Palbociclib for Residual High-Risk Invasive HR-Positive and HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer—The Penelope-B Trial

PURPOSE About one third of patients with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) will relapse. Thus, additional therapy is needed. Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor demonstrating efficacy in the metastatic setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) is a double-blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III study in women with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative primary breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane‐containing NACT and at high risk of relapse (clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3 or 2 and ypN+). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib 125 mg once daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28-day cycle in addition to endocrine therapy (ET). Primary end point is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Final analysis was planned after 290 iDFS events with a two-sided efficacy boundary P < .0463 because of two interim analyses. RESULTS One thousand two hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned. The median age was 49.0 years (range, 19-79), and the majority were ypN+ with Ki-67 ≤ 15%; 59.4% of patients had a clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3. 50.1% received aromatase inhibitor, and 33% of premenopausal women received a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog in addition to either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (92% complete), 308 events were confirmed. Palbociclib did not improve iDFS versus placebo added to ET-stratified hazard ratio, 0.93 (95% repeated CI, 0.74 to 1.17) and two-sided weighted log-rank test (Cui, Hung, and Wang) P = .525. There was no difference among the subgroups. Most common related serious adverse events were infections and vascular disorders in 113 (9.1%) patients with no difference between the treatment arms. Eight fatal serious adverse events (two palbociclib and six placebo) were reported. CONCLUSION Palbociclib for 1 year in addition to ET did not improve iDFS in women with residual invasive disease after NACT.

[1]  P. Neven,et al.  Abemaciclib Combined With Endocrine Therapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of HR+, HER2−, Node-Positive, High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer (monarchE) , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  E. Winer,et al.  A phase II feasibility study of palbociclib in combination with adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive invasive breast carcinoma. , 2019 .

[3]  P. Fasching,et al.  Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2‐Positive Breast Cancer , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Palbociclib in Addition to Letrozole as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: PALLET Trial. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  S. Loi,et al.  Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  C. Denkert,et al.  Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Palbociclib Combined with Fulvestrant in Premenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer and Prior Progression on Endocrine Therapy: PALOMA-3 Results. , 2017, The oncologist.

[8]  Sung-Bae Kim,et al.  Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Zachary L. Skidmore,et al.  NeoPalAna: Neoadjuvant Palbociclib, a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor, and Anastrozole for Clinical Stage 2 or 3 Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  M. Rezai,et al.  Zoledronate for patients with invasive residual disease after anthracyclines-taxane-based chemotherapy for early breast cancer - The Phase III NeoAdjuvant Trial Add-oN (NaTaN) study (GBG 36/ABCSG 29). , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[11]  R. Finn,et al.  Efficacy and safety of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as first-line treatment of ER-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: expanded analyses of subgroups from the randomized pivotal trial PALOMA-1/TRIO-18 , 2016, Breast Cancer Research.

[12]  S. Loi,et al.  Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[14]  P. Fasching,et al.  Ki67 Measured after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Primary Breast Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  P. Fasching,et al.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Cyrus R Mehta,et al.  Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: A practical guide with examples , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  S. Loibl,et al.  Evaluating the impact of Relative Total Dose Intensity (RTDI) on patients' short and long-term outcome in taxane- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer- a pooled analysis , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[19]  Dawn L Hershman,et al.  Early discontinuation and nonadherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in a cohort of 8,769 early-stage breast cancer patients. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Sally Hunsberger,et al.  Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Victor Siskind,et al.  Quantification of completeness of follow-up , 2002, The Lancet.

[22]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Modification of Sample Size in Group Sequential Clinical Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[23]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[24]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Utility of the CPS+EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2016, European journal of cancer.