Can Gamification Improve the Benefits of Student Response Systems in Learning? An Experimental Study

Student response systems (SRSs) are becoming popular among instructors in nearly all levels of learning. The benefits of using SRSs in terms of attendance, attention, participation, or motivation have been shown in many studies. Moreover, several studies demonstrate that the use of some kind of gaming techniques in education are useful to stimulate students to learn in wider, longer, and deeper ways. This paper analyzes whether the integration of both SRSs and gaming techniques leads to better results in motivation, attention, engagement, and learning performance than SRSs alone. For this purpose, a new tool has been developed for conducting an experimental study with students from different subjects and from different academic levels. A randomized post-test-only control group analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of the gamified SRS. In addition, a multivariate three-way factorial design has been performed considering three relevant factors: 1) learning tool (non-gamified SRS or gamified SRS); 2) study type; and 3) gender. The main finding is that students who took lecture sessions with a gamified SRS had more positive perceptions with respect to motivation, attention, and learning performance than students who took lecture sessions with a non-gamified SRS.

[1]  G. Stewart,et al.  Enhancing the Student‐Instructor Interaction Frequency , 2002 .

[2]  Jeremy Paul. Fuller.  Clickers in the classroom : can the use of electronic response systems improve student learning? , 2011 .

[3]  Darlene M. Guse,et al.  Validation of the audience response system , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Rush Cosgrove,et al.  Critical thinking in the Oxford tutorial: a call for an explicit and systematic approach , 2011 .

[5]  Diane M. Bunce,et al.  How Long Can Students Pay Attention in Class? A Study of Student Attention Decline Using Clickers , 2010 .

[6]  Nirusha Lachman,et al.  Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[7]  John Brown,et al.  Gamification » Blog Archive » Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? , 2014 .

[8]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[10]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[11]  Jennifer Jenson,et al.  Gender, Simulation, and Gaming: Research Review and Redirections , 2010 .

[12]  Lorena Blasco-Arcas,et al.  Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Jones Matt,et al.  Audience Response Systems in Higher Education , 1970 .

[14]  Hyungshim Jang.  Supporting Students' Motivation, Engagement, and Learning During an Uninteresting Activity , 2008 .

[15]  Matthew J Bassignani,et al.  Effect of an audience response system on resident learning and retention of lecture material. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Lei Bao,et al.  Single-Concept Clicker Question Sequences , 2011 .

[17]  Michael E. Lantz,et al.  The use of 'Clickers' in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Lina Yordanova,et al.  Gamification in education , 2014 .

[19]  Brian H. McArdle,et al.  FITTING MULTIVARIATE MODELS TO COMMUNITY DATA: A COMMENT ON DISTANCE‐BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[20]  D. Ostergaard,et al.  Good experiences with an audience response system used in medical education. , 2011, Danish medical bulletin.

[21]  Craig Miller,et al.  The Gamification Of Education , 2013 .

[22]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  QUESTION DRIVEN INSTRUCTION: TEACHING SCIENCE (WELL) WITH AN AUDIENCE RESPONSE SYSTEM , 2005 .

[23]  Edward F. Gehringer,et al.  Accountability and the use of classroom response devices , 2011, 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[24]  J. Banfield,et al.  Increasing Student Intrinsic Motivation And Self-Efficacy Through Gamification Pedagogy , 2014 .

[25]  Tolga Gok,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF STUDENT RESPONSE SYSTEMS FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF INSTRUCTORS AND STUDENTS , 2011 .

[26]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  Gamification : Toward a Definition , 2022 .

[27]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[28]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS) , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[30]  Hasan Çakir,et al.  Research in online learning environments: Priorities and methodologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Pete Boghossian.  How Socratic Pedagogy Works , 2003 .

[32]  D. Doherty,et al.  The audience response system and knowledge gain: A prospective study , 2012, Medical teacher.

[33]  Christopher Cunningham,et al.  Gamification by Design - Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps , 2011 .

[34]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature , 2009, Comput. Educ..