Fouling characterisation in membrane bioreactors

Abstract Compared with conventional wastewater treatment processes, membrane bioreactors offer several advantages, e.g. high biodegradation efficiency, smaller sludge production and compactness. However, membrane fouling is the main limitation to faster development of this process. An experimental study has been performed using hollow fibers (pore size 0.1 μm) immersed in an aerated tank for treating synthetic wastewater representative of dairy effluent. For the same organic load (5.7 kg COD/m3 per day) the COD removal efficiency, the sludge production and fouling ability were compared in three reactors operated at different sludge ages (10, 20 and 30 days). COD removal was high: 95–97.5%. The sludge production decreased from 0.31 to 0.16 kg MLSS/kg CODremoved when the sludge age increased from 10 to 30 days. Concerning the fouling ability of the sludge, a specific experiment (measurement of the specific resistance and hydraulic resistance during filtration) was designed to determine the influence on membrane fouling of the three fractions of the sludge: suspended solids, colloids and solutes. All the experiments confirm the importance of the interstitial matter — colloids and solutes — in membrane fouling. Consequently, bubbling can be expected to be only partially efficient, as bubbles are efficient for limiting particle deposition and polarisation phenomena, but not for internal fouling. Increasing the air flow rate from 1.2 to 3.6 m3/m2membrane area per hour, it was possible to decrease the total resistance — thus increasing the filtrate flux — by a ratio of 3. However, for given conditions of aeration, periodic backwashing gave an additional efficiency by decreasing internal fouling. In optimal conditions of backwashing (15 s every 5 min) the resistance could be decreased by 3.5-fold.

[1]  A. Fane,et al.  Crossflow Microfiltration of Biomass with Inorganic Membranes: The Influence of Membrane Surface and Fluid Dynamics , 1992 .

[2]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Nitrogen removal from sludge reject water with a membrane-assisted bioreactor. , 1999 .

[3]  Jaime Benítez,et al.  Stabilization and dewatering of wastewater using hollow fiber membranes , 1995 .

[4]  Steve Churchouse.  Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment — operating experiences with the Kubota submerged membrane activated sludge process , 1997 .

[5]  Y. Qian,et al.  Nitrification and mass balance with a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment , 1996 .

[6]  P. Cote,et al.  The use of immersed membranes for upgrading wastewater treatment plants , 1998 .

[7]  Alfons Vogelpohl,et al.  Wastewater treatment in a biological high-performance system with high biomass concentration , 1995 .

[8]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Household Membrane Bioreactor in Domestic Wastewater Treatment , 1993 .

[9]  Tatsuki Ueda,et al.  Effects of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 1997 .

[10]  Ahmadun Fakhru’l-Razi.  Ultrafiltration membrane separation for anaerobic wastewater treatment , 1994 .

[11]  Chettiyappan Visvanathan,et al.  Application of air backflushing technique in membrane bioreactor , 1997 .

[12]  A. Huyard,et al.  Membrane Bioreactor on Domestic Wastewater Treatment Sludge Production and Modeling Approach , 1991 .

[13]  Pierre Côté,et al.  Immersed membrane activated sludge for the reuse of municipal wastewater , 1997 .

[14]  El Hani Bouhabila,et al.  Microfiltration of activated sludge using submerged membrane with air bubbling (application to wastewater treatment) , 1998 .

[15]  B. Lacoste.  Etude d'un procédé de traitement des eaux usées sur membranes minérales par couplage microfiltraion ou ultrafiltration tangentielles et systèmes biologiques en aérobiose , 1992 .

[16]  K. Keiding,et al.  On the Stability of Activated Sludge Flocs with Implications to Dewatering , 1992 .

[17]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Organic stabilisation and nitrogen removal in a membrane separation bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment , 1993 .