Incident Tree Model and Incident Tree Analysis Method for Quantified Risk Assessment: An In-depth Accident Study in Traffic Operation

Fault tree analysis (FTA) is a logically structured process that can help identify potential causes of system failure before the failures actually occur. However, FTA often suffers from a lack of enough probabilistic basic events to check the consistency of the logic relationship among all events through linkage with gates. Sometimes, even logic relationship among all events is difficult to determine, and failures in system operation may have been experienced rarely or not at all. In order to address the limitations, this paper proposes a novel incident tree methodology that characterizes the information flow in a system instead of logical relationship, and the amount of information of a fuzzy incident instead of probability of an event. From probability statistics to fuzzy information quantities of basic incidents and accident, we propose an incident tree model and incident tree analysis (ITA) method for identification of uncertain, random, complex, possible and variable characteristic of accident occurrence in quantified risk assessment. In our research, a much detailed example for demonstrating how to create an incident tree model has been conducted by an in-depth analysis of traffic accident causation. The case study of vehicle-leaving-roadway accident with ITA illustrates that the proposed methodology may not only capture the essential information transformations of accident that occur in system operation, but also determine the various combinations of hardware faults, software failures and human errors that could result in the occurrence of specified undesired incident at the system level even accident.

[1]  Roger C. Conant,et al.  Laws of Information which Govern Systems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  T. Bedford,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2001 .

[3]  Hiromitsu Kumamoto,et al.  Satisfying Safety Goals by Probabilistic Risk Assessment , 2007 .

[4]  Yanjun Wang,et al.  A new algorithm for computer-aided fault tree synthesis , 2002 .

[5]  Muhittin Celik,et al.  A risk-based modelling approach to enhance shipping accident investigation , 2010 .

[6]  Hideo Tanaka,et al.  Fault-Tree Analysis by Fuzzy Probability , 1983 .

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[8]  Alyson G. Wilson,et al.  A fully Bayesian approach for combining multilevel failure information in fault tree quantification and optimal follow-on resource allocation , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Pete Thomas,et al.  Conducting in-depth accident studies , 1993 .

[10]  Gerd Szwillus,et al.  Combining task analysis and fault tree analysis for accident and incident analysis: a case study from Bulgaria. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  John Andrews,et al.  Reliability and Risk Assessment , 1994 .

[12]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[13]  W. Yun,et al.  Fault tree analysis with fuzzy gates , 1997 .

[14]  GlLLES Malaterre,et al.  Error analysis and in-depth accident studies , 1990 .

[15]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Methodology for computer aided fuzzy fault tree analysis , 2009 .

[16]  Ajit Srividya,et al.  Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Carol Smidts,et al.  The Event Sequence Diagram framework for dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment , 1999 .

[18]  R. S. Chanda,et al.  A reliability approach to transmission expansion planning using fuzzy fault-tree model , 1998 .

[19]  Harold E. Roland,et al.  System Safety Engineering and Management , 1983 .

[20]  Wolfgang Kröger,et al.  Risk analyses of transportation on road and railway from a European Perspective , 2002 .

[21]  Lotte Larsen,et al.  Methods of multidisciplinary in-depth analyses of road traffic accidents. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  Salvatore J. Bavuso,et al.  Dynamic fault-tree models for fault-tolerant computer systems , 1992 .

[23]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Development of a Hazard and Operability-based method for identifying safety management vulnerabilities in high risk systems , 1998 .

[24]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[25]  N. Siu,et al.  Risk assessment for dynamic systems: An overview , 1994 .

[26]  J. B. Dugan,et al.  Automatic synthesis of fault trees for computer-based systems , 1999 .

[27]  Poong Hyun Seong,et al.  Investigation on relationship between information flow rate and mental workload of accident diagnosis tasks in NPPs , 2006 .

[28]  Zahra Mohaghegh,et al.  Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment of complex socio-technical systems: Principles and theoretical foundations , 2009 .

[29]  Jorma Saari,et al.  The accident consequence tree method and its application by real-time data collection in the Finnish furniture industry , 1996 .

[30]  Shigeru Yanagi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of a fault tree with priority AND gates , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Information Flows in Hierarchical Networks and the Capability of Organizations to Successfully Respond to Failures, Crises, and Disasters , 2006 .

[32]  Suprasad V. Amari,et al.  A new approach to solve dynamic fault trees , 2003, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003..

[33]  S Stradling,et al.  Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? , 1990, Ergonomics.

[34]  Yanxiang He,et al.  Fault tree and formal methods in system safety analysis , 2004, The Fourth International Conference onComputer and Information Technology, 2004. CIT '04..

[35]  Borut Mavko,et al.  A dynamic fault tree , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[36]  D. Singer A fuzzy set approach to fault tree and reliability analysis , 1990 .

[37]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Fault Trees vs. Event Trees in Reliability Analysis , 1984 .

[38]  Marc Bouissou,et al.  A new formalism that combines advantages of fault-trees and Markov models: Boolean logic driven Markov processes , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  N. Shiraishi,et al.  Fuzzy importance in fault tree analysis , 1984 .

[40]  Toshio Wakabayashi,et al.  Component-based modeling of systems for automated fault tree generation , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[41]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Identifying Accident-Prone Locations Using Fuzzy Pattern Recognition , 1995 .

[42]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Improvement of Highway Safety I: Identification of Causal Factors Through Fault‐Tree Modeling1 , 1995 .

[43]  Wuhong Wang A Digital-Driving System for Smart Vehicles , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[44]  Paul D. Hollywell Incorporating human dependent failures in risk assessments to improve estimates of actual risk , 1996 .

[45]  Yanjun Wang,et al.  QRA Study of an Activated Carbon Filter Safeguard System , 2005 .

[46]  Vicki M. Bier Challenges to the Acceptance of Probabilistic Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[47]  Wuhong Wang,et al.  Measurement of dangerous traffic conditions through driving dependability analysis , 2010 .

[48]  Frank J. Groen,et al.  QRAS - the quantitative risk assessment system , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..