3D mask effects in high NA EUV imaging

Understanding, characterization and management of 3D mask effects, including non-telecentricity, contrast fading and best focus shifts, become increasingly important for the performance optimization of future extreme ultraviolet (EUV) projection systems and mask designs. Novel imaging configuration and central obscuration in high NA EUV projection systems introduce additional imaging effects. A simplified coherent imaging model, rigorous mask diffraction simulations, images for individual source areas and a hybrid mask model are employed to analyze the root causes of observed imaging artifacts. Based on this, several image enhancement strategies including modifications of mask and source are devised and investigated for lines/spaces.

[1]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Modeling high-efficiency extreme ultraviolet etched multilayer phase-shift masks , 2017 .

[2]  Harry J. Levinson,et al.  Current challenges and opportunities for EUV lithography , 2018, Photomask Technology.

[3]  Jo Finders,et al.  EUV source optimization driven by fundamental diffraction considerations , 2017, Photomask Technology.

[4]  R. Gronheid,et al.  A novel method for characterizing resist performance , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Gijsbert Rispens,et al.  Edge placement error control and Mask3D effects in High-NA anamorphic EUV lithography , 2017, Photomask Technology.

[6]  R. Gronheid,et al.  Novel method for characterizing resist performance , 2008 .

[7]  Vicky Philipsen,et al.  Reducing extreme ultraviolet mask three-dimensional effects by alternative metal absorbers , 2017 .

[8]  Peter Evanschitzky,et al.  Extended Abbe approach for fast and accurate lithography imaging simulations , 2009, European Mask and Lithography Conference.

[9]  Scott Mansfield,et al.  Subresolution assist features impact and implementation in extreme ultraviolet lithography for next-generation beyond 7-nm node , 2018, Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS.

[10]  A. Rosenbluth,et al.  Understanding high numerical aperture optical lithography , 1992 .

[11]  Peter De Bisschop,et al.  Validity of the Hopkins approximation in simulations of hyper-NA (NA>1) line-space structures for an attenuated PSM mask , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Jingjing Liu,et al.  Challenges of anamorphic high-NA lithography and mask making , 2017 .

[13]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Resolution, LER, and sensitivity limitations of photoresists , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Jan van Schoot,et al.  High-NA EUV lithography: The next step in EUV imaging (Conference Presentation) , 2018 .

[15]  Vicky Philipsen,et al.  Attenuated phase shift mask for extreme ultraviolet: can they mitigate three-dimensional mask effects? , 2018 .

[16]  Vicky Philipsen,et al.  Characterization and mitigation of 3D mask effects in extreme ultraviolet lithography , 2017 .

[17]  Martin Burkhardt,et al.  Investigation of alternate mask absorbers in EUV lithography , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Tim Fühner.  Artificial Evolution for the Optimization of Lithographic Process Conditions , 2014 .

[19]  Bernhard Kneer,et al.  Imaging performance of EUV lithography optics configuration for sub-9nm resolution , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[20]  Jo Finders,et al.  Mitigation of mask three-dimensional induced phase effects by absorber optimization in ArFi and extreme ultraviolet lithography , 2016 .

[21]  Gijsbert Rispens,et al.  High-numerical aperture extreme ultraviolet scanner for 8-nm lithography and beyond , 2017 .

[22]  Andreas Erdmann,et al.  Advanced EUV mask and imaging modeling , 2017 .

[23]  Obert Wood,et al.  Mask 3D effects and compensation for high NA EUV lithography , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[24]  Winfried Kaiser,et al.  Interactions of 3D mask effects and NA in EUV lithography , 2012, Photomask Technology.