Machine Trading: Theory, Advances, and Applications

Dynamic contributions to trading are evaluated using covariations between position and price changes over a horizon. Other performance measures such as Sharpe ratios, gain–loss ratios, acceptability indexes, and drawdowns are also employed. Machine learning strategies based on Gaussian process regression (GPR) are compared with least squares (LSQ). Furthermore, both are generalized by invoking conservative valuation schemes that lead to the study of conservative conditional expectations modeled by distorted expectations. The latter lead to the development of distorted least squares (DLSQ) and distorted Gaussian process regression (DGPR) as the associated estimation or prediction schemes. Trading strategies are executed for nine sectors of the US economy using 14 different predictive factor sets. Results indicate improvements are made by GPR, DGPR over LSQ, and DLSQ, with the distorted versions also favorably affecting the drawdowns. TOPICS: Statistical methods, simulations, big data/machine learning Key Findings • The authors demonstrate how finance theory reduced the potential contributions of data science by assumption. • The concept of conservative conditional expectations is defined, developed, and implemented to enhance predictive technologies such as least squares and Gaussian process regression. • Using factor attributes as input, the trading of stock return predictions classically and conservatively illustrates the practical benefits of the advocated theoretical advances.

[1]  A. Shiryaev,et al.  Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes , 1987 .

[2]  Stefan Tappe,et al.  Bilateral gamma distributions and processes in financial mathematics , 2008, 1907.09857.

[3]  Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  Processes of normal inverse Gaussian type , 1997, Finance Stochastics.

[4]  Pricing Derivative Securities , 2000 .

[5]  W. Schoutens,et al.  Zero covariation returns , 2017, Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk.

[6]  Dilip B. Madan,et al.  New Measures for Performance Evaluation , 2007 .

[7]  E. Seneta,et al.  The Variance Gamma (V.G.) Model for Share Market Returns , 1990 .

[8]  W. Schoutens,et al.  Applied Conic Finance , 2016 .

[9]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[10]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[11]  S. Kusuoka On law invariant coherent risk measures , 2001 .

[12]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[13]  Christian Kahl,et al.  Simulation of Square‐Root Processes , 2010 .

[14]  W. Schoutens,et al.  Bilateral Multiple Gamma Returns: Their Risks and Rewards , 2018, International Journal of Financial Engineering.

[15]  E. Eberlein Application of Generalized Hyperbolic Lévy Motions to Finance , 2001 .

[16]  Jakša Cvitanić,et al.  Introduction to the Economics and Mathematics of Financial Markets , 2004 .

[17]  R. Jarrow Continuous-Time Asset Pricing Theory , 2021, Springer Finance.

[18]  Dan Cornford,et al.  Gaussian Process Quantile Regression using Expectation Propagation , 2012, ICML.

[19]  P. Carr,et al.  The Variance Gamma Process and Option Pricing , 1998 .

[20]  A. Shiryaev Essentials of stochastic finance , 1999 .

[21]  E. Eberlein,et al.  Hyperbolic distributions in finance , 1995 .

[22]  D. Madan,et al.  Asymmetries in Financial Returns , 2017 .

[23]  M. Yor,et al.  The Fine Structure of Asset Retums : An Empirical Investigation ' , 2006 .

[24]  P. Protter Stochastic integration and differential equations , 1990 .

[25]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[26]  T. Alderweireld,et al.  A Theory for the Term Structure of Interest Rates , 2004, cond-mat/0405293.

[27]  W. Schoutens,et al.  Measuring And Monitoring The Efficiency Of Markets , 2017 .

[28]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..