A new polarimetric classification approach evaluated for agricultural crops

Statistical properties of the polarimetric backscatter behavior for a single homogeneous area with constant radar reflectivity are described by the Wishart distribution or its marginal distributions. These distributions do not necessarily well describe the statistics for a collection of homogeneous areas of the same class because of variation in, for example, biophysical parameters. Using Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) tests of fit, it is shown that, for example, the Beta distribution is a better descriptor for the polarimetric correlation, and the log-normal distribution for the backscatter level. An evaluation is given for a number of agricultural crop classes, grasslands, and fruit tree plantations at the Flevoland test site, using an AirSAR (C-, L- and P-band polarimetric) image from July 3, 1991. A new reversible transform of the covariance matrix into backscatter intensities will be introduced in order to describe the full polarimetric target properties in a mathematically alternative way, allowing for the development of simple, versatile, and robust classifiers. Moreover, it allows for polarimetric image segmentation using conventional approaches. The effect of azimuthally asymmetric backscatter behavior on the classification results is discussed. Several models are proposed, and results are compared with results from the literature for the same test site. It can be concluded that the introduced classifiers perform very well, with levels of accuracy for this test site, with 14 cover types, of 90.4% for C-band, 88.7% for L-band, and 96.3% for the combination of C- and L-band.

[1]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  Land cover type and biomass classification using AirSAR data for evaluation of monitoring scenarios in the Colombian Amazon , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Paolo Ferrazzoli,et al.  Experimental and model investigation on radar classification capability , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  M. Seymour,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation for SAR interferometry , 1994, Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[4]  B. Bouman,et al.  Multi-temporal, multi-frequency radar measurements of agricultural crops during the Agriscatt-88 campaign in The Netherlands. , 1993 .

[5]  Kun-Shan Chen,et al.  Classification of multifrequency polarimetric SAR imagery using a dynamic learning neural network , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Seisuke Fukuda,et al.  A wavelet-based texture feature set applied to classification of multifrequency polarimetric SAR images , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Dirk H. Hoekman Speckle ensemble statistics of logarithmically scaled data [radar] , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Stephen D. DeGloria,et al.  Interpretation of Landsat-4 Thematic Mapper and Multispectral Scanner data for forest surveys , 1985 .

[9]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[10]  Eric Pottier,et al.  Quantitative comparison of classification capability: fully polarimetric versus dual and single-polarization SAR , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  D. H. Hoekman,et al.  Interpretation of C- and X-band radar images over an agricultural area, the Flevoland test site in the Agriscatt-87 campaign. , 1993 .

[12]  J. J. van der Sanden,et al.  Groundtruth collection for the JPL-SAR and ERS-1 Campaign in Flevoland and the Veluwe (NL) 1991. , 1992 .

[13]  S. Quegan,et al.  A statistical description of polarimetric and interferometric synthetic aperture radar data , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[14]  Fuk K. Li,et al.  Symmetry properties in polarimetric remote sensing , 1992 .