Esophageal perforation: the importance of early diagnosis and primary repair.

SUMMARY.  Esophageal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, particularly if not diagnosed and treated promptly. Despite the many advances in thoracic surgery, the management of patients with esophageal perforation remains controversial. We performed a retrospective clinical review of 36 patients, 15 women (41.7%) and 21 men (58.3%), treated at our hospital for esophageal perforation between 1989 and 2002. The mean age was 54.3 years (range 7–76 years). Iatrogenic causes were found in 63.9% of perforations, foreign body perforation in 16.7%, traumatic perforation in 13.9% and spontaneous rupture in 5.5%. Perforation occurred in the cervical esophagus in 12 cases, thoracic esophagus in 13 and abdominal esophagus in 11. Pain was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in 24 patients (66.7%). Dyspnea was noted in 14 patients (38.9%), fever in 12 (33.3%) and subcutaneous emphysema in 25 (69.4%). Management of esophageal perforation included primary closure in 19 (52.8%), resection in seven (19.4%) and non-surgical therapy in 10 (27.8%). The 30-day mortality was found to be 13.9%, and mean hospital stay was 24.4 days. In the surgically treated group the mortality rate was three of 26 patients (11.5%), and two of 10 patients (20%) in the conservatively managed group. Survival was significantly influenced by a delay of more than 24 h in the initiation of treatment. Primary closure within 24 h resulted in the most favorable outcome. Esophageal perforation is a life threatening condition, and any delay in diagnosis and therapy remains a major contributor to the attendant mortality.

[1]  A. Cangır,et al.  Management of Esophageal Perforation , 2001, Surgery Today.

[2]  J. Miller,et al.  Esophageal perforation: emphasis on management. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  J. Wain,et al.  Reinforced primary repair of thoracic esophageal perforation. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  R. Ginsberg,et al.  Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  T. Coughlin,et al.  Esophageal perforation: a therapeutic challenge. , 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  M. Orringer,et al.  Esophagectomy for esophageal disruption. , 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  K. Moghissi,et al.  Instrumental perforations of the oesophagus and their management. , 1988, Thorax.

[8]  Miller Re,et al.  Surgical management of complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and esophageal dilation including laser therapy. , 1987 .

[9]  J. Nesbitt,et al.  Surgical management of esophageal perforation. , 1987, The American surgeon.

[10]  J. Lowe,et al.  Diagnosis and recommended management of esophageal perforation and rupture. , 1986, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  McElvein Rb,et al.  Perforation of the esophagus: correlation of site and cause with plain film findings. , 1985 .

[12]  J. Bartelsman,et al.  Treatment of instrumental oesophageal perforation. , 1984, Gut.

[13]  B. Skov Jensen,et al.  Perforation and rupture of the esophagus. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  R. Malt,et al.  Operative and Nonoperative Management of Esophageal Perforations , 1981, Annals of surgery.

[15]  J. Cooper,et al.  The management of nonmalignant intrathoracic esophageal perforations. , 1980, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  P. Pairolero,et al.  Esophagomyotomy versus forceful dilation for achalasia of the esophagus: results in 899 patients. , 1979, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  E. W. Wilkins,et al.  Esophageal repair following late diagnosis of intrathoracic perforation. , 1975, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  A. Millard.  “Spontaneous” perforation of the oesophagus treated by utilization of a pericardial flap , 1971, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  L. Bryant,et al.  Experimental evaluation of intercostal pedicle grafts in esophageal repair. , 1965, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.