Manipulating an aggregation rule under ordinally fuzzy preferences

It is well known that many aggregation rules are manipulable through strategic behaviour. Typically, the aggregation rules considered in the literature are social choice correspondences. In this paper the aggregation rules of interest are social welfare functions (SWFs). We investigate the problem of constructing a SWF that is non-manipulable. In this context, individuals attempt to manipulate a social ordering as opposed to a social choice. Using techniques from an ordinal version of fuzzy set theory, we introduce a class of ordinally fuzzy binary relations of which exact binary relations are a special case. Operating within this family enables us to prove an impossibility theorem. This theorem states that all non-manipulable SWFs are dictatorial, provided that they are not constant. This theorem uses a weaker transitivity condition than the one in Perote-Peña and Piggins (J Math Econ 43:564–580, 2007), and the ordinal framework we employ is more general than the cardinal setting used there. We conclude by considering several ways of circumventing this impossibility theorem.

[1]  Prasanta K. Pattanaik,et al.  Fuzzy Sets, Preference and Choice: Some Conceptual Issues , 1989 .

[2]  Alan D. Taylor,et al.  Social choice and the mathematics of manipulation , 2005 .

[3]  John Broome,et al.  Is incommensurability vagueness , 1997 .

[4]  M. Dasgupta,et al.  Factoring fuzzy transitivity , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[5]  S. Ovchinnikov Social choice and Lukasiewicz logic , 1991 .

[6]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  On the manipulability of the fuzzy social choice functions , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Fang-Fang Tang,et al.  Fuzzy Preferences and Social Choice , 1994 .

[8]  Gregory S. Richardson,et al.  The structure of fuzzy preferences: Social choice implications , 1998 .

[9]  Juan Perote-Peña,et al.  Non-manipulable Social Welfare Functions when Preferences are Fuzzy , 2009, J. Log. Comput..

[10]  Wulf Gaertner,et al.  A Primer in Social Choice Theory: Revised Edition , 2009 .

[11]  Ashley Piggins,et al.  Instances of Indeterminacy , 2007 .

[12]  A. Sen,et al.  Collective Choice and Social Welfare , 2017 .

[13]  Paulo P. Côrte-Real Fuzzy voters, Crisp Votes , 2007, IGTR.

[14]  R. Deb,et al.  Transitivity and fuzzy preferences , 1996 .

[15]  J. Goguen L-fuzzy sets , 1967 .

[16]  K. Arrow Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[17]  Asis Kumar Banerjee,et al.  Fuzzy preferences and Arrow-type problems in social choice , 1994 .

[18]  Prasanta K. Pattanaik,et al.  On the stability of sincere voting situations , 1973 .

[19]  Peter C. Fishburn Comments on Hansson's 'Group Preferences' , 1970 .

[20]  Ashley Piggins,et al.  Strategy-proof fuzzy aggregation rules , 2007 .

[21]  Bruno Leclerc,et al.  Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: A theoretic Arrow-like approach , 1991 .

[22]  C. R. Barrett,et al.  Rationality and aggregation of preferences in an ordinally fuzzy framework , 1992 .

[23]  R. Deb,et al.  Soft sets: an ordinal formulation of vagueness with some applications to the theory of choice , 1992 .

[24]  W. Gaertner A Primer in Social Choice Theory , 2006 .

[25]  A. Sen,et al.  Interpersonal Aggregation and Partial Comparability , 1970 .

[26]  C. R. Barrett,et al.  On the structure of fuzzy social welfare functions , 1986 .

[27]  Antoine Billot,et al.  Economic Theory of Fuzzy Equilibria , 1992 .

[28]  Bruno Leclerc,et al.  Efficient and binary consensus functions on transitively valued relations , 1984 .

[29]  W. Bossert,et al.  Strategy-proofness of social welfare functions: The use of the Kemeny distance between preference orderings , 1992 .

[30]  Bhaskan Dutta,et al.  Fuzzy preferences and social choice , 1987 .

[31]  Nicolas Gabriel Andjiga,et al.  Fuzzy strict preference and social choice , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[32]  A. Gibbard Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result , 1973 .

[33]  Salvador Barberà,et al.  An introduction to strategy-proof social choice functions , 2001, Soc. Choice Welf..

[34]  M. Satterthwaite Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions , 1975 .