Physiological synchronization and entropy as measures of team cognitive load

The operating room (OR) is a high-risk and complex environment, where multiple specialized professionals work as a team to effectively care for patients in need of surgical interventions. Surgical tasks impose high cognitive demands on OR staff and cognitive overload may have deleterious effects on team performance and patient safety. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility and describe a novel methodological approach to characterize dynamic changes in team cognitive load by measuring synchronization and entropy of heart rate variability parameters during real-life cardiac surgery. Cognitive load was measured by capturing interbeat intervals (IBI) from three team members (surgeon, anesthesiologist and perfusionist) using an unobtrusive wearable heart rate sensor and transmitted in real-time to a smartphone application. Clinical data and operating room audio/video recordings were also collected to provide behavioral and contextual information. We developed symbolic representations of the transient cognitive state of individual team members (Individual Cognitive State - ICS), and overall team (Team Cognitive State - TCS) by comparing IBI data from each team member with themselves and with others. The distribution of TCS symbols during surgery enabled us to display and analyze temporal states and dynamic changes of team cognitive load. Shannon's entropy was calculated to estimate the changing levels of team organization and to detect fluctuations resulting from a variety of cognitive demands and/or specific situations (e.g. medical error, emergency, flow disruptions). An illustrative example from a real cardiac surgery team shows how cognitive load patterns shifted rapidly after an actual near-miss medication event, leading the team to a more organized and synchronized state. The methodological approach described in this study provides a measurement technique for the assessment of team physiological synchronization, which can be applied to many other team-based environments. Future research should gather additional validity evidence to support the proposed methods for team cognitive load measurement.

[1]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Are Neurodynamic Organizations A Fundamental Property of Teamwork? , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[2]  M. Zenati,et al.  Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload , 2018, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  Distributed cognition: An alternative model of cognition for medical informatics , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  Jamie C. Gorman,et al.  Understanding and Modeling Teams As Dynamical Systems , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[5]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  L. Lingard,et al.  Understanding Clinical Uncertainty: What Is Going on When Experienced Surgeons Are Not Sure What to Do? , 2013, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Patient Safety in the Cardiac Operating Room: Human Factors and Teamwork A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2013, Circulation.

[8]  C E Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication. 1963. , 1997, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[9]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  Entropy Inference and the James-Stein Estimator, with Application to Nonlinear Gene Association Networks , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  Sarah Henrickson Parker,et al.  Is the "sterile cockpit" concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  Peter J Gianaros,et al.  Focusing neurovisceral integration: cognition, heart rate variability, and cerebral blood flow. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[12]  David M Studdert,et al.  Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. , 2003, Surgery.

[13]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  MEASURING THE INFLUENCE OF TASK COMPLEXITY ON HUMAN ERROR PROBABILITY: AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION , 2013 .

[14]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Conceptualization and Measurement of Team Workload , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[16]  R. Henning,et al.  Social psychophysiological compliance in a four-person research team. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients , 2007 .

[18]  Benson Rosen,et al.  ASSESSING THE INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF TEAM CONSENSUS RATINGS OVER AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL‐LEVEL DATA IN PREDICTING TEAM EFFECTIVENESS , 2001 .

[19]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Healthcare Teams Neurodynamically Reorganize When Resolving Uncertainty , 2016, Entropy.

[20]  Wondea Jung,et al.  A Study on the Validity of a Task Complexity Measure for Emergency Operating Procedures of Nuclear Power Plants—Comparing With a Subjective Workload , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[21]  Matthias Weippert,et al.  Heart rate and heart rate variability as indirect markers of surgeons’ intraoperative stress , 2014, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health.

[22]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Modeling the neurodynamic complexity of submarine navigation teams , 2012, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory.

[23]  A. Gawande,et al.  The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. , 1999, Surgery.

[24]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[25]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Can Neurophysiologic Synchronies Provide a Platform for Adapting Team Performance? , 2009, HCI.

[26]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Cardiac Measures of Cognitive Workload: A Meta-Analysis , 2019, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  Distributed cognition in the heart room: How situation awareness arises from coordinated communications during cardiac surgery , 2007, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[28]  E. Czyżewska,et al.  The surgeon's mental load during decision making at various stages of operations , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[29]  Douglas A Wiegmann,et al.  Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. , 2007, Surgery.

[30]  R. Deinzer,et al.  Endocrine and psychological stress responses in a simulated emergency situation , 2011, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[31]  Nancy G Leveson,et al.  The systems approach to medicine: controversy and misconceptions , 2014, BMJ quality & safety.

[32]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies , 2010, Medical education.

[33]  J. Warm,et al.  Physio-behavioral Synchronicity as an Index of Processes Supporting Team Performance , 2011 .