Two Randomized Mechanisms for Combinatorial Auctions

This paper discusses two advancements in the theory of designing truthful randomized mechanisms. Our first contribution is a new framework for developing truthful randomized mechanisms. The framework enables the construction of mechanisms with polynomially small failure probability. This is in contrast to previous mechanisms that fail with constant probability. Another appealing feature of the new framework is that bidding truthfully is a stronglydominant strategy. The power of the framework is demonstrated by an $O(\sqrt m)$-mechanism for combinatorial auctions that succeeds with probability $1-O(\frac {\log m} {\sqrt m})$. The other major result of this paper is an O(logmloglogm) randomized truthful mechanism for combinatorial auction with subadditivebidders. The best previously-known truthful mechanism for this setting guaranteed an approximation ratio of $O(\sqrt m)$. En route, the new mechanism also provides the best approximation ratio for combinatorial auctions with submodularbidders currently achieved by truthful mechanisms.

[1]  Robin Milner,et al.  On Observing Nondeterminism and Concurrency , 1980, ICALP.

[2]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Algorithmic mechanism design (extended abstract) , 1999, STOC '99.

[3]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Computationally feasible vcg-based mechanisms , 2000 .

[4]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms , 2000, EC '00.

[5]  Daniel Lehmann,et al.  Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities , 2001, EC '01.

[6]  N. Nisan The Communication Complexity of Approximate Set Packing and Covering , 2002, ICALP.

[7]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[8]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Bundling equilibrium in combinatorial auctions , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[9]  N. Nisan,et al.  On the Computational Power of Iterative Auctions I: Demand Queries , 2005 .

[10]  Chaitanya Swamy,et al.  Truthful and near-optimal mechanism design via linear programming , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[11]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Approximation algorithms for combinatorial auctions with complement-free bidders , 2005, STOC '05.

[12]  Aranyak Mehta,et al.  Inapproximability Results for Combinatorial Auctions with Submodular Utility Functions , 2005, Algorithmica.

[13]  Uriel Feige,et al.  Approximation algorithms for allocation problems: Improving the factor of 1 - 1/e , 2006, 2006 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'06).

[14]  Uriel Feige,et al.  On maximizing welfare when utility functions are subadditive , 2006, STOC '06.

[15]  Noam Nisan,et al.  The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supporting prices , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[16]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Truthful randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions , 2006, STOC '06.

[17]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic game theory , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[18]  N. Nisan Introduction to Mechanism Design (for Computer Scientists) , 2007 .

[19]  Fan Chung Graham,et al.  Internet and Network Economics, Third International Workshop, WINE 2007, San Diego, CA, USA, December 12-14, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, WINE.

[20]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Limitations of VCG-based mechanisms , 2007, STOC '07.

[21]  Ron Lavi,et al.  Algorithmic Mechanism Design , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.