Young consumers' innovativeness and hedonic/utilitarian cool attitudes

Purpose – This study aims to investigate the relationship between young consumers' innovativeness and their hedonic/utilitarian attitudes toward cool clothing and to examine the moderating role of income on this relationship. This study uses five cool factors (singular cool, personal cool, aesthetic cool, functional cool and quality cool) under the hedonic and utilitarian cool dimensions to test the hypotheses. Design/methodology/approach – Using a web-based survey, 265 responses were used for analysis. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the measurement scales. Single-group SEM and multiple-group SEM were performed to examine the hypothesized relationships. Findings – Innovative young consumers tend to have stronger hedonic cool attitude toward clothing than non-innovative young consumers. In contrast, innovativeness and utilitarian values of cool products are not interrelated for young consumers. Innovative, high-income young consumes have a tendency to purchase cool products to refle...

[1]  Andrew Dunsire,et al.  Tipping the Balance , 1996 .

[2]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[3]  Nick Southgate.  Coolhunting with Aristotle , 2003 .

[4]  David G. Taylor,et al.  Investigating generational differences in e-WOM behaviours , 2011 .

[5]  Youn-Kyung Kim,et al.  Teens' Mall Shopping Motivations: Functions of Loneliness and Media Usage , 2003 .

[6]  Yolanda Polo,et al.  Adopter categories in the acceptance process for consumer durables , 1996 .

[7]  William R. Darden,et al.  Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value , 1994 .

[8]  D. Midgley,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Product Form Innovation: The Interaction between Predispositions and Social Messages , 1993 .

[9]  L. Flynn,et al.  Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales , 1996 .

[10]  P. Sullivan,et al.  CAUSE RELATED MARKETING: HOW GENERATION Y RESPONDS , 2003 .

[11]  C. Flavián,et al.  The acceptance and diffusion of new consumer durables: differences between first and last adopters , 1998 .

[12]  Pierre Beaudoin,et al.  Fashion innovativeness, fashion diffusion and brand sensitivity among adolescents , 2003 .

[13]  L. Flynn,et al.  Identifying Innovators in Consumer Product Markets , 1992 .

[14]  Yassir M. Samra,et al.  Impact of Personal Values and Innovativeness on Hedonic and Utilitarian Aspects of Web Use: An Empirical Study among United States Teenagers , 2008 .

[15]  Clive Nancarrow,et al.  An analysis of the concept of cool and its marketing implications , 2002 .

[16]  M. Kirton.  Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[17]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs , 1998 .

[18]  Ann Marie Fiore,et al.  Psychographic characteristics affecting behavioral intentions towards pop‐up retail , 2010 .

[19]  Kevin E. Voss,et al.  Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude , 2003 .

[20]  L. Turley,et al.  Malls and consumption motivation: an exploratory examination of older Generation Y consumers , 2004 .

[21]  J. Chébat,et al.  The shopping experience of female fashion leaders , 2007 .

[22]  Alan Tapp,et al.  Social Marketing and the Meaning of Cool , 2008 .

[23]  Graham Saxton.  Collections of cool , 2005 .

[24]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[25]  Dannie Kjeldgaard.  Youth Identities in the Global Cultural Economy , 2003 .

[26]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[27]  Juliet B. Schor,et al.  Born to Buy: The Commercialized Child and the New Consumer Culture , 2004 .

[28]  E. Hirschman,et al.  The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun , 1982 .

[29]  Jane E. Workman,et al.  Fashion Opinion Leadership, Fashion Innovativeness, and Need for Variety , 1993 .

[30]  Paul Herbig,et al.  Marketing to the baby bust generation , 1993 .

[31]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Benefits , 2008 .

[32]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Form versus Function: How the Intensities of Specific Emotions Evoked in Functional versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediate Product Preferences , 2007 .

[33]  E. Hirschman.  Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity , 1980 .

[34]  I. Grant,et al.  Buying behaviour of “tweenage” girls and key societal communicating factors influencing their purchasing of fashion clothing , 2005 .

[35]  Rajagopal.  Impact of radio advertisements on buying behaviour of urban commuters , 2011 .

[36]  Veronika Kalmus,et al.  What makes me cool? Estonian tweens' interpretative repertoires , 2009 .

[37]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  Young fashion leaders’ and followers’ attitudes toward American and imported apparel , 1998 .

[38]  David Robins,et al.  Cool Rules: Anatomy of an Attitude , 2000 .

[39]  Rodney C. Runyan,et al.  What is cool? Operationalizing the construct in an apparel context , 2013 .

[40]  Ravindra Chitturi,et al.  Emotions by Design: A Consumer Perspective , 2009 .

[41]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior , 2003 .