Actionable insights with less data: guiding early building design decisions with streamlined probabilistic life cycle assessment

PurposeTwo obstacles that impede wider use of life cycle assessment (LCA) are its time- and data-intensiveness and the credibility surrounding its results—challenges that grow with the complexity of the product being analyzed. To guide the critical early-design stages of a complicated product like a building, it is important to be able to rapidly estimate environmental impacts with limited information, quantify the resulting uncertainty, and identify critical parameters where more detail is needed.MethodsThe authors have developed the Building Attribute to Impact Algorithm (BAIA) to demonstrate the use of streamlined (not scope-limiting), probabilistic LCA for guiding the design of a building from early stages of the design process when many aspects of the design are unknown or undecided. Early-design uncertainty is accommodated through under-specification—characterizing the design using the available level of detail—and capturing the resulting variability in predicted impacts through Monte Carlo simulations. Probabilistic triage with sensitivity analyses identifies which uncertain attributes should be specified further to increase the precision of the results. The speed of the analyses allows for sequentially refining key attributes and re-running the analyses until the predicted impacts are precise enough to inform decision-making, such as choosing a preferable design alternative.Results and discussionTwelve design variants for a hypothetical single-family residential building are analyzed. As information is sequentially added to each variant, the significance of the difference in performance between each variant pair is calculated to determine when enough information has been added to resolve the designs (identify which design is preferable) with high confidence. At the sixth step in the analysis, all variant pairs whose mean impacts differ by at least 4% are resolvable with 90% confidence, even though only six attributes are specified and dozens of attributes remain under-specified. Furthermore, the comparative results for each variant pair are validated against a set of conventional LCA results, showing that BAIA identifies the correct preferable design among each resolvable pair at this step.ConclusionsIterative specification guided by probabilistic triage can help identify promising early-design alternatives even when details are only provided for key attributes. The analysis of hypothetical design variants demonstrates that BAIA is both efficient (arrives at statistically defensible conclusions from design variant comparisons based on few pieces of information) and effective (identifies the same preferable design variants as conventional LCAs).

[1]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Streamlining the Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings by Structured Under‐Specification and Probabilistic Triage , 2019 .

[2]  Ignacio Zabalza,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: The ENSLIC simplified method and guidelines , 2011 .

[3]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Structured Under‐Specification of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Data for Building Assemblies , 2019 .

[4]  Weimin Wang,et al.  Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization , 2005 .

[5]  Karl G. Mueller,et al.  Parameterised inventories for life cycle assessment , 2004 .

[6]  R. Kleijn,et al.  Numerical approaches towards life cycle interpretation five examples , 2001 .

[7]  Francis Allard,et al.  Metamodeling the heating and cooling energy needs and simultaneous building envelope optimization for low energy building design in Morocco , 2015 .

[8]  S. Ranji Ranjithan,et al.  Multivariate regression as an energy assessment tool in early building design , 2012 .

[9]  Rob Marsh,et al.  LCA profiles for building components: strategies for the early design process , 2016 .

[10]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Relevance of simplifications in LCA of building components , 2009 .

[11]  Jason Brown,et al.  Assessment of uncertainty and confidence in building design exploration , 2015, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[12]  Mohammad Mottahedi,et al.  On the development of multi-linear regression analysis to assess energy consumption in the early stages of building design , 2014 .

[13]  Seongwon Seo,et al.  Automated Material Selection and Environmental Assessment in the Context of 3D Building Modelling , 2007 .

[14]  Toke Rammer Nielsen,et al.  Simple tool to evaluate energy demand and indoor environment in the early stages of building design , 2005 .

[15]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle approach in evaluating energy performance of residential buildings in Indian context , 2012 .

[16]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Building envelope shape design in early stages of the design process: Integrating architectural design systems and energy simulation , 2013 .

[17]  Braden Allenby,et al.  Matrix Approaches to Abridged Life Cycle Assessment , 1995 .

[18]  S. Ranji Ranjithan,et al.  An enhanced linear regression-based building energy model (LRBEM+) for early design , 2016 .

[19]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Exploring the viability of probabilistic under-specification to streamline life cycle assessment. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Keith Weitz,et al.  Case studies examining LCA streamlining techniques , 1998 .

[21]  Abhishek Srivastav,et al.  Baseline building energy modeling and localized uncertainty quantification using Gaussian mixture models , 2013 .

[22]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[24]  Kyle Konis,et al.  Passive performance and building form: An optimization framework for early-stage design support , 2016 .

[25]  Bernardette Soust-Verdaguer,et al.  Simplification in life cycle assessment of single-family houses: A review of recent developments , 2016 .

[26]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment , 1998 .

[28]  Rasmus Lund Jensen,et al.  Building simulations supporting decision making in early design – A review , 2016 .

[29]  Seunguk Na,et al.  BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING (BIM) BASED CO2 EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT IN THE EARLY DESIGN STAGE , 2017 .

[30]  Shana Smith,et al.  A predictive product attribute driven eco-design process using depth-first search , 2016 .

[31]  Bernardette Soust-Verdaguer,et al.  Critical review of bim-based LCA method to buildings , 2017 .

[32]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .

[33]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  A Methodology for Robust Comparative Life Cycle Assessments Incorporating Uncertainty. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Paulo Santos,et al.  A macro-component approach for the assessment of building sustainability in early stages of design , 2014 .

[35]  Ville Tulkki,et al.  The importance of input interactions in the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of nuclear fuel behavior , 2014 .

[36]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  A multi-objective feedback approach for evaluating sequential conceptual building design decisions , 2014 .

[37]  York Ostermeyer,et al.  Environmental Impact of Buildings--What Matters? , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Lynn Reis,et al.  An exploration of materials taxonomies to support streamlined life cycle assessment , 2013 .

[39]  Holly Wasilowski Samuelson,et al.  Parametric Energy Simulation in Early Design: High-Rise Residential Buildings in Urban Contexts , 2016 .

[40]  Rasmus Lund Jensen,et al.  Early Building Design: Informed decision-making by exploring multidimensional design space using sensitivity analysis , 2017 .

[41]  Alexander Hollberg,et al.  LCA in architectural design—a parametric approach , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[42]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Life cycle assessment use in the North American building community: summary of findings from a 2011/2012 survey , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[43]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Sequential early-design guidance for residential single-family buildings using a probabilistic metamodel of energy consumption , 2017 .