Influence of axial turbine efficiency maps on the performance of subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle systems

The utilization of low-to-medium enthalpy geothermal resources for electricity generation is commonly done using the binary cycle power plant technology. The low temperature of the geothermal fluid necessarily results in low thermal efficiencies but it can be profitably used as a driver to reduce the equipment cost. In particular, single stage axial flow turbines, a cheaper option compared to multistage solutions, can be used due to the moderate enthalpy drop in the expansion process. In this work the design performance of ORCs (Organic Rankine Cycle systems) equipped with single stage axial flow turbines is optimized for utilization of a 150 °C geothermal fluid. Accurate predictions of turbine efficiency are included in the optimization procedure to take into account the influence of the thermodynamic cycle parameters, fluid properties and size on the maximum achievable efficiency. A set of six fluids is considered to examine a wide spectrum of design conditions. Results show that supercritical ORCs outperform subcritical ORCs even taking into account the detrimental effect of high expansion ratios on turbine efficiency. Hydrofluoroolefins are found to exhibit a net power output approximately equal or even higher than the best hydrofluorocarbons.

[1]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Economic system optimization of air-cooled organic Rankine cycles powered by low-temperature geothermal heat sources , 2015 .

[2]  Gabriele Raabe,et al.  Evaluation of R-1234ze(Z) as drop-in replacement for R-245fa in Organic Rankine Cycles – From thermophysical properties to cycle performance , 2015 .

[3]  Markus Preißinger,et al.  Low grade waste heat recovery with subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle based on natural refrigerants and their binary mixtures , 2015 .

[4]  Wei Liu,et al.  Optimal Heat Source Temperature for thermodynamic optimization of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles , 2015 .

[5]  Ricardo Martinez-Botas,et al.  Design methodology for radial turbo expanders in mobile organic Rankine cycle applications , 2015 .

[6]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Performance characterization of a power generation unit–organic Rankine cycle system based on the efficiencies of the system components , 2015 .

[7]  Y. Duan,et al.  Parametric optimization and performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles using R600a/R601a mixtures as working fluids , 2015 .

[8]  Chun-Mei Wu,et al.  Payback period estimation and parameter optimization of subcritical organic Rankine cycle system for waste heat recovery , 2015 .

[9]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Efficiency Prediction for Axial-Flow Turbines Operating with Nonconventional Fluids , 1981 .

[10]  Xing Wang,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of system parameters on the performance of the Organic Rankine Cycle system for binary-cycle geothermal power plants , 2014 .

[11]  Carlos De Miranda Ventura,et al.  Recuperated power cycle analysis model: Investigation and optimisation of low-to-moderate resource temperature Organic Rankine Cycles , 2015 .

[12]  Ian C. Kemp,et al.  Pinch Analysis and Process Integration: A User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy , 2007 .

[13]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  A New Criterion to Optimize ORC Design Performance using Efficiency Correlations for Axial and Radial Turbines , 2014 .

[14]  Ben-Ran Fu,et al.  Design, construction, and preliminary results of a 250-kW organic Rankine cycle system , 2015 .

[15]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  Predicting the optimum design of single stage axial expanders in ORC systems: Is there a single efficiency map for different working fluids? , 2016 .

[16]  Jialing Zhu,et al.  Parametric optimization and performance analysis of zeotropic mixtures for an organic Rankine cycle driven by low-medium temperature geothermal fluids , 2015 .

[17]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Design Criteria and Efficiency Prediction for Radial Inflow Turbines , 1987 .

[18]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  A general framework to select working fluid and configuration of ORCs for low-to-medium temperature heat sources , 2015 .

[19]  Steven Lecompte,et al.  Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery , 2015 .

[20]  Tzu-Chen Hung,et al.  Thermoeconomic comparison between pure and mixture working fluids of organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery , 2015 .

[21]  Joaquín Navarro-Esbrí,et al.  Performance evaluation of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for power applications from low grade heat sources , 2015 .

[22]  Fredrik Haglind,et al.  Design and optimization of a novel organic Rankine cycle with improved boiling process , 2015 .

[23]  Gang Li,et al.  Organic Rankine cycle performance evaluation and thermoeconomic assessment with various applications part I: Energy and exergy performance evaluation , 2016 .

[24]  Min-Hsiung Yang,et al.  Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application , 2016 .

[25]  Andrea Toffolo,et al.  A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems , 2014 .

[26]  Tailu Li,et al.  Two-stage evaporation strategy to improve system performance for organic Rankine cycle , 2015 .

[27]  Salman Ajib,et al.  Evaluation of mixtures performances in Organic Rankine Cycle when utilizing the geothermal water with and without cogeneration , 2015 .

[28]  Patrick Linke,et al.  Novel and conventional working fluid mixtures for solar Rankine cycles: Performance assessment and multi-criteria selection , 2015 .