Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

Introduction A significant proportion of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harbor mutations in homologous recombination (HR) repair genes, with some of these mutations associating with increased tumor susceptibility to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy. While mutations in some HR repair genes (e.g., BRCA1/2) have been associated with a more aggressive clinical course, prior studies correlating HR mutational status with treatment response to androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) or taxane-based chemotherapy have yielded conflicting results. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to assess clinical outcomes to conventional, regulatory-approved therapies in mCRPC patients with somatic (monoallelic and biallelic) and/or germline HR repair mutations compared to patients without alterations as determined by clinical-grade next-generation sequencing assays. The primary endpoint was PSA30/PSA50 response, defined as ≥30%/≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints of PSA progression-free survival (pPFS) and clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results A total of 90 consecutively selected patients were included in this analysis, of which 33 (37%) were identified to have HR repair gene mutations. Age, race, Gleason score, prior surgery, and receipt of prior radiation therapy were comparable between carriers and non-carriers. There was no evidence that PSA30/PSA50 differed by HR gene mutational status. Median pPFS and crPFS ranged 3–14 months across treatment modalities, but there was no evidence either differed by HR gene mutational status (all p>0.05). There was also no difference in outcomes between those with BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations (n = 17) compared to those without HR repair mutations. Conclusion HR gene mutational status was associated with comparable clinical outcomes following treatment with ARSIs or taxane-based chemotherapy. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

[1]  F. Saad,et al.  Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  F. Feng,et al.  Non-BRCA DNA Damage Repair Gene Alterations and Response to the PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Analysis From the Phase II TRITON2 Study , 2020, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  N. Tunariu,et al.  Genomics of lethal prostate cancer at diagnosis and castration resistance , 2019, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  N. Tunariu,et al.  Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  M. Gleave,et al.  Optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  Differential Response to Olaparib Treatment Among Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 Versus ATM Mutations. , 2019, European urology.

[7]  P. Nelson,et al.  Genomic Characterization of Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Identifies a High Prevalence of DNA Repair Gene Mutations. , 2019, JCO precision oncology.

[8]  E. Gallardo,et al.  PROREPAIR-B: A Prospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Germline DNA Repair Mutations on the Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  A. D’Andrea Mechanisms of PARP inhibitor sensitivity and resistance. , 2018, DNA repair.

[10]  R. Simon,et al.  Loss of CHD1 causes DNA repair defects and enhances prostate cancer therapeutic responsiveness , 2018, EMBO reports.

[11]  M. Rubin,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer Patients with Germline DNA Repair Mutations: Retrospective Analysis from an International Study , 2018, European urology.

[12]  Bruce Montgomery,et al.  Targeting Androgen Receptor and DNA Repair in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results From NCI 9012. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  Prognostic and therapeutic implications of DNA repair gene mutations in advanced prostate cancer. , 2017, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[14]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  The association between germline BRCA2 variants and sensitivity to platinum‐based chemotherapy among men with metastatic prostate cancer , 2017, Cancer.

[15]  J. Eshleman,et al.  MSH2 Loss in Primary Prostate Cancer , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  M. Nykter,et al.  Treatment Outcomes and Tumor Loss of Heterozygosity in Germline DNA Repair-deficient Prostate Cancer. , 2017, European urology.

[17]  K. Tabata,et al.  Abiraterone acetate after progression with enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multi-center retrospective analysis , 2016, BMC Research Notes.

[18]  O. Olopade,et al.  Effect of BRCA germline mutations on breast cancer prognosis , 2016, Medicine.

[19]  Oliver Sartor,et al.  Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Ahmet Zehir,et al.  Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  P. Nelson,et al.  Biallelic Inactivation of BRCA2 in Platinum-sensitive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2016, European urology.

[22]  G. Shapiro,et al.  Homologous Recombination Deficiency: Exploiting the Fundamental Vulnerability of Ovarian Cancer. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[23]  Wei Yuan,et al.  DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  R. Eeles,et al.  Effect of BRCA Mutations on Metastatic Relapse and Cause-specific Survival After Radical Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[25]  M. Gleave,et al.  Cabazitaxel Remains Active in Patients Progressing After Docetaxel Followed by Novel Androgen Receptor Pathway Targeted Therapies. , 2015, European urology.

[26]  David C. Smith,et al.  Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer , 2015, Cell.

[27]  B. Schumacher,et al.  DNA repair mechanisms in cancer development and therapy , 2015, Front. Genet..

[28]  C. Scott,et al.  Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: recent advances and future development. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  H. Gelderblom,et al.  CAST: A retrospective analysis of cabazitaxel and abiraterone acetate sequential treatment in patients with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[30]  N. Agarwal,et al.  Activity of enzalutamide in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer is affected by prior treatment with abiraterone and/or docetaxel , 2014, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease.

[31]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  Chemotherapy and its evolving role in the management of advanced prostate cancer , 2014, Asian journal of andrology.

[32]  R. Eeles,et al.  Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  P. Scardino,et al.  Germline BRCA mutation does not prevent response to taxane‐based therapy for the treatment of castration‐resistant prostate cancer , 2012, BJU international.

[34]  Soumya Krishnamurthy,et al.  Cellular Responses to Cisplatin-Induced DNA Damage , 2010, Journal of nucleic acids.

[35]  Fan Zhang,et al.  PALB2 Functionally Connects the Breast Cancer Susceptibility Proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 2009, Molecular Cancer Research.

[36]  F. Couch,et al.  Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. , 2006, Molecular cell.