Temporal Effects of Alignment in Text-Based, Task-Oriented Discourse

Communicative alignment refers to adaptation to one's communication partner. Temporal aspects of such alignment have been little explored. This article examines temporal aspects of lexical and syntactic alignment (i.e., tendencies to use the interlocutor's lexical items and syntactic structures) in task-oriented discourse. In particular, we investigate whether lexical and syntactic alignment increases throughout the discourse and whether alignment contributes to speedy task completion. We present data from a text-based chat game in which participants instructed each other on where to place objects in a grid. Our methodological approach allows calculating a robust baseline and revealed reliable lexical and syntactic alignment. However, only lexical alignment, but not syntactic alignment, was sensitive to temporal aspects in that only lexical alignment increased throughout the discourse and positively affected task completion time. We discuss how these results relate to the communicative task and mention implications for models of alignment.

[1]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Chat reference communication patterns and implications: applying politeness theory , 2007, J. Documentation.

[2]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Hcrc Map Task Corpus , 1991 .

[3]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  High Frequency Word Entrainment in Spoken Dialogue , 2008, ACL.

[4]  S. Brennan,et al.  When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions , 2003 .

[5]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Marije van Amelsvoort,et al.  Syntax drives phonological choice–even independently of word choice , 2010 .

[7]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[8]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The impact of delayed visual feedback on collaborative performance , 2006, CHI.

[9]  Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al.  Lexical entrainment and success in student engineering groups , 2012, 2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT).

[10]  S. Gries.  Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[11]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi.  Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English , 2005 .

[13]  M. Pickering,et al.  Syntactic priming in language production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  M. Pickering,et al.  The role of beliefs in lexical alignment: Evidence from dialogs with humans and computers , 2011, Cognition.

[15]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Priming of Syntactic Rules in Task-Oriented Dialogue and Spontaneous Conversation , 2006 .

[16]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Parsing Three German Treebanks: Lexicalized and Unlexicalized Baselines , 2008 .

[17]  Dan Klein,et al.  Fast Exact Inference with a Factored Model for Natural Language Parsing , 2002, NIPS.

[18]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[19]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[20]  Frank Keller,et al.  Parallelism in Coordination as an Instance of Syntactic Priming: Evidence from Corpus-based Modeling , 2005, HLT.

[21]  P. Healey,et al.  Divergence in Dialogue , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Eyetracking for two-person tasks with manipulation of a virtual world , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Kathleen M. Carbary,et al.  Conceptual Pacts , Syntactic Priming , and Referential Form , 2011 .

[26]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[27]  P. Healey,et al.  Tracking Lexical and Syntactic Alignment in Conversation , 2010 .

[28]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Introduction to Information Retrieval , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Referring as a Collaborative Process , 2003 .

[30]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: informing the development of virtual co-presence , 2002, CSCW '02.

[32]  B. Rossion,et al.  Fixation Patterns During Recognition of Personally Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[33]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming , 2006, Cognition.

[34]  R. Krauss,et al.  Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Predicting Success in Dialogue , 2007, ACL.

[36]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience , 2013, Cognition.

[37]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays : Evidence from written and spoken dialogue , 2008 .

[38]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  The Prosody of Backchannels in American English , 2007 .

[39]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue , 2014, Journal of Memory and Language.