Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology

This article presents an interdisciplinary study of physical and social psychological effects on crowd dynamics based on a series of bottleneck experiments. Bottlenecks are of particular interest for applications such as crowd management and design of emergency routes because they limit the performance of a facility. In addition to previous work on the dynamics within the bottleneck, this study focuses on the dynamics in front of the bottleneck, more specifically, at entrances. The experimental set-up simulates an entrance scenario to a concert consisting of an entrance gate (serving as bottleneck) and a corridor formed by barriers. The parameters examined are the corridor width, degree of motivation and priming of the social norm of queuing. The analysis is based on head trajectories and questionnaires. We show that the density of persons per square metre depends on motivation and also increases continuously with increasing corridor width, meaning that a density reduction can be achieved by a reduction of space. In comparison to other corridor widths observed, the narrowest corridor is rated as being fairer, more comfortable and as showing less unfair behaviour. Pushing behaviour is seen as ambivalent: it is rated as unfair and listed as a strategy for faster access.

[1]  A. Seyfried,et al.  Methods for measuring pedestrian density, flow, speed and direction with minimal scatter , 2009, 0911.2165.

[2]  Stefan Holl,et al.  Crowding and Queuing in Entrance Scenarios: Influence of Corridor Width in Front of Bottlenecks , 2018, Collective Dynamics.

[3]  Takashi Nagatani,et al.  Evacuation of crawlers and walkers from corridor through an exit , 2006 .

[4]  K. Nishinari,et al.  Introduction of frictional and turning function for pedestrian outflow with an obstacle. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Claire Marrison,et al.  Effects of Motivation and Cabin Configuration on Emergency Aircraft Evacuation Behavior and Rates of Egress , 1996 .

[6]  Weiguo Song,et al.  Experimental study of pedestrian behaviors in a corridor based on digital image processing , 2012 .

[7]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  Redefining the role of obstacles in pedestrian evacuation , 2018, New Journal of Physics.

[8]  Weichen Liao,et al.  Route choice in pedestrians: determinants for initial choices and revising decisions , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  Armin Seyfried,et al.  Collective phenomena in crowds—Where pedestrian dynamics need social psychology , 2017, PloS one.

[10]  L. Mann Queue Culture: The Waiting Line as a Social System , 1969, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  Flow of pedestrians through narrow doors with different competitiveness , 2016 .

[12]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  Contact forces and dynamics of pedestrians evacuating a room: The column effect , 2020 .

[13]  J. Drury,et al.  Come together: two studies concerning the impact of group relations on personal space. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[14]  Xiaoping Zheng,et al.  Layout effects of multi-exit ticket-inspectors on pedestrian evacuation , 2014 .

[15]  Rongrong Zhou,et al.  Consumers Waiting in Queues: The Role of First-Order and Second-Order Justice , 2005 .

[16]  Lubos Buzna,et al.  Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[17]  Jun Zhang,et al.  JuPedSim: an open framework for simulating and analyzing the dynamics of pedestrians , 2016 .

[18]  Marie-Therese Wolfram,et al.  Crowding and queuing at exits and bottlenecks , 2019, 1911.10404.

[19]  Armin Seyfried,et al.  JuPedSim: Framework for simulating and analyzing the Dynamics of Pedestrians , 2015 .

[20]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Pedestrian, Crowd and Evacuation Dynamics , 2013, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[21]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Intrusions into waiting lines : does the queue constitute a social system ? , 1992 .

[22]  Anat Rafaeli,et al.  The Effects of Queue Structure on Attitudes , 2002 .

[23]  M. Schreckenberg,et al.  Experimental study of pedestrian counterflow in a corridor , 2006, cond-mat/0609691.

[24]  Armin Seyfried,et al.  Empirical Results of Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics , 2018 .

[25]  Eran Hanany,et al.  Cutting in Line: Social Norms in Queues , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Bernhard Steffen,et al.  New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks , 2009, Transp. Sci..

[27]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Capacity of doors during evacuation conditions , 2010 .

[28]  Andrew Philippides,et al.  Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[29]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Armin Seyfried,et al.  Collecting pedestrian trajectories , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[31]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[32]  Benedikt Zönnchen,et al.  Queuing at Bottlenecks Using a Dynamic Floor Field for Navigation , 2014 .

[33]  Nikolai W. F. Bode,et al.  Statistical Models for Pedestrian Behaviour in Front of Bottlenecks , 2016 .

[34]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  The Conference in Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2014 ( PED 2014 ) Experimental evidence of the “ Faster Is Slower ” effect , 2014 .