Project-Oriented Design-Based Learning: Aligning Students' Views With Industry Needs*

This paper focuses on the alignment of students' views on project-oriented design-based learning (PODBL) with today's industrial needs. A Collaborative relationship between academic institutions and industrial expectations is a significant process towards analytical thinking (linking the theory and practice). Improving students' knowledge as well as the students' transition into industry, requires efficient joint ventures by both learning institutions and industry partners. Project-based learning (PBL) is well developed and implemented in most engineering schools and departments around the world. What requires closer attention is the focus on design within this project-based learning framework. Today design projects have been used to motivate and teach science in elementary, middle, and high school classrooms. They are also used to assist students with possible science and engineering careers. For these reasons, design-based learning (DBL) is intended to be an effective approach to learning that is centered on a design problem-solving structure adopted for a problem-oriented project-based education. Based on an industry design forum, which the authors conducted in Melbourne, Australia in 2012, a research study was performed to investigate the industry and academic requirements for students focusing on achieving design skills. To transform the present situation in the academic teaching and learning environment and to fulfill industry needs, this research study also investigated the students' views on design skills.

[1]  Matthew Joordens,et al.  Learning through projects in engineering education , 2012 .

[2]  Meredith Davis.  Making a Case for Design-Based Learning , 1998 .

[3]  Daniella Tilbury,et al.  Teaching and Learning Geography , 1997 .

[4]  Roger Hadgraft,et al.  Designing the Future , 2009 .

[5]  Martin Lehmann,et al.  Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education , 2008 .

[6]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Identifying students’ perceptions of the important classroom features affecting learning aspects of a design-based learning environment , 2008 .

[7]  Jean Michel,et al.  Management of Change-Implementation of Problem-based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering , 2009 .

[8]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[9]  Ian de Vere.  Developing creative engineers: a design approach to engineering education , 2009 .

[10]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  REFLECTIONS ON PROJECT WORK AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING , 1996 .

[11]  Yaron Doppelt,et al.  Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning , 2009 .

[12]  John A. Webster.  Engineering education in Australia , 2000 .

[13]  Yaron Doppelt,et al.  Implementation and Assessment of Project-Based Learning in a Flexible Environment , 2003 .

[14]  C. Schunn,et al.  Engagement and Achievements: A Case Study of Design-Based Learning in a Science Context. , 2008 .

[15]  Matthew Joordens,et al.  The process of design based learning: A students' perspective , 2012 .

[16]  C B Royeen,et al.  Student perspectives on problem-based learning in an occupational therapy curriculum: a multiyear qualitative evaluation. , 1999, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  Kent M. Black,et al.  An Industry View of Engineering Education , 1994 .

[18]  Christian D Schunn,et al.  Design‐based learning for biology , 2008, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[19]  Stephanie Bell.  Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future , 2010 .

[20]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[21]  Hamid Hadim,et al.  Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.