Understanding spatio-temporal uncertainty in medium access with ALOHA protocols

The goal of this paper is understand how location-dependent propagation latency affects medium access control (MAC) by using ALOHA as a case study. MAC protocols in underwater acoustic networks suffer from latency that is five orders-of-magnitude larger than that in radio networks. Existing work on analyzing MAC throughput in RF networks, where the propagation latency is negligible, generally makes assumptions that render propagation latency irrelevant. As a result, only transmit time is considered as being uncertain in contention-based protocols. In this paper, we investigate the spatial dimension of uncertainty that is inherent to varying locations of transmitters, resulting in unequal propagation latency to a receiver. We show through simulation that the benefit of synchronization in slotted ALOHA is completely lost due to such latency. To handle spatial uncertainty, we propose a modification that adds guard bands to transmission slots. We then perform simulation and first-order analysis on this modified MAC to find its optimal operating parameters. Our simulation and analytic results suggest that shorter hops improve throughput.

[1]  Stewart N. Crozier Sloppy-slotted ALOHA , 1990 .

[2]  Hui Chen,et al.  Analyzing the Performance of Multi-hop Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[3]  V. Rodoplu,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for underwater wireless acoustic networks , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[4]  Zeng Shao-wen A MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2007 .

[5]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[6]  J. Heidemann,et al.  Underwater Sensor Networking : Research Challenges and Potential Applications , 2006 .

[7]  Norman Abramson,et al.  The ALOHA SYSTEM. , 1972 .

[8]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Slotted FAMA: a MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006 - Asia Pacific.

[9]  L. Kleinrock,et al.  Packet Switching in Radio Channels: Part I - Carrier Sense Multiple-Access Modes and Their Throughput-Delay Characteristics , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Brian Neil Levine,et al.  A survey of practical issues in underwater networks , 2006, MOCO.

[11]  Norman M. Abramson,et al.  Development of the ALOHANET , 1985, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Data Networks , 1986 .

[13]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  Low-power acoustic modem for dense underwater sensor networks , 2006, WUWNet '06.

[14]  P. Xie,et al.  Exploring Random Access and Handshaking Techniques in Large-Scale Underwater Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[15]  Yuan Li,et al.  Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[16]  Leonardo Badia,et al.  An optimization framework for joint sensor deployment, link scheduling and routing in underwater sensor networks , 2007, MOCO.

[17]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2007, MOCO.

[18]  Jiejun Kong,et al.  Analysis of Aloha Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2006 .

[19]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  T-Lohi: A New Class of MAC Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[20]  Conclusions , 1989 .

[21]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  A MAC protocol for ad-hoc underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2006, Underwater Networks.