Theta-burst TMS of lateral occipital cortex reduces BOLD responses across category-selective areas in ventral temporal cortex

Human visual cortex contains three scene-selective regions in the lateral, medial and ventral cortex, termed the occipital place area (OPA), medial place area (MPA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), all three regions respond more strongly when viewing visual scenes compared with isolated objects or faces. To determine how these regions are functionally and causally connected, we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation to OPA and measured fMRI responses before and after stimulation, using a theta-burst paradigm (TBS). To test for stimulus category-selectivity, we presented a range of visual categories (scenes, buildings, objects, faces). To test for specificity of any effects to TBS of OPA we employed two control conditions: Sham, with no TBS stimulation, and an active TBS-control with TBS to a proximal face-selective cortical region (occipital face area, or OFA). We predicted that TBS to OPA (but not OFA) would lead to decreased responses to scenes and buildings (but not other categories) in other scene-selective cortical regions. Across both ROI and whole-volume analyses, we observed decreased responses to scenes in PPA as a result of TBS. However, these effects were neither category specific, with decreased responses to all stimulus categories, nor limited to scene-selective regions, with decreases also observed in face-selective fusiform face area (FFA). Furthermore, similar effects were observed with TBS to OFA, thus effects were not specific to the stimulation site in the lateral occipital cortex. Whilst these data are suggestive of a causal, but non-specific relationship between lateral occipital and ventral temporal cortex, we discuss several factors that could have underpinned this result, such as the differences between TBS and online TMS, the role of anatomical distance between stimulated regions and how TMS effects are operationalised. Furthermore, our findings highlight the importance of active control conditions in brain stimulation experiments to accurately assess functional and causal connectivity between specific brain regions.

[1]  Brian N. Pasley,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Elicits Coupled Neural and Hemodynamic Consequences , 2007, Science.

[2]  Gang Chen,et al.  Theta-burst TMS to the posterior superior temporal sulcus decreases resting-state fMRI connectivity across the face processing network , 2020, Network Neuroscience.

[3]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Trained to silence: Progressive signal inhibition during short visuo-motor training , 2016, NeuroImage.

[4]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Targeted enhancement of cortical-hippocampal brain networks and associative memory , 2014, Science.

[5]  Mark Hymers,et al.  Specialized and independent processing of orientation and shape in visual field maps LO1 and LO2 , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Superior Temporal Sulcus Is Causally Connected to the Amygdala: A Combined TBS-fMRI Study , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Chris I. Baker,et al.  Evaluating the correspondence between face-, scene-, and object-selectivity and retinotopic organization within lateral occipitotemporal cortex , 2016, Journal of vision.

[8]  Jennifer K. E. Steeves,et al.  TMS to the Lateral Occipital Cortex Disrupts Object Processing but Facilitates Scene Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  The effect of theta-burst TMS on cognitive control networks measured with resting state fMRI , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[11]  Jennifer C. Britton,et al.  Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis , 2013, NeuroImage.

[12]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[14]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Targeted enhancement of cortical-hippocampal brain networks and associative memory , 2014 .

[15]  B. Wandell,et al.  Mapping Hv4 and Ventral Occipital Cortex: the Venous Eclipse , 2022 .

[16]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A Retinotopic Basis for the Division of High-Level Scene Processing between Lateral and Ventral Human Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[18]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[19]  Lily M. Solomon-Harris,et al.  TMS to object cortex affects both object and scene remote networks while TMS to scene cortex only affects scene networks , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Combined TMS and fMRI Reveal Dissociable Cortical Pathways for Dynamic and Static Face Perception , 2014, Current Biology.

[22]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[23]  Jennifer K. E. Steeves,et al.  Consecutive TMS-fMRI reveals remote effects of neural noise to the “occipital face area” , 2016, Brain Research.

[24]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Ten Years of Theta Burst Stimulation in Humans: Established Knowledge, Unknowns and Prospects , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  Caitlin R Mullin,et al.  Consecutive TMS-fMRI Reveals an Inverse Relationship in BOLD Signal between Object and Scene Processing , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  C. Baker,et al.  Scene-Selectivity and Retinotopy in Medial Parietal Cortex , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Jennifer K. E. Steeves,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Transverse Occipital Sulcus Affects Scene but Not Object Processing , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  A. Razi,et al.  The physiological effects of noninvasive brain stimulation fundamentally differ across the human cortex , 2020, Science Advances.

[31]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Distinct contributions of functional and deep neural network features to representational similarity of scenes in human brain and behavior , 2018, eLife.

[34]  A. Barker,et al.  NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.

[35]  J. Devlin,et al.  Triple Dissociation of Faces, Bodies, and Objects in Extrastriate Cortex , 2009, Current Biology.

[36]  Fei-Fei Li,et al.  Differential connectivity within the Parahippocampal Place Area , 2013, NeuroImage.

[37]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[38]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Long‐lasting enhancements of memory and hippocampal‐cortical functional connectivity following multiple‐day targeted noninvasive stimulation , 2015, Hippocampus.

[39]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Evidence for a Third Visual Pathway Specialized for Social Perception , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[41]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation , 2016, Current Biology.

[42]  Preston P. Thakral,et al.  Modulation of hippocampal brain networks produces changes in episodic simulation and divergent thinking , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Tiangang Zhou,et al.  Perceptual learning modifies the functional specializations of visual cortical areas , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.