moreno‐Jiménez,et al.  E-Cognocracy and the Participation of Immigrants in E-Governance , 2005 .

[104]  Jörgen Svensson,et al.  E-voting in Europe: Divergent democratic practice , 2003, Inf. Polity.

[105]  L. Bingham,et al.  The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government , 2005 .

[106]  Å. Grönlund Emerging Electronic Infrastructures , 2003 .

[107]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Internet and teledemocracy in participatory planning of natural resources management , 2003 .

[108]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  E-democracy and knowledge: A multicriteria framework for the new democratic era , 2003 .

[109]  Bruce Bimber Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level , 2001 .

[110]  K. Hacker The Potential of Computer-Mediated Communication (Cmc) for Political Structuration , 2004 .

[111]  Steven Clift Viewpoint: an Internet of democracy , 2000, CACM.

[112]  A. Gronlund Introduction to the Special Issue on E-democracy in Practice: Methods, Infrastructures and Discourse , 2003 .

[113]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[114]  A. M. Fernández-Maldonado,et al.  Virtual cities as a tool for democratization in developing countries , 2005 .

[115]  Eugenia Siapera,et al.  Asylum Politics, The Internet, And The Public Sphere: The Case of UK Refugee Support Groups Online , 2004 .

[116]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It , 2000 .

[117]  Anne-Marie Oostveen,et al.  Internet Voting Technologies and Civic Participation: The Users’ Perspective , 2004 .

[118]  João Paulo Costa,et al.  Discursive e-Democracy Support , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[119]  P. Jaeger,et al.  Social Information Behavior and the Democratic Process: Information Poverty, Normative Behavior, and Electronic Government in the United States , 2004 .