Separate versus Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Two‐Step Steam Pretreated Softwood for Ethanol Production

Abstract In two previous studies, optimal conditions were identified for two‐step steam pretreatment of SO2‐ and H2SO4‐impregnated softwood. In the present study the yield of sugar and ethanol was determined in a process development unit where pretreatment was performed in a 10‐L reactor and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) or enzymatic hydrolysis (EH) were performed in 30‐L reactors. The study showed that a steam pretreatment reactor should be larger than 2 L to yield acceptable results. Two pretreatment combinations were studied. In the H2SO4 case, the first pretreatment step was at 180°C for 10 min with 0.5% H2SO4 and the second step at 210°C for 2 min with 1% H2SO4. In the SO2 case, first step was at 190°C for 2 min followed by a second step at 210°C for 5 min. The concentration of SO2 was 3% in both steps. EH and SSF were performed on the whole slurry after the second pretreatment step to determine the yield of sugars and ethanol. The liquid after the first pretreatment step was also analyzed and fermented. When SSF and EH were performed at the same dry matter content and enzymatic activity, the ethanol yield in SSF exceeded the yield obtained with EH in both pretreatment cases, even when 100% yield in the fermentation step was assumed. Thus SSF is a better process if yield is the main priority. Comparison of the yields with the two acid catalysts showed higher yields with SO2 in both SSF and EH. The overall ethanol yield following SSF of SO2‐impregnated and pretreated wood reached 81% of the theoretical, that is, 357 liters per metric ton of dry raw material.

[1]  M. Galbe,et al.  Two-step steam pretreatment of softwood by dilute H2SO4 impregnation for ethanol production , 2003 .

[2]  M. Galbe,et al.  A review of the production of ethanol from softwood , 2002, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[3]  F. Nadim,et al.  OPTIMIZING ACID-HYDROLYSIS: A CRITICAL STEP FOR PRODUCTION OF ETHANOL FROM MIXED WOOD CHIPS , 2002 .

[4]  M. Galbe,et al.  Reduced inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. , 2001, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[5]  John N. Saddler,et al.  Optimization of monosaccharide recovery by post-hydrolysis of the water-soluble hemicellulose component after steam explosion of softwood chips , 2000 .

[6]  M. Galbe,et al.  Effect of substrate and cellulase concentration on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated softwood for ethanol production. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  Robinson,et al.  Fermentability of the hemicellulose-derived sugars from steam-exploded softwood (douglas fir) , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  Michael M. Wu,et al.  Optimization of steam explosion to enhance hemicellulose recovery and enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in softwoods , 1999 .

[9]  Melvin P. Tucker,et al.  Dilute acid hydrolysis of softwoods , 1999 .

[10]  J. Saddler,et al.  The nature of lignin from steam explosion/enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood , 1999, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[11]  Mats Galbe,et al.  Optimisation of steam pretreatment of SO2-impregnated mixed softwoods for ethanol production , 1998 .

[12]  D. Schell,et al.  Pretreatment of softwood by acid-catalyzed steam explosion followed by alkali extraction , 1998 .

[13]  Melvin P. Tucker,et al.  Dilute acid pretreatment of softwoods , 1998 .

[14]  Mats Galbe,et al.  Comparison of SO2 and H2SO4 impregnation of softwood prior to steam pretreatment on ethanol production , 1998 .

[15]  Guido Zacchi,et al.  Simultaneous detoxification and enzyme production of hemicellulose hydrolysates obtained after steam pretreatment , 1997 .

[16]  M. Galbe,et al.  Design and operation of a bench-scale process development unit for the production of ethanol from lignocellulosics , 1996 .

[17]  Guido Zacchi,et al.  Ethanol from lignocellulosics: A review of the economy , 1996 .

[18]  P. H. Dare,et al.  Steam Explosion of the Softwood Pinus Radiata with Sulphur Dioxide Addition. II. Process Characterisation , 1989 .

[19]  John N. Saddler,et al.  Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Steam Treated Aspen Wood: Influence of Partial Hemicellulose and Lignin Removal Prior to Pretreatment , 1988 .

[20]  M. Galbe,et al.  Combined use of H2SO4 and SO2 impregnation for steam pretreatment of spruce in ethanol production , 2003, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[21]  M. Galbe,et al.  Two-step steam pretreatment of softwood with SO2 impregnation for ethanol production , 2002, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[22]  M. Galbe,et al.  Influence of Enzyme Loading and Physical Parameters on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Steam‐Pretreated Softwood , 2001, Biotechnology progress.

[23]  A. Aden,et al.  Continuous countercurrent extraction of hemicellulose from pretreated wood residues , 2001, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[24]  F. P. Eddy,et al.  Two-stage dilute-acid pretreatment of softwoods , 2000, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[25]  M. Galbe,et al.  The influence of lactic acid formation on the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of softwood to ethanol , 2000 .

[26]  D. Gregg,et al.  Steam Pretreatment of Douglas-Fir Wood Chips Can Conditions for Optimum Hemicellulose Recovery Still Provide Adequate Access for Efficient Enzymatic Hydrolysis? , 2000 .

[27]  D. Gregg,et al.  Techno-economic evaluations of a generic wood-to-ethanol process: effect of increased cellulose yields and enzyme recycle , 1998 .

[28]  Ralph P. Overend,et al.  Fractionation of Populus tremuloides at the pilot plant scale: optimization of steam pretreatment conditions using the STAKE II technology , 1991 .

[29]  T. Clark,et al.  Steam Explosion of the Softwood Pinus Radiata with Sulphur Dioxide Addition. I. Process Optimisation , 1987 .