Performance evaluation of routing protocols for heterogeneous Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Routing protocols play an important role in Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) since they are necessarily required by all nodes in these networks to find the best paths to reach the other nodes. However, these protocols are usually measured/analyzed in homogeneous networks where all nodes in these networks have the same capabilities e.g. transmission range, transmitting power, link bandwidth and so on. Hence, homogeneous networks are not suitable for theoretical analysis, simulation measurement or performance testbed in the real applications because different types of nodes usually exist (or they are configured with different parameters). So, they practically have different characteristics and capabilities. This is called heterogeneous networks. In this work, various scenarios (e.g. load, mobility- and density-varying conditions) are constructed to measure the performances of ad hoc routing protocols in heterogeneous networks. The protocols that are taken into consideration are DSR, AODV and OLSR since they are accepted by IETF MANET working group for standardization.

[1]  Sabina Barakovic,et al.  Comparative performance evaluation of Mobile Ad Hoc routing protocols , 2010, The 33rd International Convention MIPRO.

[2]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) , 2003, RFC.

[3]  Ross W. Callon,et al.  Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and dual environments , 1990, RFC.

[4]  Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn,et al.  QoS Routing for Heterogeneous Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Based on Multiple Exponents in the Definition of the Weighted Connectivity Index , 2011, 2011 Seventh International Conference on Signal Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems.

[5]  N. Chaubey,et al.  Performance evaluation of DSR, OLSR and ZRP protocols in MANETs , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics.

[6]  Anis Laouiti,et al.  Multipoint Relaying: An Efficient Technique for Flooding in Mobile Wireless Networks , 2000 .

[7]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Performance Comparison of DSDV and DYMO Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications.

[8]  Fred L. Templin,et al.  Topology Dissemination Based on Reverse-Path Forwarding (TBRPF) , 2004, RFC.

[9]  Gary Scott Malkin,et al.  RIP Version 2 , 1998, RFC.

[10]  David A. Maltz,et al.  The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4 , 2007, RFC.

[11]  Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn,et al.  Performance evaluation of ad hoc routing protocols to deliver MPEG-4 traffic , 2010, 2010 IEEE 12th International Conference on Communication Technology.

[12]  John Moy,et al.  OSPF Version 2 , 1998, RFC.

[13]  Consolee Mbarushimana,et al.  Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols Performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07).

[14]  Dongwook Lim,et al.  Performance evaluation of DSDV and AODV routing protocols in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks , 2010, 4th International Conference on New Trends in Information Science and Service Science.

[15]  Christos Bouras,et al.  Performance evaluation of routing protocols for multimedia transmission over mobile ad hoc networks , 2011, 2011 4th Joint IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC 2011).

[16]  V. Geetha,et al.  Effect of Mobility over Performance of the Ad hoc Networks , 2006, 2006 International Symposium on Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing.

[17]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.