Managing Cockpit Crew Excess Task Load in Military Manned-Unmanned Teaming Missions by Dual-Mode Cognitive Automation Approaches

This work addresses approaches to enable the cockpit crew of a helicopter to manage multiple Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) while at the same time performing a military flight mission with the own air vehicle. Aiming for more flexibility and safety in combat, such Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) missions require a high level of interoperability between manned and unmanned assets. The resulting additional responsibilities pose extreme work demands to the cockpit crew. The key elements for achieving the workload reduction necessary to facilitate such missions are threefold: first, high-level human-UAV interaction based on tasks (supervisory control), second, the delegation of helicopter commander tasks to the pilot flying (modified crew coordination concept), and third, the introduction of knowledge-based assistant systems, one for each crewmember to support their individual task performance (cooperative control). We implemented the mentioned functionalities along the design guidelines of the so-called DualMode Cognitive Automation approach, in which the functions that the human operator interacts with in supervisory control (mode one) and cooperative control (mode two) are realized as artificial cognitive systems. These systems make use of cognitive task understanding, human-machine mixed-initiative interaction, human operator observation, and human mental resource prediction approaches. In addition to the concepts and methods behind the functionalities mentioned, this article describes comprehensive evaluation experiments conducted in our research helicopter mission simulator and discusses the corresponding results.

[1]  Reiner Onken,et al.  Modelling of Pilot Behaviour Using Petri Nets , 1994, Application and Theory of Petri Nets.

[2]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Cognitive cockpit engineering: Coupling functional state assessment, task knowledge management and decision support for context sensitive aiding , 2001 .

[3]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[4]  Reiner Onken,et al.  Evaluation of Intelligent On-Board Pilot Assistance in In-Flight Field Trials , 1995 .

[5]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT , 2000 .

[6]  Theodore B. Aldrich,et al.  A Methodology for Predicting Crew Workload in New Weapon Systems , 1986 .

[7]  Stephanie Guerlain,et al.  The Rotorcraft Pilot's Associate Cockpit Information Manager: Acceptable Behavior from a New Crew Member , 1999 .

[8]  J. A. Veltman,et al.  The Role of Operator State Assessment in Adaptive Automation , 2005 .

[9]  Ming Hou,et al.  Intelligent Adaptive Interfaces for the Control of Multiple UAVs , 2007 .

[10]  David J. Musliner,et al.  Delegation to Automation: Performance and Implications in Non-optimal Situations , 2011, HCI.

[11]  Miwa Hayashi Hidden Markov Models to identify pilot instrument scanning and attention patterns , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[12]  Axel Schulte,et al.  System-Ergonomic Design of Cognitive Automation: Dual-Mode Cognitive Design of Vehicle Guidance and Control Work Systems , 2010, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[13]  Reiner Onken,et al.  Intent and error recognition as part of a knowledge-based cockpit assistant , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[14]  Victor A. Riley,et al.  W/INDEX: A Predictive Model of Operator Workload , 1989 .

[15]  Reiner Onken,et al.  COSA – A generic cognitive system architecture based on a cognitive model of human behavior , 2003, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[16]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture , 1997, KR.

[17]  Axel Schulte,et al.  Measuring Self-adaptive UAV Operators' Load-Shedding Strategies under High Workload , 2011, HCI.

[18]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Predicting Controller Capacity in Supervisory Control of Multiple UAVs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[19]  Jamison S Hicks,et al.  AH-64D Apache Longbow Aircrew Workload Assessment for Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Employment , 2009 .

[20]  Yunfeng Zhang,et al.  Mode-of-disparities Error Correction of Eye-tracking Data , 2011 .

[21]  R. Onken,et al.  Empirical Modelling of Pilot's Visual Behaviour at Low Altitudes , 1995 .

[22]  Axel Schulte,et al.  Task-based Guidance of Multiple UAV Using Cognitive Automation , 2011 .

[23]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[24]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Wu,et al.  A Playbook Approach to Variable Autonomy Control: Application for Control of Multiple, Heterogeneous Unmanned Air Vehicles , 2004 .

[26]  Dan R. Olsen,et al.  Fan-out: measuring human control of multiple robots , 2004, CHI.

[27]  Steve,et al.  Collaborative Autonomy for Manned/Unmanned Teams , 2005 .

[28]  Stephen Whitlow,et al.  A playbook interface for mixed initiative control of multiple unmanned vehicle teams , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[29]  David N. Lee,et al.  Where we look when we steer , 1994, Nature.

[30]  Axel Schulte,et al.  Mental Resource Demands Prediction as a Key Element for Future Assistant Systems in Military Helicopters , 2011, HCI.

[31]  Axel Schulte,et al.  Human-UAV Co-operation Based on Artificial Cognition , 2009, HCI.

[32]  Tim Halverson,et al.  Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.