Aligning Misaligned Systemic Innovations: Probing Inter-Firm Effects Development in Project Networks

Implementing systemic innovations in a project network can significantly improve its performance; however, implementing systemic innovations is difficult if project network structures misalign to the innovation. Little research has examined how project network structures can align to systemic innovations. To address this research gap, we studied an advanced building information modeling tool implemented in a Finnish design and development project network. We found that misaligned innovations are aligned through a process of task sequence alignment, knowledge base alignment, and work allocation alignment. Our findings are important; they suggest that implementing systemic innovations in project networks is a multistage inter-firm process.

[1]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Role change of design engineers in product development , 2005 .

[2]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Perspectives on an Integrated Construction Project Model , 2000, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[3]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[4]  C. J. Anumba,et al.  Information and communications technologies to facilitate concurrent engineering in construction , 1997 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[6]  S. Newell,et al.  Interdependencies in Complex Project Ecologies: The Case of Biomedical Innovation , 2008 .

[7]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[8]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Areas of Application for 3D and 4D Models on Construction Projects , 2008 .

[9]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[10]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Carrie Sturts Dossick,et al.  Organizational Divisions in BIM-Enabled Commercial Construction , 2010 .

[12]  Jukka Alvesalo,et al.  Global business process development in a virtual community of practice , 2003 .

[13]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Paradigm Trajectories of Building Information Modeling Practice in Project Networks , 2009 .

[14]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[15]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Minding the Gaps: Understanding Technology Interdependence and Coordination in Knowledge Work , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[16]  J. Sydow,et al.  Project Networks and Changing Industry Practices Collaborative Content Production in the German Television Industry , 2001 .

[17]  S. Fox,et al.  Interorganizational use of building information models: potential for automational, informational and transformational effects , 2007 .

[18]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[19]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[20]  J. Taylor Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries , 2004 .

[21]  P. Leonardi,et al.  What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing , 2010 .

[22]  Ashwin Mahalingam,et al.  Institutional Theory as a Framework for Analyzing Conflicts on Global Projects , 2007 .

[23]  Maoshan Qiang,et al.  Cross-Cultural Understanding of Construction Project Managers’ Conceptions of Their Work , 2009 .

[24]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Agent-based modeling of knowledge dynamics , 2004 .

[25]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Project-based firms: new organizational form or variations on a theme? , 2006 .

[26]  Mahmoud R. Halfawy,et al.  Building Integrated Architecture/Engineering/Construction Systems Using Smart Objects: Methodology and Implementation , 2005 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[28]  Beth A. Bechky Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation , 2002 .

[30]  Darren Dalcher,et al.  The Dynamics of Collaboration in Multipartner Projects , 2010 .

[31]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Innovation Alignment and Project Network Dynamics: An Integrative Model for Change , 2007 .

[32]  Riitta Smeds,et al.  Knowledge Transformation in Project Networks: A Speech Act Level Cross-Boundary Analysis , 2011 .

[33]  R. Calantone,et al.  Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance , 2002 .

[34]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Transformational Technologies and the Creation of New Work Practices: Making Implicit Knowledge Explicit in Task-based Offshoring , 2008, MIS Q..

[35]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  Project-as-Practice: In Search of Project Management Research that Matters , 2010, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[36]  Chris Harty,et al.  Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach , 2005 .

[37]  S. Newell,et al.  Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments , 2003 .

[38]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Organizational Routines, Situated Learning and Processes of Change in Project-Based Organizations , 2005 .

[39]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Implementation of VR systems: a comparison between the early adoption of CAD and current uptake of VR , 2002 .

[40]  S. Manning Embedding Projects in Multiple Contexts: A Structuration Perspective , 2010 .

[41]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  A survey of CAD and virtual reality within the house building industry , 1999 .

[42]  YAN JIN,et al.  The virtual design team: A computational model of project organizations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[43]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[44]  Carrie Sturts Dossick,et al.  Subcontractor Schedule Control Method , 2007 .

[45]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change , 1998 .

[46]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  IT implementation in the construction organization , 2002 .

[47]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  Implementing information systems with project teams using ethnographic-action research , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[48]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Introduction: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation. , 1990 .

[49]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Mobilizing Institutional Knowledge for International Projects , 2010 .

[50]  Torbjörn Stjernberg,et al.  Design and implementation in major investments -- A project network approach , 1995 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[52]  A. Hargadon Organizations in Action:Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Book) , 2003 .

[53]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[54]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Antecedents of Successful Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Design Implementation in Design and Construction Networks , 2007 .

[55]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[57]  Steven J. Fenves,et al.  A foundation for interoperability in next-generation product development systems , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..