Predicting Media Appeal From Instinctive Moral Values

Zillmann's moral sanction theory defines morality subcultures for entertainment as groups of media viewers who evaluate character actions with shared value systems. However, the theory provides no a priori means to identify these shared value systems. The model of intuitive morality and exemplars incorporates a theoretical framework for identifying and testing the factors from which these shared value systems emerge. This study applies the model's framework, based on 5 “moral domains” from moral foundations theory, to test the influence of shared value systems on character perceptions and narrative appeal. A within-subject experiment varied violation of these five domains (care, fairness, ingroup loyalty, authority, and purity) and narrative resolutions (positive or negative outcomes) in 10 short narrative scenarios. The 5 domains predicted character perceptions and narrative appeal. The results are discussed in terms of the utility of these domains for understanding the reciprocal relationship between audience values and media response.

[1]  Geoff F. Kaufman,et al.  Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds , 2004 .

[2]  Allison Eden,et al.  The Influence of Morality Subcultures on the Acceptance and Appeal of Violence , 2012 .

[3]  Lawrence J. Walker.  Gender and Morality , 2006 .

[4]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  J. Haidt,et al.  Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues , 2004, Daedalus.

[6]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Viewer's Moral Sanction of Retribution in the Appreciation of Dramatic Presentations. , 1975 .

[7]  W. Hofmann,et al.  Immediate affect as a basis for intuitive moral judgement: An adaptation of the affect misattribution procedure , 2010 .

[8]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  How (and where) does moral judgment work? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  C. Atkin,et al.  Selective exposure to televised violence , 1979 .

[10]  J. Hyde,et al.  Gender differences in moral orientation: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  M. Oliver.  Exploring the Paradox of the Enjoyment of Sad Films , 1993 .

[12]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use , 2009 .

[13]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[14]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development , 2009 .

[15]  Mary Beth Oliver,et al.  Predictors of Viewing and Enjoyment of Reality-Based and Fictional Crime Shows , 1995 .

[16]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations [2nd edition]: Geert Hofstede , 2005 .

[17]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Victim reactions in aggressive erotic films as a factor in violence against women. , 1981, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Moral Judgment and Crime Drama: An Integrated Theory of Enjoyment , 2002 .

[19]  Arthur A. Raney.  Expanding Disposition Theory: Reconsidering Character Liking, Moral Evaluations, and Enjoyment , 2004 .

[20]  Barbara J. Wilson.  Affective Response of Nonretarded and Retarded Children to the Emotions of a Protagonist. , 1986 .

[21]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  Media and the moral mind , 2012 .

[22]  December,et al.  The moral mind : How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues , and perhaps even modules , 2007 .

[23]  M. Oliver.  Tender Affective States as Predictors of Entertainment Preference , 2008 .

[24]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  Testing a Dual-Process Model of Media Enjoyment and Appreciation , 2014 .

[25]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Moral Foundations Questionnaire , 2011 .

[26]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal. , 2000 .

[27]  J. Bryant,et al.  Responding to the screen : reception and reaction processes , 1991 .

[28]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion , 2010 .

[29]  Roland Mangold.  Dolf Zillmann & Peter Vorderer (eds.): Media Entertainment. The Psychology of its Appeal, Mahwah/New Jersey 2000 , 2000 .

[30]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Functional Networks in Emotional Moral and Nonmoral Social Judgments , 2002, NeuroImage.

[31]  P. Eslinger,et al.  Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: preliminary functional MRI results in normal subjects. , 2001, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[32]  L. Kohlberg.  Essays On Moral Development , 1981 .

[33]  Mina Tsay,et al.  The impact of perceived character similarity and identification on moral disengagement , 2011, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[34]  D. Zillmann.  The logic of suspense and mystery. , 1991 .

[35]  J. Graham,et al.  When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize , 2007 .

[36]  Neil Vidmar,et al.  Archie Bunker's Bigotry: A Study in Selective Perception and Exposure , 1974 .

[37]  R. Bhagat.  Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[38]  Allison Eden,et al.  Predicting popularity of mass-market films using the tenets of disposition theory , 2011, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[39]  Sharon Lamb,et al.  The Emergence of Morality in Young Children , 1988 .

[40]  Meghan S. Sanders.  Making a Good (Bad) Impression: Examining the Cognitive Processes of Disposition Theory to Form a Synthesized Model of Media Character Impression Formation , 2010 .

[41]  Allison Eden,et al.  Seeing Bad People Punished Makes Us Think Alike: Social Norm Violations in Television Drama Elicit Cortical Synchronization in Viewers , 2011 .

[42]  J. Haidt,et al.  The Moral Emotions , 2009 .

[43]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  A Model of Intuitive Morality and Exemplars , 2012 .

[44]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[45]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  Soap Opera Exposure and Enjoyment: A Longitudinal Test of Disposition Theory , 2008 .

[46]  Richard A. Shweder,et al.  The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "big three" explanations of suffering. , 1997 .

[47]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  Moral Intuition and Media Entertainment , 2011, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[48]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  The effect of suspense and its resolution on the appreciation of dramatic presentations , 1975 .

[49]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[50]  L. R. Huesmann,et al.  Violent media effects , 2009 .