FingerMap: a new approach to predict soft material 3D objects printability

Soft material 3D printing through liquid deposition modelling (LDM) is a challenging manufacturing process where yield stress control is mandatory. Indeed, the higher the yield stress value, the more complex the 3D printed structure can be. In a bid to go one step further, this report proposes a new approach enabling the prediction of soft material 3D printability as a function of the material’s properties and shape. The prediction consists in numerical simulation to anticipate, in silico, the collapse of a voxelised 3D design, called FingerMap. To do so, a calibration of the program using three silicone formulations (with increasing yield stress value) was first performed to define a printability domain according to mass/surface ratio, overhang angle and the z-position of each voxel. Then, two anatomical 3D models (ear and aortic valve) were used to demonstrate the capacity of the tool to predict printability. Good correlations between theoretical and experimental results were obtained. The proposed in silico simulation tool was then proven to be useful for LDM, even if some limitations were identified, particularly in the case of materials exhibiting complex rheological behaviours such as time-dependent rheological properties.

[1]  Adrien Bousseau,et al.  CrossShade: shading concept sketches using cross-section curves , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[2]  LipsonHod,et al.  Dynamic Simulation of Soft Multimaterial 3D-Printed Objects , 2014 .

[3]  R. Thompson,et al.  The yield stress tensor , 2018, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  G. Tovar,et al.  Impact of intermediate UV curing and yield stress of 3D printed poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels on interlayer connectivity and maximum build height , 2017 .

[5]  C. Marquette,et al.  Silicone rheological behavior modification for 3D printing: Evaluation of yield stress impact on printed object properties , 2019, Additive Manufacturing.

[6]  Andrew J E Duncan,et al.  Advanced Polymer Designs for Direct-Ink-Write 3D Printing. , 2019, Chemistry.

[7]  Karolina Golec,et al.  Hybrid 3D Mass Spring System for Soft Tissue Simulation. (Système Masse-Ressort 3D hybride amélioré pour la simulation de tissus mous) , 2018 .

[8]  Dishit P. Parekh,et al.  3D Printing by Multiphase Silicone/Water Capillary Inks , 2017, Advanced materials.

[9]  M. Habibi,et al.  The yield normal stress , 2018, Journal of Rheology.

[10]  Radomír Mech,et al.  Stress relief , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[11]  J. Paquien Etude des propriétés rhéologiques et de l'état de dispersion de suspensions PDMS/Silice , 2003 .

[12]  J-N. Paquien,et al.  Rheological studies of fumed silica–polydimethylsiloxane suspensions , 2005 .

[13]  J. Kadkhodapour,et al.  Investigating internal architecture effect in plastic deformation and failure for TPMS-based scaffolds using simulation methods and experimental procedure. , 2014, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[14]  Sabino Ayvar-Soberanis,et al.  Design against distortion for additive manufacturing , 2018, Additive Manufacturing.

[15]  Samuel Rosset,et al.  Inkjet 3D printing of UV and thermal cure silicone elastomers for dielectric elastomer actuators , 2017 .

[16]  M. Walsh,et al.  Engineering silicone rubbers for in vitro studies: creating AAA models and ILT analogues with physiological properties. , 2010, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  Albert J. Shih,et al.  The extrusion-based additive manufacturing of moisture-cured silicone elastomer with minimal void for pneumatic actuators , 2017 .

[18]  Denis Zorin,et al.  Worst-case structural analysis , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[19]  Tarasankar DebRoy,et al.  An improved prediction of residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing , 2017 .

[20]  E. Toyserkani,et al.  Additive manufacturing of silicone structures: A review and prospective , 2018, Additive Manufacturing.

[21]  J. Malda,et al.  Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting , 2016, Biofabrication.

[22]  Thomas J. Hinton,et al.  3D Printing PDMS Elastomer in a Hydrophilic Support Bath via Freeform Reversible Embedding , 2016, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[23]  Frédéric Demoly,et al.  Design for 4D printing: A voxel-based modeling and simulation of smart materials , 2019, Materials & Design.

[24]  Winslow H. Herschel,et al.  Konsistenzmessungen von Gummi-Benzollösungen , 1926 .